Splanchnotrophus imagawai
| Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Uyeno2012ZooKeys247, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Uyeno2012ZooKeys247">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Poecilostomatoida
Familia: Splanchnotrophidae
Genus: Splanchnotrophus
Name
Splanchnotrophus imagawai Uyeno & Nagasawa, 2012 sp. n. – Wikispecies link – Japanese name: uzu-himawari-umiushi-yadori ZooBank link – Pensoft Profile
Type material
Holotype: female, ex body cavity of Trapania miltabrancha Gosliner & Fahey (Nudibranchia: Goniodorididae), off Red Beach, Kin, Okinawa-jima Island, North Pacific Ocean, Japan (26°26'41"N, 127°54'39"E), 15 m depth, 23 April 2009 (NSMT–Cr 22249). Paratype: 1 female, ex body cavity of Trapania miltabrancha, off Red Beach, Kin, Okinawa-jima Island, North Pacific Ocean, Japan (26°26'41"N, 127°54'39"E), 15 m depth, 29 May 2008 (RUMF–ZC–02105).
Type locality
off Red Beach, Kin, Okinawa-jima Island, North Pacific Ocean, Japan (26°26'41"N, 127°54'39"E).
Description of holotype female
Body (Figure 8A) 1.86 long, composed of swollen prosome and small 2-segmented urosome. Prosome composed of anterior region as cephalosome, middle region comprising first and second pedigerous somites, and posterior region as third pedigerous somite. Cephalosome (Figure 8B) not elongated, broad and unarmed with protruded rostral region (Figure 9A). Middle region (Figure 8B) compact, about as wide as long, bearing 3 pairs of lateral processes, without posterolateral processes. Posterior region (Figure 8B, C) broad, bearing paired bulbs carrying leg 3 on tip. Lateral processes (Figure 8A) long and slender, about twice as long as body length. Urosome (Figure 8C, D) small; genito-abdomen ampulla-like posterior portion bearing paired apertures without posterolateral lobes; opercula bearing small shield-like structure with 2 spiniform processes. Caudal ramus (Figure 8E) small, about 1.5 times as long as wide, bearing 6 setae and 2 dorsal spiniform processes; apical seta long, styliform.
Antennule (Figure 9A, B) 2-segmented; terminal segment divided by 2 constrictions making it appearing as original segmentation; proximal segment bearing 2 blunt spines; terminal segment bearing 2 blunt spines and 1 seta in proximal part, 3 setae and 1 blunt element in middle part, and 9 setae and 2 blunt elements in distal part. Antenna (Figure 9A, C) 3-segmented; coxo-basis broad, bearing 1 medial spine; proximal segment of endopod bearing 1 medial spine; terminal segment of endopod drawn out into strong apical claw, with 2 spines and 2 setal elements. Labrum (Figure 9A, C) bilobate, bearing flat surface. Mandible (Figure 9A, C, D) spatulate, tapering into single curved blade without dentiform processes. Labium (Figure 9A, C) with two patches of spinules. Maxillule not observed. Paragnath (Figure 9C) represented by pinnate lobe. Maxilla (Figure 9C, E) 2-segmented; syncoxa unarmed; allobasis tapering into spiniform process and bearing seta. Maxilliped absent.
Legs 1 and 2 (Figures 8B, 9F, G) unsegmented, weakly sclerotized; protopod bearing outer basal seta, largely incorporated into ventral wall of prosome; elongate exopodal lobe separated from small endopodal lobe; exopodal lobe drawn out into long process bearing multiple constrictions, wrinkly surface, and 4 setal elements; endopodal lobe bulbous, bearing spiniform apical element. Leg 3 (Figures 8C, 9H) represented by conical process with apical seta.
Egg sacs (Figure 8F) bilobate, bearing curved side and spiral side; dull white in live color (Figure 1E, F).
Variation of female morphology. The morphology of the female paratype is as in the holotype. The specimens from type series (n = 2) range from 0.71-1.86 (1.28 ± 0.81) BL.
Male
Unknown.
Site
Female specimens were found in the body cavity of host nudibranchs. They grasped the host’s visceral sac by the lateral processes. Only the posterior tip of the urosome and the egg sacs were exposed from the host’s gill circle (Figure 1E, F).
Etymology
The specific name “imagawai” honours the collector of this new species, Mr. Kaoru Imagawa who is a professional diver. The discovery of the new species was brought by his extraordinary ability to find small nudibranch gastropods.
Remarks
The female of the new species differs from Splanchnotrophus angulatus, Splanchnotrophus dellachiajei, Splanchnotrophus gacilis and Splanchnotrophus willemi in the absence of posterolateral processes on the prosome (vs. present, see Hancock and Norman 1863[1]; Canu 1891[2]; Delamare Deboutteville 1950[3]; Huys 2001[4]). Splanchnotrophus helianthus sp. n. lacks such processes but differs clearly from the new species in the following characters in females: the anterior region of the prosome is elongate and bent to ventral (vs. not elongate); the middle region of the prosome has a constriction posterior to the base of the first lateral processes (vs. without constriction); the genito-abdomen possesses posterolateral lobes (vs. without lobes); the mandible bears dentiform processes (vs. without processes); the endopodal lobe of leg 1 is adpressed to the exopodal lobe via the small protopod (vs. the endopodal lobe separated from the exopodal lobe); and leg 3 is located on the third pedigerous somite directly (vs. leg 3 located on the apex of paired bulbs).
Original Description
- Uyeno, D; Nagasawa, K; 2012: Four new species of splanchnotrophid copepods (Poecilostomatoida) parasitic on doridacean nudibranchs (Gastropoda, Opistobranchia) from Japan, with proposition of one new genus ZooKeys, 247: 1-29. doi
Other References
- ↑ Hancock A, Norman A (1863) On Splanchnotrophus, an undescribed genus of Crustacea, parasitic on Nudibranchiate Mollusca. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology 24: 49-60.
- ↑ Canu E (1891) Sur quelques Copépodes parasites, observés dans le Boulonnais. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris 113: 435-437.
- ↑ Delamare Deboutteville C (1950) Contribution à la connaissance des Copépodes du genre Splanchnotrophus Hancock et Norman parasites de Mollusques. Vie et Milieu 1: 1-7.
- ↑ Huys R (2001) Splanchnotrophid systematics: a case of polyphyly and taxonomic myopia. Journal of Crustacean Biology 21: 106-156. doi: [0106:SSACOP2.0.CO;2 10.1651/0278-0372(2001)021[0106:SSACOP]2.0.CO;2]
Images
|
