Liphistius pyinoolwin
Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Xu2021ZooKeys1031, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Xu2021ZooKeys1031">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Araneae
Familia: Liphistiidae
Genus: Liphistius
Name
Liphistius pyinoolwin Xu & Yu & Aung & Yu & Liu & Lwin & Sang & Li, 2021 sp. nov. – Wikispecies link – ZooBank link – Pensoft Profile
- Liphistius birmanicus Platnick & Sedgwick, 1984: 8 (only 2♂♂ 5♀♀ from Pyin Oo Lwin, Mandalay Region, Myanmar, alt. 1150 m; collected by W. Sedgwick on 13 July 1982; deposited in AMNH (2♂♂ 4♀♀; examined) and MCZ (1♀; not examined)), misidentification, partim; Schwendinger, 1990: 331–332 (illustration based on 2♂♂ 4♀♀ (AMNH)), misidentification.
Type material
Holotype: Mynamar · ♂; Mandalay Region, Pyin Oo Lwin District, Pyin Oo Lwin township, Anesakhan Village, near Dat Taw Gyaint Waterfall Resort, the View Resort & Restaurant; 21.98°N, 96.38°E; alt. 908 m; 13 July 2018; D. Li, F.X. Liu, X. Xu and L. Yu leg.; XUX–2018–089. Paratypes: Myanmar · 7 ♂♂, 15 ♀♀; same data as for the holotype; XUX–2018–090, 093, 094, 096, 098, 099A, 102, 103, 103A, 104, 104A, 105, 106, 107–110, 110A, 110B, 110C, 111, 111A.
Other material: Myanmar · 1 ♂, 4 ♀♀ (AMNH; examined); Mandalay, Pyin Oo Lwin; alt. 1150 m; 13 July 1982; W. Sedgwick leg.; AMNH_IZC 00356855 (♂; matured on 14 October 1982, died on 23 February 1983), AMNH_IZC 00356856 (♀; moulted on 28 February 1983, died on 17 April 1983), AMNH_IZC 00356857 (♀; moulted on 27 January 1983, died on 14 February 1983), AMNH_IZC 00356858 (♀; died on 15 October 1982), AMNH_IZC 00356859 (♀; moulted on 6 November 1982, died on 1 March 1983).
Diagnosis
Males of L. pyinoolwin sp. nov. can be distinguished from those of L. birmanicus, L. lahu Schwendinger, 1998, L. lordae, and L. pinlaung by the presence of a lateral process on the paracymbium (Figs 3A, H, I, 4B); from those of L. birmanicus by the larger tibial apophysis (Fig. 3A, B, H, I), the plane cumulus (Figs 3A, B, H–J, 4A), the smaller paraembolic plate (Figs 3A–J, 4F, G), and the wider shorter contrategular process (Figs 3E, 4F); from those of L. lahu by the narrower tegulum (Figs 3C, F, J, 4F, G); from those of L. lordae by the wider tibial apophysis at base (Figs 3A, B, H, I, 4B), and the shorter, less regularly arranged setae on the cumulus (Figs 3A, B, H, I, 4A); from those of L. pinlaung by the tegulum with a slightly dentated margin (Figs 3C, F, J, 4F). Females of L. pyinoolwin sp. nov. resemble those of L. birmanicus, L. hpruso and L. pinlaung by the poreplate with two pairs of lobes, but can be distinguished from those of L. birmanicus and L. pinlaung by the small, narrower posterior stalk (Figs 5D–I, 6D, E, G, H, 7B–I), as well as the narrower, longer receptacular cluster (Figs 5G–I, 6G–I, 7C, G–I); from those of L. hpruso by the poreplate with larger anterior lobes (Figs 5D–I, 6D–I, 7A–I); from those of the other Liphistius by the poreplate with four anterior lobes (Figs 5G–I, 6G–H, 7A–I).
Description
Male (holotype). Total length, excluding chelicerae, 13.95. Carapace 6.03 long and 6.17 wide, black brown, furnished with a few short, scattered bristles. ALE>PLE>PME>AME, eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.10, ALE 0.60, PME 0.21, PLE 0.42, AME–AME 0.07, AME–ALE 0.09, PME–PME 0.11, PME–PLE 0.08, ALE–PLE 0.09, ALE–ALE 0.06, PLE–PLE 0.36, AME–PME 0.09. Chelicerae robust, promargin of chelicerae groove with 12 strong denticles of variable size. Labium 0.61 long and 1.09 wide, wider than long, fused with sternum. Sternum 2.77 long and 1.03 wide, longer than wide, and a few weakly spined setae on the anterior tip and many long spined setae on the posterior tip, elongated posterior tip. Opisthosoma 6.71 long and 5.00 wide, black, with 12 tergites, the fifth largest, 8 spinnerets. Legs without distinct annulations. Superior tarsal claws of anterior legs with 3 or 4 teeth, of posteriors with 4. Measurements: leg I 15.73 (4.42 + 1.39 + 3.78 + 3.80 + 2.34), leg II 16.16 (4.31 + 1.36 + 3.49 + 4.38 + 2.62), leg III 18.09 (4.15 + 1.34 + 4.16 + 5.68 + 2.76), leg IV 23.69 (5.66 + 1.57 + 5.18 + 7.66 + 3.62).
