Cuscuta mantiqueirana
Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Costea2021PhytoKeys184, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Costea2021PhytoKeys184">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Solanales
Familia: Convolvulaceae
Genus: Cuscuta
Name
Cuscuta mantiqueirana Costea, S.S.Silva, Sim.-Bianch. sp. nov. – Wikispecies link – Pensoft Profile
Diagnosis
Cuscuta mantiqueirana is similar to C. odorata var. botryoides, C. rotundiflora and C. globiflora because of their corolla that becomes globose at fructification and their well-developed scales with numerous fimbriae, but it differs from all these taxa in narrower calyx lobes, the presence of four stomatiferous lobes or projections, 0.4–0.6 mm long at the ovary apex, which form a collar at the fruit stage, as well as 3-colpate pollen grains with reticulate tectum. It differs from C. odorata var. botryoides in the obconical pedicels and larger flowers, 4.5–7 mm long (pedicels are cylindrical and flowers 5.5–5 mm long in C. odorata var. botryoides). From C. rotundiflora it differs in the infrastaminal scales equalling or exceeding the corolla tube, cylindrical stamen filaments and styles, as well as stigmas 0.5–0.6 mm wide (in C. rotundiflora the scales are shorter than corolla tube, filaments and styles are subulate and stigmas 1–1.5 mm wide. From C. globiflora it differs in the spreading to reflexed corolla lobes and globose-depressed stigmas (in C. globiflora, corolla lobes are erect-connivent and stigmas conical).
Type
Brazil. Minas Gerais: Camanducaia, Monte Verde. Parasita com ramos desde alaranjados até vináceos, sempre em local sombreado e humido. Flores amarelas, 22 IV 1999, R.'Simão-Bianchini 1241 (holotype: SP!; isotypes: K!, NY!, MBM!, R!, SPF!, UB n.v., UEC!, WLU!)
Description
Stems medium to coarse, yellow-orange, purple-tinged or entirely purple. Inflorescences paniculiform-racemiform, occasionally glomerulate, usually not confluent; pedicels 1.5–4 mm, thick, gradually tapering into the fleshy, conical receptacle; bracts 1 at the base of cymes, 1.1–2.5 mm long and 0.8–1.6 mm wide, fleshy, triangular-ovate, rounded, not carinate, margins entire. Flowers 5-merous, (4–) 5–7 mm long, fleshy, white when fresh, dark-brown when dried; papillae absent; laticifers ± visible, translucent in the calyx, corolla lobes, and more noticeable, dark-colored in the 1/3 distal half of the ovary; isolated, oblong-ovoid. A few stomata are present along the calyx mid-vein lobes, but stomatiferous carinas are usually absent; calyx 2.8–4 mm long, creamy-white to purple-tinged when fresh, dark-brown when dried, not reticulate, dull, cupulate, ca. 3/4 as long as corolla tube, divided 2/3–4/5 to the base, tube 0.5–1.5 mm long, lobes 2–2.5 mm long, ovate-oblong, longer than wide to as long as wide, the two external ones overlapping, usually not carinate, margins membranous, finely erose, not auriculate at base, apex rounded; corolla (4–) 4.5–7 mm long, tube 2.1–4.6 mm long, campanulate but becoming ± globose at fructification; lobes 1.8–2.5 mm long, initially erect, later reflexed, shorter than the tube, broadly ovate, overlapping, ± auriculate at base, margin entire to irregularly crenulate, apex rounded, straight; stamens exserted, shorter than the corolla lobes, anthers 0.8–1.2 mm long, elliptic to oblong, filaments 0.6–0.8 mm long; pollen 3-zonocolpate,19–29.5 μm long and 17–20 μm wide, subprolate to spheroidal or suboblate, tectum microreticulate to reticulate, lumina 0.9–3.3 μm in diameter; infrastaminal scales 3–5 mm long, equalling to slightly longer than corolla tube, ovate to oblong, bridged at 0.7–1.6 mm, densely fimbriatae, fimbriae 50–80, 0.5–1.2 mm long, thin-filiform without papillae distally; ovary apex on both sides of styles raised to form two pairs of lobes or projections with stomata, 0.4–0.6 mm long; styles 0.3–0.9 mm long, 0.3–0.5 mm thick, much shorter than the ovary, cylindrical to slightly subulate, sometimes also with stomata at their base; stigma 0.35–0.6 mm long and 0.5–0.7 mm wide, white to purple in the fresh flowers, globose to wider than long, convoluted and lobed. Capsules circumscissile, 4–4.8 mm long and 4–5.5 wide mm, globose to ovoid, with a collar around the large interstylar aperture, opaque, entirely surrounded by the withered, persistent corolla. Seeds 2 per capsule, 1.5–2.8 mm long and 2–2.4 mm wide, dorsiventrally compressed, subrotund, hilum area lateral, 0.7–1 mm in diameter, scar 0.25–0.30 mm long, seed coat alveolate/papillate. Chromosome number not known.
