Macrosaccus uhlerella
| Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Davis2011ZooKeys98, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Davis2011ZooKeys98">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Lepidoptera
Familia: Gracillariidae
Genus: Macrosaccus
Name
Macrosaccus uhlerella (Fitch) comb. n. – Wikispecies link – Pensoft Profile
- Argyromiges uhlerella Fitch, 1859:838, No. 337.
- Lithocolletis uhlerella (Fitch).- Chambers 1871[1]: 183.- Walsingham 1889[2]: 53.- Riley 1891[3]: 109, No. 5900.- Dyar 1902 [1903][4]: 551, No. 6268.- Braun 1908[5]: 291.- Forbes 1923[6]: 192.- Meyrick 1912a[7]: 7; 1912b[8]: 33.- Braun 1914[9]: 114.- McDunnough 1939[10]: 95, No. 9190.
- Phyllonorycter uhlerella (Fitch).- Ely 1918[11]: 59.- Davis 1983[12]: 10.- De Prins and De Prins 2005[13]: 360.- De Prins and De Prins 2011[14].
- Lithocolletis amorphaeella Chambers 1877[15]: 132, 137.- Walsingham 1889[2]: 53 (synonym of Lithocolletis uhlerella).- Riley 1891[3]: 109, No. 5900.- Braun 1908[5]: 292.- Dyar 1902 [1903][4]: 551, No. 6268.- Braun 1908[5]: 291.- Meyrick 1912a[7]: 7; 1912b[8]: 33.- Braun, 1914: 114.- McDunnough 1939[10]: 95, No. 9190.
- Lithocolletis amorphae Frey and Boll 1878[16]: 275.- Walsingham 1889[2]: 53 (synonym of Lithocolletis uhlerella).- Riley 1891[3]: 109, No. 5900.- Dyar 1902 [1903][4]: 551, No. 6268.- Braun 1908[5]: 292.- McDunnough 1939[10]: 95, No. 9190.
Diagnosis
The forewing pattern of this species is most similar to that of Macrosaccus morrisella in having the basal strigulae less oblique than those present in Macrosaccus robiniella and Macrosaccus neomexicanus, but it differs from Macrosaccus morrisella in lacking the distinct basal white streak typical of the latter. The male genitalia of Macrosaccus uhlerella are distinct in possessing the most modified, slender valvae (Fig. 28) of any member of Macrosaccus.
Adult
(Figs 7, 8). Forewing length 2.2–2.8 mm.
Head: Vestiture of head and antenna similar to Macrosaccus robiniella and Macrosaccus morrisella.
Thorax: Light to dark brown to fuscous dorsally, sometimes with a slight orange luster and a suffusion of fuscous posteriorly; shiny white ventrally; tegula usually orange brown, occasionally with fuscous suffusion posteriorly. Forewing mostly light brownish orange with 4 white costal strigulae, each usually with pale to dark fuscous borders; pattern similar to Macrosaccus morrisella except without a distinct slender, oblique, white streak from tegula at base of wing; 3 white dorsal strigulae usually present, but these oriented less obliquely than in Macrosaccus robiniella; basal strigula white, but sometimes obscure; median strigula connected to second costal strigula to form a narrow white fascia as in 4; dorsal half of wing with black scaling variably present between strigulae; a large black apical spot present similar to that of Macrosaccus robiniella and Macrosaccus morrisella; cilia light grey to white. Hindwing, including fringe, uniformly grey. Legs similar to Macrosaccus robiniella in colour pattern.
Abdomen: Similar to Macrosaccus robiniella, dark fuscous dorsally and white ventrally with greyish suffusion laterally on anterior portion of segments 2–7 and sometimes ventrally on A8.
Male genitalia (Figs 28, 29): Distal half of valva abruptly constricted to ~ 1/3 the width of basal half; saccular lobe broadly produced, truncate. Saccus a long, slender rod ~ 1.3× length of valva. Aedeagus long and slender, ~ 3.0× length of valva, with phallobase only slightly more enlarged than aedeagus.
Female genitalia (Figs 30, 31): Ductus bursae long and slender, slightly longer (~ 1.2×) than length of elongate corpus bursae. Accessory bursae spherical, ~ half the length of corpus bursae, arising from approximately midway along ductus bursae. Corpus bursae elliptical, with series of small, dentate spicules arranged in faint longitudinal folds or striae; walls of anterior end (distal 1/6) of corpus bursae membranous.
Larva and pupa
Not examined.
Larval mine
(Figs 51–53). The mature mine is an elongate-oval, whitish blotch located on the under (abaxial) side of the leaf usually near the edge of the leaflet. Eventually, as the mine becomes tentiform, the leaf edge is slightly curled (Fig. 51).
