Tricrania stansburii (Cline, Andrew R. & Huether, Jeffrey P. 2011)
| Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Cline2011Zootaxa2832, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Cline2011Zootaxa2832">{{Citation |
Ordo: Coleoptera
Familia: Meloidae
Genus: Tricrania
Name
Tricrania stansburii Haldeman – Wikispecies link – Pensoft Profile
- Tricrania stansburii Cline, Andrew R., 2011, Zootaxa 2832: 11-14.
Materials Examined
Type material. Holotype— T. murrayi (MCZ): 184; T. murrayi Lec., Oregon; type4951 [red label] Adult redescription. Length: 8–14mm (mean = 12mm, N= 20), width 3–6mm (mean = 4mm, N= 20). Overall, body moderately convex; elongate. Body coloration black with brick-red elytra, head often with orange-red area on center of vertex, and apices of maxillary and labial palpi also orange-red; some specimens with variable dark maculations on elytra (see variation below). Body distinctly setose with stiff, erect black setae. Cuticular surface moderately to distinctly shining. Head broadly triangular (W:L = 1.55: 1); surface coarsely densely punctuate with irregular shaped punctures. Punctures ~ 3 diameters of eye facet; inner surface of puncture granular; each puncture gives rise medially to a single semi-erect or decumbent seta; interspaces between punctures narrow, <0.25 diameter of puncture and smooth to finely alutaceous in microsculpture; punctures not more widely separated on temples. Antenna elongate, antennomere comparative lengths as follows: 1.0: 0.63: 0.87: 0.63: 0.63: 0.56: 0.56: 0.56: 0.56: 0.56: 1.06. Terminal antennomere longest, less than length of antennomeres 9 and 10 combined, apex acuminate. Antennomeres 1 and 3 widest, antennomere 2 distinctly shorter and more narrow than 1 or 3. Mouthparts clearly visible, well developed. Labrum not slightly transverse, wider than long (Fig. 15); anterior margin appearing truncate to broadly convex, with dense setal brush; posterior margin broadly convex. Mandibles equally setose, each large, moderately robust, longer than wide; lateral region with numerous projecting elongate setae, (Fig. 17). Maxilla with terminal palpomere bearing numerous setae at apex; lacinia with lateral margin convex; galea with apex bluntly rounded (Fig. 19). Labium with anterior margin appearing emarginate; labial palpus elongate, terminal palpomere subequal to preceeding palpomere, apex with few scattered sort setae, distinctly swollen mesally (Fig. 21). Pronotum transverse, appearing semi-rectangular, widest near anterior angles (W:L = 1.5: 1); lateral margins faintly constricted in posterior 0.33; anterior and posterior angles broadly rounded; anterior and posterior margin broadly evenly rounded. Surface punctures similar to those on head; interspaces smooth to granular, shining, 0.25– 0.5 puncture diameters apart. Scutellum with apex bluntly rounded; deeply densely punctuate as on head and pronotum, but punctures somewhat smaller; interespaces finely granular to smooth, shining. Elytron with humeri moderately well developed; sutural striae not apparent along entire length; apices moderately to bluntly rounded. Surface punctures indistinct, appearing wrinkled with alutaceous to granular sculpturing. Prosternum deeply densely punctuate, punctures small, half the size of those on head or pronotum, often coalescing into transverse punctures or lines; interspaces smooth to granular, shining. Mesosternum with distinct medial glabrous region in anterior 0.33 of structure, surface smooth to granular; punctures on remaining areas similar to those on prosternum. Metasternum similarly punctate as pro- and mesosternum, sometimes with impunctate line medially, punctures more dense laterally; interspaces smooth, shining. Legs elongate, well developed. Pro- and mesotibia with two unequal apical spurs, both spurs straight, anterior spur faintly bifid apically on protibia and trifid on mesotibia. Metatibial spurs unequal, both appearing flattened and spoon-shaped with the anterior spur somewhat shorter than posterior one. Tarsal claws complex, each claw with a ventral blade subequal to length of claw, each claw also finely denticulate from apex to 0.5–0.66 length of claw, not approximating base. Ventrites 1–5 large, subequal in length to each other; punctures large and similar to those on head and pronotum, becoming more densely spaced laterally and often coalescing into each other; interspaces variable from smooth and granular, moderately shining. Male genitalia well sclerotized. Tegmen with parameres fused, and articulated with phallobase (Figs. 11). In ventral view, parameres evenly rounded apically, with deep medial fossa and deeply convex attachment to phallobase; phallobase wider than parameres, widest in posterior 0.33; middle with distinct medial constriction, median fossa broadly shallow. In lateral view, parameres with sharp apical point and phallobase not evenly convex (Fig. 12). Median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view with sharp declivity from apex to base, and large apical field of minute projections (Fig. 13) Female genitalia weakly to moderately sclerotized. Species level diagnostic character unapparent. As above.