Palp: Tibial apophysis very broad at base, with four long, stouter setae with similar lengths and a few short spines (Figs 3A–C, H–J, 4A–C); paracymbium wide, with pointed lateral process and many setae situated at the tip, and several tapering spines on the plane cumulus (Figs 3A, B, H, I, 4A); subtegular apophysis well developed (Figs 3C, F, J, 4F, G); contrategulum with a conical, short, blunt-tipped process (Figs 3D–F, 4E), distal edge widely arched, with a smooth sharp projection (Figs 3B, D, F, G, 4F, G); tegulum small, with a slightly dentated margin (Figs 3C, F, J, 4F, G); paraembolic plate short, widely rounded (Figs 3A–J, 4E–G); embolus short conical, basally sclerotized, with 6 longitudinal ridges that reach the tip, embolic parts adjacent (Figs 3A–J, 4C–G).
Female (XUX–2018–094, Fig. 2D). Total length, excluding chelicerae, 10.40. Carapace 4.79 long, 4.72 wide, light brown, furnished with few short, scattered bristles (Fig. 2D). Eight eyes on darkened ocular tubercle, ALE > PLE > PME > AME. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.06, ALE 0.45, PME 0.19, PLE 0.35; AME–AME 0.08, AME–ALE 0.10, PME–PME 0.05, PME–PLE 0.10, ALE–PLE 0.05, ALE–ALE 0.10, PLE–PLE 0.33, AME–PME 0.06. Chelicerae light and glabrous proximally, robust, dark brown; promargin of chelicerae groove with 11–12 denticles of variable size. Labium 0.59 long, 1.25 wide. Sternum 2.55 long, 1.23 wide, light brown with several setae. Opisthosoma 5.44 long, 3.84 wide, brown, with 12 tergites, and 8 spinnerets. Legs brown with strong hairs and spines, long and short black sparse setae, with three tarsal claws. Measurements: palp 7.89 (2.84 + 1.05 + 1.98 + 2.02), leg I 10.16 (3.33 + 1.32 + 2.22 + 1.90 + 1.39), leg II 9.95 (3.15 + 1.07 + 2.14 + 2.03 + 1.56), leg III 11.10 (3.18 + 1.19 + 2.55 + 2.58 + 1.60), leg IV 15.60 (4.41 + 1.24 + 3.53 + 3.91 + 2.51).
Female genitalia: Posterior margin of genital sternite curved (Figs 5A–C, 6A–C, 7A); approximately rectangular poreplate wider than long, with a pair of large, well separated anterior lobes and a pair of small anterolateral lobes; the anterior lobes very close to the anterolateral lobes (Figs 5D–I, 6D–I, 7B–I); transition between poreplate and posterior stalk distinct (Figs 5D–I, 6D, E, G, H, 7B–I); posterior stalk long, narrow; racemose receptacular cluster long and narrow, central dorsal opening sphere-shaped (Figs 5D–F, 6D–F, 7D–F).
Etymology
The species epithet “pyinoolwin” is a toponym referring to the type locality.
Distribution
Myanmar (Mandalay Region).
Variation
Body size: males (N=8): BL 8.63–13.95, CL 4.23–6.03, CW 4.87–6.17, OL 3.76–6.71, OW 2.85–5.17; females (N=15): BL 10.40–14.21, CL 4.79–6.37, CW 4.55–5.91, OL 5.44–8.10, OW 3.84–6.27; The examined females have different genitalia, including the specimen XUX–2018–110, which lack the posterior stalk (Fig. 6F, 6I); the shape of the anterior and anterolateral lobes of the poreplate is variable (Figs 5G–I, 6G–I, 7C, 7G–I); In some specimens, the receptacular cluster is beyond the anterior margin of the poreplate dorsally (Figs 5D, 6D, 7A, D, E), whereas in others are not (Figs 5E, F, 6E, F, 7B, F), and the size and shape of the receptacular cluster may be slightly different (Figs 5G–I, 6G–I, C, G–I); the shape and size of the central dorsal opening are also variable (Figs 5D–F, 6D–F, 7B, D–F).
Remarks
We examined 8 males and 15 females collected from Pyin Oo Lwin by us, as well as 1 male and 4 females collected by W. Sedgwick on 13 July 1982, which were used to redescribe L. birmanicus by Platnick and Sedgwick (1984)[1] and reviewed by Schwendinger (1990)[2]. After examined the male and females collected by W. Sedgwick, even though the male palp was distorted (Fig. 4A–C), we can still identify it as the same as the descriptions and illustrations by Platnick and Sedgwick (1984)[1], and the same as the males and females collected by us at Pyin Oo Lwin.
Original Description
- Xu, X; Yu, L; Aung, K; Yu, L; Liu, F; Lwin, W; Sang, M; Li, D; 2021: A new species of Liphistius from Myanmar and description of the actual male of L. birmanicus Thorell, 1897 (Araneae, Mesothelae, Liphistiidae) ZooKeys, 1031: 41-58. doi
Images
|
Other References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Platnick N, Sedgwick W (1984) A revision of the spider genus Liphistius (Araneae, Mesothelae).American Museum Novitates2781: 1–31.
- ↑ Schwendinger P (1990) On the spider genus Liphistius (Araneae: Mesothelae) in Thailand and Burma.Zoologica Scripta19: 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.1990.tb00262.x