Streblognathus peetersi
Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Robertson2002Zootaxa97, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Robertson2002Zootaxa97">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Hymenoptera
Familia: Formicidae
Genus: Streblognathus
Name
Streblognathus peetersi Robertson, H. G., 2002 – Wikispecies link – Pensoft Profile
- Streblognathus peetersi Robertson, H. G., 2002, Zootaxa 97: 11-14.
Description
HOLOTYPE WORKER. Matching description of genus but with the following specimen-specific characters. Size. Head width 3.87 mm; Head length 3.93 mm; Eye length 0.71 mm; Scape length 3.54 mm; Pronotal width 2.54 mm; Mesonotal-propodeal length 4.66 mm; Hind tibia length 4.04 mm; Cephalic index 99; Scape index 91; Eye index 18. Head (Fig. 1a, b). Mandibles glossy smooth with sparsely distributed punctures containing hairs. Fringe of black hairs on anterior surface, behind basal margin and basal tooth. Anterior clypeal margin with middle section broadly concave, projecting beyond the outer margins and meeting them in a right angle. Compound eyes situated slightly anterior to mid-length of head. Fine puncturing on head poorly defined and smeared in appearance. Golden pubescence on head sparse to absent, limited mainly to the posterior, the central region and anterior to eyes. Antennal scapes with sparse golden pubescence overlaid by sparse decumbent black hairs. Venter of head smooth to shagreenate with sparse golden pubescence and uniformly distributed short, black hairs. Mesosoma. Propodeal dorsum in profile mainly flat but curving down slightly to the metanotal groove and terminating posteriorly in dorsally projecting short spines (Fig. 1d). Slight indentation present about one quarter of the way from the metanotal groove. No distinct lateral margins to propodeal dorsum. A hairless shallow furrow passes from the dorsal edge of the propodeal spiracle, round its posterior edge, and across to above the dorsal edge of the metapleural gland opening. Mesosoma dorsum covered in fine, ill-defined punctate sculpture, some of the punctures flowing into one another. Sides with shagreenate sculpture. Mesosoma covered in sparse, fine, golden pubescence and dorsum with scattered subdecumbent short, black, pointed hairs. Petiole (Fig. 1d). Appearing as in description of genus. Covered in sparse golden pubescence and uniformly distributed subdecumbent short black hairs. Gaster. As described for genus. PARATYPE WORKERS. Matching the description of the genus and the holotype but with the following additional variation. Size. Head width 3.83-4.12 mm; Head length 3.79-4.11 mm; Eye length 0.70-0.77 mm; Scape length 3.54-3.77 mm; Pronotal width 2.82-2.70 mm; Mesonotal-propodeal length 4.55-4.93 mm; Hind tibia length 3.91-4.26 mm; Cephalic index 98-102; Scape index 89-94; Eye index 18-19 (n=6). ALL WORKERS. Size. Head width 3.43-4.46 mm; Head length 3.60-4.50 mm; Eye length 0.62-0.85 mm; Scape length 3.28-4.12 mm; Pronotal width 2.30-2.84 mm; Mesonotal-propodeal length 4.34-5.47 mm; Hind tibia length 3.80-4.80 mm; Cephalic index 95-102; Scape index 87-98; Eye index 17-21 (n=38). PARATYPE MALES. Size. Head width 2.26-2.42 mm; Head length 1.83-1.90 mm; Eye length 1.25-1.32 mm; Ocellus diameter 0.55-0.69 mm; Forewing length 13.46-13.81 mm; Hind tibia length 4.02-4.12 mm; Cephalic index 122-128; Eye index 53-57 (n = 6). ALL MALES. Size. Head width 2.02-2.51 mm; Head length 1.62-1.97 mm; Eye length 1.12-1.41 mm; Ocellus diameter 0.42-0.69 mm; Forewing length 13.46-14.83 mm; Hind tibia length 3.83-4.38 mm; Cephalic index 121-130; Eye index 53-57 (n = 12).
Diagnosis
Diagnosis. In the worker, scape, mesosoma and legs are shorter relative to width measurements in S. peetersiHNS than in S. aethiopicusHNS (Figs 5b, e, f), with scape index being the easiest measurement to separate the two species. The relatively longer body and appendages of S. aethiopicusHNS, combined with its larger size results in Scape length, Meso-propodeal length and tibia length being longer in this species than in S. peetersiHNS. There is also only a slight degree of overlap in Eye length (Fig. 5c). Mandibles in S. aethiopicusHNS are castaneous with a black border whereas in S. peetersiHNS they are generally black although there is a small proportion of specimens with some castaneous colouration. In the male, the subgenital plate in S. peetersiHNS has convex lateral margins and the apex is broadly rounded, whereas in S. aethiopicusHNS the lateral margins are concave and the apex is flat (Figs 3c, d). The barbed apices of the penis valves are oriented vertically in S. peetersiHNS whereas in S. aethiopicusHNS, they splay outwards. In contrast, the barbs along the outer margins of the penis valves, behind the apices, are splayed outwards in S. peetersiHNS whereas in S. aethiopicusHNS they are oriented vertically.
Distribution
Distribution and habitat. Streblognathus peetersiHNS has a wide distribution in the grassland regions of eastern South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland (Fig. 6).
Etymology
Etymology. Named after Christian Peeters who drew my attention to this new species and collected the type material. It is also named after him in recognition of the substantial contribution he has made to our understanding of ponerine reproductive biology.