Hosts
(Table 1). Amorpha fruticosa L., (Chambers 1878[17]: 58; Frey and Boll 1878[16]: 276; Walsingham 1889[2]: 119; Braun 1908[5]: 292). Amorpha sp., Robinia sp. (Robinson et al. 2002[18]: 357). The primary host, Amorpha fruticosa, is a shrub up to 4 meters high which occurs naturally from Louisiana to Florida and north to Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. Because no adults reared from Robinia are known or have been examined, the host record reported in Robinson et al. (2002)[18] is questionable.
Types
Argyromiges uhlerella Fitch [type material and deposition not stated, believed lost]: [New York]. Lithocolletis amorphaeella Chambers: Lectotype (present designation), ♀: “Type 1327; Chambers, Colorado; Lithocolletis amorphaeella Cham.; Lectotype ♀, Lithocolletis amorphaeella Chambers, by D. Davis; ♀ genitalia on slide 4530, D.R. Davis”, (MCZ), [head, right wings missing]. Lithocolletis amorphae Frey and Boll: Type material not stated, deposition unknown; [Texas].
Material examined
UNITED STATES: COLORADO: Specific locality unknown: 1 ♀, lectotype, Lithocolletis amorphaeella Cham., DRD slide 4530, (MCZ). ILLINOIS: McDunnough Co: 3 mi. East of Good Hope, Short Fork Seep, Ti7N-R2W, Section 27–28: 2 ♂, 2 ♀, 7 Aug 2010, emerged 11–17 Aug 2010, leaf mine on Amorpha fruticosa, J. Wiker and T. Harrison, slide USNM 33918, (USNM). Putnam Co: 1 ♂, 1 ♀, 29 Mar 1938, DRD slide 4508; 1 ♂, 18 Aug 1939; 1 ♂, 8 Sep 1940, DRD slide 4507; 2 ♂, 20 Sep 1967, reared from underside leafmine Amorpha fruticosa; 2 ♂, 25 Sep 1940; 1 ♂, 5 Oct 1946, DRD slide 4506, reared from leafmine, Amorpha fruticosa, M. O. Glenn, (INHS). Vermilion Co: Kickapoo State Recreation Area: 1 ♀, 13 Jun 1991, moth iss. 24 Jun 1991, T. Harrison, (INHS). MISSOURI: Boone Co: Colombia: 1 ♀, 14 Dec 1969, W. S. Craig, under bark of sycamore, (USNM). TEXAS: Specific locality unknown: 4 ♀, from Amorpha fruticosa, (BMNH). Dallas Co: Dallas: 2 ♂, 3 ♀, Boll, slide BM 4003, (BMNH); Dallas, Boll. 1876, 1 ♂, 4 ♀, bred from Amorpha fruticosa, Stainton collection 1893-134, (BMNH).
Distribution
Macrosaccus uhlerella is known to occur from Colorado, Illinois, Missouri, New York, and Texas.
Remarks
For over 120 years Argyromiges uhlerella Fitch has been regarded as the senior synonym of amorphaeella Chambers. The inadequacy of the original description of Argyromiges uhlerella (quoted below), together with the disappearance of any type material, has caused some uncertainty regarding this insect’s identity. In his review of the insects feeding on Robinia pseudoacacia, Fitch (1859)[19] proposed two names now assigned to Macrosaccus which he believed to be related to the Robinia leafminer: Argyromiges pseudacaciella (now considered a synonymn of Macrosaccus robiniella) and Argyromiges uhlerella. Fitch stated that he did not know the hosts for these two moths (i.e., neither had not been reared). Walsingham (1889)[2] concluded that Fitch’s description of Macrosaccus uhlerella agreed with that of Macrosaccus amorphaeella, proposed 18 years later by Chambers (1877)[15], and he consequently synonymized the latter name. All later workers treating this complex accepted Walsingham’s decision. Closer examination of wing pattern variation within large series of reared Macrosaccus robiniella, however, suggests that Fitch’s description more approximates the greyish forewing colour of some specimens of Macrosaccus robiniella than it does the non-greyish, more brownish forewing colour prevalent in the smaller sample of adult Macrosaccus rearedfrom Amorpha fruticosa examined. Fitch’s description also contains such abnormalities as the “five white spots along their outer sides” and “the tip of the wings is here replaced by a short black stripe thrice as long as it is wide”, both of which may possibly reflect the poor condition of his specimen(s). Worn specimens of Macrosaccus robiniella have been observed with one or two strigulae indistinct or missing, as well as some with reduced apical spots. Similar variation might also be found to occur within moths reared from Amorpha, once more specimens become available for examination.