Character | Cuscuta mantiqueirana | Cuscuta odorata var. botryoides |
---|---|---|
Stems | Yellow-orange, purple-tinged or purple | Yellow-orange |
Pedicels | 1.5–4 mm, obconical | 1–3 mm, cylindrical |
Bracts | 1.1–2.5 mm long | 2.2–3.2 mm long |
Flower length | (4–) 5–7 mm | 3.8–5 mm |
Calyx | 2.8–4 mm long, divided 2/3–4/5 to the base, tube 0.5–1.5 mm long, lobes 2–2.5 mm long, ovate-oblong, longer than wide to as long as wide, the two external ones overlapping, usually not carinate, not auriculate at base. | 2.8–3.4 mm long, divided ca. 1/2–2/3 to the base, tube 1–2 mm, lobes ovate-round, 1–2 mm long, wider than long, the two external ones carinate, broadly overlapping, auriculate at base. |
Corolla | (4–) 4.5–7 mm long, tube 2.1–4.6 mm long, lobes 1.8–2.5 mm long. | Corolla 3.5–4.5; tube 2–3.5 mm long, lobes 1–1.8 mm long. |
Infrastaminal scales | 3–5 mm long, bridged at 0.7–1.6 mm, fimbriae 50–90, 0.5–1.2 mm long, thin-filiform without papillae. | 2–3.7 mm long, bridged at 1–1.5 mm, fimbriae 60–110, 0.3–0.6 mm, often with 1–2 distal papillae. |
Stamens | Anthers 0.8–1.2 mm long, filaments 0.6–0.8 mm long. | Anthers 0.6–0.8 mm long, filaments 0.4–0.6 mm long. |
Pollen | 3-zonocolpate,19–29.5 μm long and 17–20 μm wide, subprolate to spheroidal or suboblate, tectum microreticulate to reticulate, lumina 0.9–3.3 μm in diameter. | (3–) 4–5 colpate, 19–26 μm long and 18–26 μm wide, sphaeroidal to subsphaeroidal, tectum perforatum; puncta 0.4–1(1.2) μm in diameter. |
Ovary | Ovary apex on both sides of styles risen to form 4 lobes or projections with stomata, 0.4–0.6 mm long. | Apex without lobes or projections but a few stomata may be present. |
Styles and stigmas | Styles 0.3–0.9 mm long, 0.25–0.5 mm thick, cylindrical or slightly subulate, sometimes also with stomata at their base; stigmas 0.35–0.5 mm long and 0.5–0.7 mm wide | Styles 0.8–3 mm long, 0.25–0.35 mm thick, cylindrical; stigmas 0.3–0.4 mm long and 0.3–0.5 mm wide. |
Capsule | Stomatiferous lobes form a collar around the large interstylar aperture | Without a collar around the large interstylar aperture. |
Distribution | Brazil: Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo. | Argentina: Misiones; Brazil: Paraná, Santa Catarina. |
Elevation | 800–2360 m | 3–150 m |
Ecology | Montane rain forest | Resting in a forest or near rivers |
Geographical distribution and ecology
The new species is apparently endemic to Serra da Mantiqueira in Southeastern Brazil (states of Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo), where it occurs at elevations between 800–2360 m. The climate is mesothermic, characterized by distinct dry and rainy seasons, with an average temperature that depends on the elevation, but generally exceeding 10 °C (ICMBio 2018[1]). Serra da Mantiqueira is part of the Atlantic Forest Biome and the habitat of C. mantiqueirana consists of montane and upper montane cloud forests (Segadas-Vianna and Dau 1965[2]; Ururahy et al. 1983[3]; Veloso et al. 2012). During field work conducted in Itatiaia National Park and Monte Verde, we observed C. mantiqueirana at forest edges, margins of roads and clearings as well as parasitizing