Type Material
SOUTH AFRICA next to Magoebaskloof Hotel C. Peeters SOUTH AFRICA next to Magoebaskloof Hotel C. Peeters SOUTH AFRICA next to Magoebaskloof Hotel C. Peeters SOUTH AFRICA next to Magoebaskloof Hotel C. Peeters SOUTH AFRICA next to Magoebaskloof Hotel C. Peeters SOUTH AFRICA next to Magoebaskloof Hotel C. Peeters SOUTH AFRICA next to Magoebaskloof Hotel C. Peeters SOUTH AFRICA next to Magoebaskloof Hotel C. Peeters SOUTH AFRICA next to Magoebaskloof Hotel C. Peeters SOUTH AFRICA next to Magoebaskloof Hotel C. Peeters SOUTH AFRICA next to Magoebaskloof Hotel J. de Oliveira SOUTH AFRICA next to Magoebaskloof Hotel J. de Oliveira SOUTH AFRICA next to Magoebaskloof Hotel C. Peeters
Materials Examined
LESOTHO Bokong N. R. H. Geertsema Lesotho Haha-la-Sekhonyana A. Jacot-Guillarmod Lesotho Katse H. Geertsema Lesotho Likhoele Dieterlin Lesotho Makheke Mnts 10 miles ENE Mokhotlong P. Brinck, G. Rudebeck Lesotho Mamathes Nat. Mus. S. Rhodesia Lesotho Mamathes C. Jacot-Guillarmod Lesotho Mamathes C. Jacot-Guillarmod Lesotho Mamohau H. Geertsema Lesotho Masite J. Hewitt Lesotho Mokhotlong, 7200 ft P. Brinck, G. Rudebeck Lesotho Qachas Nek C. Jacot-Guillarmod SOUTH AFRICA Queenstown to Jamestown A. J. Prins, A. Prins South Africa Rhodes P. Brinck, G. Rudebeck South Africa Bethlehem C. P. van der Merwe South Africa Clarens, Langkrans C. Peeters South Africa Golden Gate H. J. Greyling South Africa Cathedral Peak area, Catchment XIV, 1920 - 1930 m alt. I. Pajor South Africa Cathedral Peak area, catchment XV, 1950 m I. Pajor South Africa Champagne Castle B. V. W. South Africa Clovelly Farm, c 6 km from Underberg, Camp V 6 H. G. Robertson South Africa Giant's Castle C. Peeters South Africa Impendle J. Kotze South Africa Kloof H. W. Bell Marley South Africa Krantz Kloof H. W. Bell Marley South Africa Maqwaza [= Maquasa] H. W. Bell Marley South Africa Mfongosi, Zululand W. E. Jones South Africa 6 miles from Nkandla to Qudeni J. H. Grobler South Africa Nongoma, Zululand C. Fuller South Africa Nongomi J. J. Nel South Africa Ntendeka Forest Reserve, 27 km E of Vryheid M. H. Villet South Africa Qudeni J. H. Grobler South Africa Underberg N. P. Hill South Africa Vernon Crookes Nature Reserve, ZI 3 C. Peeters South Africa Entabeni Forest Reserve G. L. Prinsloo South Africa Koedoes-Riv. H. G. Breyer South Africa Shiluvane Junod South Africa Tzaneen A. Turner South Africa Barberton H. Edwards South Africa Barberton J. S. Taylor South Africa Barberton J. S. Taylor South Africa Marieps Mountain G. van Son South Africa Nelspruit, 2528 DB E. de Wet South Africa Nelspruit, 2531 DA M. Jansson South Africa Nelspruit 2530 BD E. Anastassiades South Africa Stentor Estate, Dist. Kaapmuiden A. Nel South Africa Uitsuk Forest Station S. Endrody-Younga SWAZILAND Piggspeak, Swaziland J. A. Warrens
Discussion
Discussion There is quite extensive size variation in S. peetersiHNS with the head width of the smallest measured worker only 77% of that in the largest worker whereas for S. aethiopicusHNS it is 86%. Most of the size variation has a geographical basis, with workers in southern KwaZulu-Natal, Lesotho and Free State being smaller than those further north in northern KwaZulu-Natal, Swaziland, Mpumalanga and Limpopo Province. The large, recurved barbs on the penis valves are possibly an adaptation for preventing easy removal of the genitalia after insemination. Monnin and Peeters (1998) showed in Dinoponera quadricepsHNS, that a male did not withdraw his genitalia after insemination of a receptive worker, and instead the worker used her mandibles to cut off the genitalia from the male and then spent about 30 minutes removing the genitalia from inside herself. Once removed, she was no longer receptive to further mating by other males. The male genitalia in D. quadricepsHNS therefore act as a mating plug, preventing further insemination by other males. As there is only one receptive 'alpha' worker per nest, who prevents mating by other workers, the reproductive interests of the male are best served by committing himself suicidally to a single mating, rather than withdrawing, exposing the receptive worker to mating by other males, and running the high risk of not locating another receptive worker at another nest. As StreblognathusHNS is also monogynous, the recurved barbs on the male penis valves are probably also to secure the male genitalia in the worker's bursa copulatrix so that the genitalia act as a mating plug. The fact that the barbs in StreblognathusHNS are so much larger than those in DinoponeraHNS (personal observations), suggests that perhaps an even more persistent mating plug occurs in this genus.
Taxon Treatment
- Robertson, H. G.; 2002: Revision of the ant genus Streblognathus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae)., Zootaxa 97: 11-14. doi
This treatment was originally uploaded by Plazi, compare this treatment on Plazi. Unless this treatment has been substantially changed on Species-ID, Plazi requests to maintain a link back to the original repository.