User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/IBB 2011/Collaborative platforms
From Species-ID
< User:Daniel Mietchen | Talks | IBB 2011
Science is already a wiki if you look at it a certain way. It’s just a highly inefficient one — the incremental edits are made in papers instead of wikispace, and significant effort is expended to recapitulate existing knowledge in a paper in order to support the one to three new assertions made in any one paper. — John Wilbanks. Illustration: papers and wikispace.
Definition
- For our purposes, any set of interlinked documents (or research objects) that are collaboratively editable from within a common environment (and be this a standard-based API) shall be regarded as a collaborative platform.
- Just like Wordpress or Drupal, MediaWiki is open source, with a plethora of plug-ins, and used by millions.
- A wiki page might serve as a community hub for users interested in a specific topic/ semantic tag
- Wikiedit as "least citable unit" for more fine-grained referencing
- Prototypical "two-way hyperlinks" by way of WhatLinksHere
- Let's have a look at just one: The lack of integration between wikis and scholarly workflows. Is this a principle problem of wikis?
- Typical design of a wiki revolves around types of information, e.g. WikiPedia, WikiBooks, WikiNews, WikiSource, WikiQuote
- Expert workflows revolve around topics, and for these topics, many kinds of information are potentially relevant, so should be easily accessible
- Real-time visualization of wiki edits could highlight science as a process (or community)
NMR Wiki
{{#widget:Iframe |url=http://nmrwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Pulse_sequence_drawing |width=1000 |height=600 |border=0 }}
Quantum Wiki
{{#widget:Iframe |url=http://www.quantiki.org/wiki/Open_Problems |width=1000 |height=600 |border=0 }}