isolated woody plants in the forest (Fig. 4A, B). The most common host is Fuchsia regia (Vell.) Munz (Onagraceae; Fig. 4E), which is the most widely distributed species of this genus in Brazil, occurring throughout the distribution range of C. mantiqueirana (Berry 1989[4]). Fuchsia regia is currently accepted to include three subspecies, regia, serrae P. Berry, and reitzii P. Berry (Berry 1989[4]), and future field work will have to determine the frequency of occurrence on these subspecies. To a less extent, perhaps as secondary hosts, C. mantiqueirana parasitizes other herbaceous or woody plants: Asteraceae (Baccharis L., Lepidaploa (Cass.) Cass., Mikania Willd., including Mikania micrantha Kunth, and other unidentified Asteraceae), Euphorbiaceae (Croton L.), Fabaceae, Melastomatacaeae, Primulaceae (Myrsine venosa A. DC.), Polygonaceae (unidentified), Rubiaceae (cf. Spermacoce L.), Solanaceae (Solanum L.), and Styracaceae.
Phenology
Flowering in Nov-Dec and Feb-Aug, which may depend on the elevation. Very few herbarium specimens possess capsules and seeds which suggests that plants are preponderantly xenogamous and also reproducing vegetatively (Wright et al. 2012[5]).
Etymology
The specific epithet is a noun in apposition that comes from the name of the mountain range to which the species is apparently endemic. The word “Mantiqueira” is derived from Tupi-Guarani meaning “mountains that cry” alluding perhaps to the plethora of dripping water, streams and rivers that are present during the wet season with abundant rainfall (Mendes Júnior et al. 1991[6]).
Vernacular names
The common names used in the area are: Cipó-chumbo, fios-de-ovos, erva-de-passarinho (although also commonly used for other species of Cuscuta that occur in the region).
Provisional conservation status
The GeoCAT rapid assessment tool (Bachman et al. 2011[7]) assigned an Endangered (EN) conservation status based on an EOO of 33011.111 Km2 and a Vulnerable (VU) status based an AOO of 504.000 Km2. Further field research is necessary to investigate possible additional distributional records in the region, and assess other factors such as habitat threats to determine if this species is in need of conservation in any of the parts of the extensive Mantiqueira mountain range.
Additional specimens examined
Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: Itatiaia, 13 Apr 1963, E. Pereira & C. Pereira 7559 (HB); idem, Km 7 da estrada de Registro para Planalto, 17 Feb 1969, G.F.J. Pabst 9306 (MBM, HB); Parque Nacional de Itatiaia, 2 Nov 1965, G.G. Eiten & L.T. Eiten 6528 (SP); idem, 2 Apr 1960, O.M. Barth 7144 (IOC, US); idem Pico das Agulhas Negras, 2159 m, 1 May 1977, D.M. Vital s.n. (UEC, BR, NY); idem, Estrada Nova Km 8, 25 Mar 1942, A.C. Brade 17266 (RB); idem, 2200 m, 1 May 1977, J. Vasconcellos-Neto et al. s.n. (UEC); Estrada do Ponto Zero para as prateleiras, 22°22'12"S, 44°42'31"W, 2380 m, 11 Dec 2002, R. Marquete et al. 3437 (RB; DNA accession 1123); Resende, West side of Mt. Itaiaia, at km 9–10 km on road from “Registro” to the shelter house, “Abrigo Rebouças”, 2100 m, 7 Nov 1965, G.G. Eiten & L.T. Eiten 6682 (K, SP, NY, MO, UBC, US); Estrada