Asthenopus angelae

From Species-ID
Jump to: navigation, search
Notice: This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.

If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly.

This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Molineri C, Salles F, Peters J (2015) Phylogeny and biogeography of Asthenopodinae with a revision of Asthenopus, reinstatement of Asthenopodes, and the description of the new genera Hubbardipes and Priasthenopus (Ephemeroptera, Polymitarcyidae). ZooKeys (478) : 45–128, doi. Versioned wiki page: 2017-04-10, version 139109, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Asthenopus_angelae&oldid=139109 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.

Citation formats to copy and paste

BibTeX:

@article{Molineri2015ZooKeys,
author = {Molineri, Carlos AND Salles, Frederico F. AND Peters, Janice G.},
journal = {ZooKeys},
publisher = {Pensoft Publishers},
title = {Phylogeny and biogeography of Asthenopodinae with a revision of Asthenopus, reinstatement of Asthenopodes, and the description of the new genera Hubbardipes and Priasthenopus (Ephemeroptera, Polymitarcyidae)},
year = {2015},
volume = {},
issue = {478},
pages = {45--128},
doi = {10.3897/zookeys.478.8057},
url = {http://zookeys.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=4601},
note = {Versioned wiki page: 2017-04-10, version 139109, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Asthenopus_angelae&oldid=139109 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.}

}

RIS/ Endnote:

TY - JOUR
T1 - Phylogeny and biogeography of Asthenopodinae with a revision of Asthenopus, reinstatement of Asthenopodes, and the description of the new genera Hubbardipes and Priasthenopus (Ephemeroptera, Polymitarcyidae)
A1 - Molineri C
A1 - Salles F
A1 - Peters J
Y1 - 2015
JF - ZooKeys
JA -
VL -
IS - 478
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.478.8057
SP - 45
EP - 128
PB - Pensoft Publishers
M1 - Versioned wiki page: 2017-04-10, version 139109, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Asthenopus_angelae&oldid=139109 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.

M3 - doi:10.3897/zookeys.478.8057

Wikipedia/ Citizendium:

<ref name="Molineri2015ZooKeys">{{Citation
| author = Molineri C, Salles F, Peters J
| title = Phylogeny and biogeography of Asthenopodinae with a revision of Asthenopus, reinstatement of Asthenopodes, and the description of the new genera Hubbardipes and Priasthenopus (Ephemeroptera, Polymitarcyidae)
| journal = ZooKeys
| year = 2015
| volume =
| issue = 478
| pages = 45--128
| pmid =
| publisher = Pensoft Publishers
| doi = 10.3897/zookeys.478.8057
| url = http://zookeys.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=4601
| pmc =
| accessdate = 2024-12-13

}} Versioned wiki page: 2017-04-10, version 139109, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Asthenopus_angelae&oldid=139109 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.</ref>

See also the citation download page at the journal.


Taxonavigation

Ordo: Ephemeroptera
Familia: Polymitarcyidae
Genus: Asthenopus

Name

Asthenopus angelae de Souza & MolineriWikispecies linkPensoft Profile

Material

(see de Souza and Molineri 2012[1]). Additional records: 13 nymphs (including 3 male and 1 female pharate subimago) from BRAZIL, Amazonas, Codajás, Urucurizinho, Lago Cuxuará (A10-lago Aquapi 14), 15.ix.2003 (slides IBN645CM and IBN646CM) (aprox. S 3°55' − W 62°3'); and 1 pharate male subimago from BRAZIL, Amazonas, São Paulo de Olivença, Bom Sucesso (A02-agapito), 9.iv.2003 (slide IBN606CM) (aprox. S 3°28' − W 68°59'). Deposited in INPA (4 nymphs), CZNC (6 nymphs), IBN (3 nymphs).

Diagnosis

Only one autapomorphy was recovered in our analysis for Asthenopus angelae, a change in the ratio A (total length forceps)/E(basal width) from 6.2 to 6.5–7.1 (i.e., forceps become slightly slender). This species can be recognized by the following combination of characters: 1) FW size male 7.0–10.0 mm (Fig. 16J–K), female 12.0–17.0 mm; 2) ratio FW/foreleg length 1.4–1.6; 3) pronotum width/length ratio: 2.0–2.2 (male), 2.2–2.9 (female); 4) 5–11 imv present in male FW, relatively short and poorly anastomosed; 5) male FW with 1–4 cross veins between Rs and MA basal to Rs fork; 6) ratio total length/basal width of forceps 6.5–7.1 (Fig. 17D); 7) penes tubular, with well developed thumb, curved ventro-medially, with apex projecting acutely, furrow separating penial lobe from thumb reduced or absent (Fig. 17D), pedestals subrectangular to subovate, relatively large; 8) female sternum VIII with anteromedian keel and reduced sockets similar to other species; 9) eggs (Fig. 18B) with 3–5 threads on polar caps, ratio maximum width of egg/maximum width of PC 1.1–1.3, chorion with smooth area around rounded disks; 10) nymph, ratio total length of mandible / mandibular tusk length 1.6; 11) space between the subbasal and the submedian tubercles relatively long and straight (Fig. 14B).

Distribution

Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia and Peru.

Discussion

This species was recently described from all the stages (de Souza and Molineri 2012[1]), and in our analysis it appears as sister to Asthenopus magnus, but with relatively low support. In the original description, nymphs and female adults were not distinguished from Asthenopus curtus, because of lack of characters. We proposed (above in diagnosis) some characters that should be checked and confirmed with the study of more material. We suggest that specific identification of this and the other species of the genus should be confirmed when possible with the study of male genitalia. Peru was mentioned by de Souza and Molineri (2012)[1] in the list of material but not in the distribution, so here it is added in that section.

Taxon Treatment

  • Molineri, C; Salles, F; Peters, J; 2015: Phylogeny and biogeography of Asthenopodinae with a revision of Asthenopus, reinstatement of Asthenopodes, and the description of the new genera Hubbardipes and Priasthenopus (Ephemeroptera, Polymitarcyidae) ZooKeys, (478): 45-128. doi

Images

Other References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 De-Souza M, Molineri C (2012) The adults and nymphs of Asthenopus angelae new species (Ephemeroptera: Polymitarcyidae) from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil and Colombia. Zootaxa 3399: 45–52.