No type material of “Argyromiges” uhlerella is believed to exist. In 1977, during a search for Fitch’s Lepidoptera types deposited in the USNM, Tim McCabe found a pin bearing Fitch’s label 8158 (the type number for uhlerella) in the main collection. The moth was missing and was presumed destroyed. The pin with that number has since disappeared. Because the name uhlerella has been used consistently as the valid name for this taxon since before 1899, we believe that this usage should continue even though some doubt now exists regarding the correct application of the name.
Original description of Argyromiges uhlerella Fitch
“337. Uhler’s leaf-miner, Argyromiges Uhlerella, new species.”
“This resembles Pseudacaciella, but is throughout of paler color, the fore wings being golden gray, with five white spots along their outer sides, of which the hindmost ones are small, the others quite large and bordered with blackish upon their anterior sides; and the black dot on the tip of the wings is here replaced by a short black stripe thrice as long as it is wide; whilst the hind wings and their fringes are pale silvery gray. These marks will suffice to distinguish this from the two preceding species.”
Taxon Treatment
- Davis, D; De Prins, J; 2011: Systematics and biology of the new genus Macrosaccus with descriptions of two new species (Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae) ZooKeys, 98: 29-82. doi
Other References
- ↑ Chambers V (1871) Micro-Lepidoptera. Canadian Entomologist 3: 54–58, 84–88, 108–112, 127–130, 146–149, 161–166, 182–185, 205–209, 221–224. doi:10.4039/Ent354-3
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Walsingham L (1889) Steps toward a revision of Chambers’ Index, with notes and descriptions of new species (cont.). Insect Life 2: 23–26, 51–54, 77–81, 116–120.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Riley C (1891) Tineina. In: Smith J. List of the Lepidoptera of Boreal America. American Entomological Society, Philadelphia, 94–114.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Dyar H (1903) A list of North American Lepidoptera. United States National Museum Bulletin 52 (1902): xix + 723.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Braun A (1908) Revision of the North American species of the genus Lithocolletis Hübner. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 34: 269–357, pls. xx-xxiv.
- ↑ Forbes W (1923) The Lepidoptera of New York and neighboring states, Part 1, Primitive forms, Microlepidoptera, Pyraloids, Bombyces. Cornell University Agriculture Experiment Station. Memoir 68:1-729.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Meyrick E (1912a) Lepidoptera Heterocera (Tineae). Fam. Gracilariadae [sic]. In: Wytsman P (Ed) Genera Insectorum. Fascicule 128. V. Verteneuil & L. Desmet, Imprimeurs-Éditeurs, 1–36.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Meyrick E (1912b) Adelidae, Micropterigidae, Gracilariadae [sic]. In: Wagner H (Ed) Lepidopterorum Catalogus, Pars 6, W. Junk, Berlin, 25–68.
- ↑ Braun A (1914) Evolution of the color pattern in the microlepidopterous genus Lithocolletis. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia 16: 103–168, pls. iii–iv.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 McDunnough J (1939) Check List of the Lepidoptera of Canada and the United States of America. Part II. Microlepidoptera. Memoirs of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 2:1-171.
- ↑ Ely C (1918) A revision of the North American Gracilariidae [sic] from the standpoint of venation. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 19:29-77.
- ↑ Davis D (1983) Gracillariidae. In: Hodges R Dominick T Davis D Ferguson D Franclemont J Munroe E Powell J (Eds) Check List of the Lepidoptera of North America North of Mexico. E.W. Classey Ltd. and the Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, London, 9–11.
- ↑ De Prins W, De Prins J (2005) Gracillariidae (Lepidoptera). In: Landry B (Ed) World Catalogue of Insects, vol. 6. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, 1–502.
- ↑ De Prins J, De Prins W (2011) Global Taxonomic Database of Gracillariidae (Lepidoptera). http://www.gracillariidae.net [accessed 11 March 2011]
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 Chambers V (1877) Art. VI. The Tineina of Colorado. Bulletin of the United States Geological Survey 3:121-145.
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 Frey H, Boll J (1878) Tineen aus Texas. Entomologische Zeitung, Stettin, 39:249-279.
- ↑ Chambers V (1878) Art. IV. Tineina and their foodplants. Bulletin of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories 4:107-124.
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 Robinson G, Ackery P, Kitching I, Beccaloni G, Hernández L (2002) Hostplants of the moth and butterfly caterpillars of America North of Mexico. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 69:1-824.
- ↑ Fitch A (1859) Report on the noxious, beneficial and other insects of the state of New York. Fifth report. Transactions of the New York State Agricultural Society 18 (1858): 781-854, 9 Figs Also published separately with different pagination (p. 1–74) and with an index to parts 3–5, New York.
Images
|