vicinal de acesso ao Pico das Agulhas Negras, 24 May 1996, G.F. Árbocz 2750 et al. (SP, NY, UEC, WLU). Minas Gerais: Alto Caparaó, Parque Nacional do Caparaó, Trilha Tronqueira ao Pico da Bandeira, 13 Mar 2010, J.M. Silva & J. Cordeiro 7543 (MBM); Camanducaia, Monte Verde; idem, 3 Jun 1992, R. Simão-Bianchini 317 (SPF, WLU); idem, 12 Jan 2020, R. Simão-Bianchini 2332 (SP); idem, 16 Mar 1976, H.F. Leitão Filho et al. 1815 (UEC, SPSF, UB, WLU) idem, Serra da Mantiqueira, 11 Dec 2001, L.D. Meireles & R. Balinello 770 (UEC); idem, Pico do Selado, 1810 m, 17 May 2002, L.S. Kinoshita et al. 72 (UEC); Itamonte, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia, 20 Nov 2018, S.S. Silva et al. Itati 02, 04, 05 (SP, WLU); idem, 21 Nov 2018, S.S. Silva et al. Itati 08 (SP, WLU; DNA accession 2436); idem, Itamonte, Serra Fina, Sítio Pierre, 2100 m, 20 Jul 2005, L.D. Meireles et al. 1843 (SP, UEC); Idem, 4 Apr 1995, 2100 m, I. Koch & L.S. Kinoshita 449 (UEC); São Paulo: Campos do Jordão, Instituto Kurihara, 8 Jun 1940, G. Hashimoto 262 (SP); idem, Parque Estadual Campos do Jordão, 1760 m, 8 Feb 1980, R.A.A. Barreto 48 (SPSF); idem, Praia São José dos Alpes, 8 Jun 1992, E. Gianotti et al. 26667 (UEC); idem, 2 Aug 1980, A.A.B. Rubens 48 (RB) Pindamonhangaba, P.E. de Campos do Jordão, 12 Apr 1985, M.J. Robim 277 (SPSF); idem, 12 Apr 1985, C. Proença & M.F. Bean 496 (CEN, UB).
Original Description
- Costea, M; Silva, S; Simão-Bianchini, R; Simões, A; Stefanović, S; 2021: Notes on the systematics of Cuscuta sect. Subulatae (subg. Grammica) with the description of Cuscuta mantiqueirana, a new species from Brazil PhytoKeys, 184: 27-44. doi
Images
|
Other References
- ↑ ICMBio (2018) Fauna brasileira ameaçada de extinção. In Fauna brasileira ameaçada de extinçao. Fundação Biodiversitas para a Conservação da Diversidade Biológica.Brasília, Distriro Federal, 492 pp.
- ↑ Segadas-Vianna F, Dau L (1965) Ecology of the Itatiaia range, southeastern Brazil.Imprensa nacional, Rio de Janeiro, 53 pp.
- ↑ Ururahy J, Collares J, Santos M, Barreto R (1983) Vegetação: As regiões fitoecológicas, sua natureza e seus recursos econômicos, estudo fitogeográfico. Brasil. Ministério das Minas e Energia. Projeto RadamBrasil.Levantamento de Recursos Naturais32: 553–623.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Berry P (1989) A systematic revision of Fuchsia sect. Quelusia (Onagraceae).Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden76(2): 532–584. https://doi.org/10.2307/2399499
- ↑ Wright M, Ianni M, Costea M (2012) Diversity and evolution of pollen-ovule production in Cuscuta (dodders, Convolvulaceae) in relation to floral morphology.Plant Systematics and Evolution298(2): 369–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-011-0550-z
- ↑ Mendes Júnior L, Antoniazzi M, Vieira M, Susemihl P (1991) Relatório Mantiqueira.FEDAPAM (Frente de Defesa da Mantiqueira), São Paulo, 54 pp.
- ↑ Bachman S, Moat J, Hill A, Torre J, Scott B (2011) Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: Geospatial conservation assessment tool.ZooKeys150: 117–126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.150.2109