Description
Variation. Unlike the eastern T. sanguinipennis, this species exhibits marked color variation in the elytra (Figs. 4, 6). Most specimens collected possess elytra similar to that of T. sanguinipennis, i.e. uniformly dark brick red. However, several populations exhibit variable darkened areas on the elytra. Werner et al. (1966) noted that the elytral apices may be dark, but apparently only rarely in Arizona populations. We observed varying degrees of darkened elytra on specimens from southern California, Arizona, and New Mexico. The pronotal punctation and surface sculpture also is somewhat variable in several populations of this species, a fact that, in part, led to LeConte’s erection of T. murrayi, and the subsequent usage of that name. The number of tarsal denticulations also varies considerably. However, the male genitalia among several populations from throughout the range of T. stansburii indicate no significant differences and there was no geographic relationship between variation in color, pronotal punctation, and tarsal denticulation. These facts coupled with the known variability in color differences within other species of Nearctic Meloidae confirm the need for the synonomy of T. murrayi with T. stansburii.
Etymology
Etymology. Specific epithet is a Latinized noun in the genitive case of Stansbury, the surname of the coordinator of the expedition into the Great Salt Lake Valley and presumably the person who collected the type specimen as well.
Distribution
Distribution. Western and Central North America (Fig. 30), including: Canada (AB, BC, NWT) and the United States (AZ, CA, CO, ID, KS, MT, NE, NM, NV, OR, SD, TX, UT, WA, and WY). A record of T. stansburii in Nova Scotia, Canada by Majka et al. (2007) is undoubtedly an introduction event, as suggested by those authors, and no records prior to or subsequent to this event exist from that area. Therefore, this province of northeastern Canada has not been included in the distribution data listed here, or illustrated in the distribution map (Fig. 30). The above distribution is derived in part from our analysis as well as published records (Hatch 1965 and Campbell 1991)
Biology and Ecology
Biology.Linsley and MacSwain (1951) were the first to synthesize the known biology of T. stansburii; however, Hicks (1926) recorded the species as a "parasite" from the nests of several bee genera (see Table 2 below). Werner et al. (1966) noted that adults are sluggish early in the spring and remain near bee nests they parasitize, and that they also do not visit blossoms; however, this appears unlikely based on the number and diversity of flowers upon which they have been collected (See Table 2 below), as well as the non-larval hosts from which triungulins have been acquired. Likewise they noted that this species had been reared from cells of Hoplitis, Osmia, Anthidium, and Anthophora; and that males had been seen in flight. The latter was first proposed by Linsley and Mac- Swain (1951), who also noted never observing females in flight. Notes. The first instar larval description and diagnosis has been previously completed in detail (MacSwain 1956), and will not be repeated here; however illustrations are provided (Figs. 23, 25, 27, & 29). We have included molecular sequence data, i.e. COI barcode region, in Appendix 4 as an initial step to promote the further explorations on the biology, systematics, and evolution of this species.
Taxon Treatment
- Cline, Andrew R.; Huether, Jeffrey P.; 2011: Revision of the nearctic blister beetle genus Tricrania LeConte, 1860 (Coleoptera: Meloidae: Nemognathinae), Zootaxa 2832: 11-14. doi
This treatment was originally uploaded by Plazi, compare this treatment on Plazi. Unless this treatment has been substantially changed on Species-ID, Plazi requests to maintain a link back to the original repository.
