Isophya dochia

From Species-ID
Jump to: navigation, search
Notice: This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.

If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly.

This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Iorgu I (2012) Acoustic analysis reveals a new cryptic bush–cricket in the Carpathian Mountains (Orthoptera, Phaneropteridae). ZooKeys 254 : 1–22, doi. Versioned wiki page: 2012-12-27, version 29768, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Isophya_dochia&oldid=29768 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.

Citation formats to copy and paste

BibTeX:

@article{Iorgu2012ZooKeys254,
author = {Iorgu, Ionuţ Ştefan},
journal = {ZooKeys},
publisher = {Pensoft Publishers},
title = {Acoustic analysis reveals a new cryptic bush–cricket in the Carpathian Mountains (Orthoptera, Phaneropteridae)},
year = {2012},
volume = {254},
issue = {},
pages = {1--22},
doi = {10.3897/zookeys.254.3892},
url = {http://www.pensoft.net/journals/zookeys/article/3892/abstract},
note = {Versioned wiki page: 2012-12-27, version 29768, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Isophya_dochia&oldid=29768 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.}

}

RIS/ Endnote:

TY - JOUR
T1 - Acoustic analysis reveals a new cryptic bush–cricket in the Carpathian Mountains (Orthoptera, Phaneropteridae)
A1 - Iorgu I
Y1 - 2012
JF - ZooKeys
JA -
VL - 254
IS -
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.254.3892
SP - 1
EP - 22
PB - Pensoft Publishers
M1 - Versioned wiki page: 2012-12-27, version 29768, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Isophya_dochia&oldid=29768 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.

M3 - doi:10.3897/zookeys.254.3892

Wikipedia/ Citizendium:

<ref name="Iorgu2012ZooKeys254">{{Citation
| author = Iorgu I
| title = Acoustic analysis reveals a new cryptic bush–cricket in the Carpathian Mountains (Orthoptera, Phaneropteridae)
| journal = ZooKeys
| year = 2012
| volume = 254
| issue =
| pages = 1--22
| pmid =
| publisher = Pensoft Publishers
| doi = 10.3897/zookeys.254.3892
| url = http://www.pensoft.net/journals/zookeys/article/3892/abstract
| pmc =
| accessdate = 2020-07-16

}} Versioned wiki page: 2012-12-27, version 29768, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Isophya_dochia&oldid=29768 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.</ref>

See also the citation download page at the journal.


Taxonavigation

Ordo: Orthoptera
Familia: Phaneropteridae
Genus: Isophya

Name

Isophya dochia Iorgu, 2012 sp. n.Wikispecies linkZooBank linkPensoft Profile

Type locality

Romania, Eastern Carpathian Mountains, Ceahlău Mountains.

Type material

Holotype: male. Original label: “România, Munţii Ceahlău, Poliţa cu Ariniş, 46°57.90'N, 25°56.32'E, alt. 1620 m, 09.08.2005, Leg. Iorgu I. Ş.”
Paratypes: 10 ♂♂ 7 ♀♀, labeled: “România, Munţii Ceahlău, Cabana Dochia, 46°57.94'N, 25°57.02'E, alt. 1740 m, 02.07.2010, Leg. Iorgu I. Ş.”; 6 ♂♂ 5 ♀♀, labeled: “România, Munţii Ceahlău, Piatra Lată, 46°57.73'N, 25°56.93'E, alt. 1720 m, 10.07.2012, Leg. Iorgu I. Ş”, a microSD card containing audio and video records of male song attached; coll. “Grigore Antipa” National Museum of Natural History, Bucharest, Romania.

Audio recordings

8 ♂♂, 5 July 2010, in laboratory, air temperature 25°C; 17 ♂♂, 10 July 2012, in the field, air temperature 20°C; 5 ♂♂ 5 ♀♀, 12 July 2012, in laboratory, air temperature 24°C (see Appendix 2: Isophya dochia sp n audio and Appendix 3: Isophya dochia sp n video).

Comparative material

(see Appendix: 4 Isophya comparative material).

Description

(Figs 12–22; Table 1). Male. Fastigium verticis slightly tapering frontward, half as wide as scapus, with a dorsal groove (Fig. 12). Head length 1.7 times the pronotum length and head width about 1.3 times the maximum pronotum width. Pronotum saddle shaped from a lateral view, paranota with concave dorsal margins, anterior and ventral borders straight, posterior edge moderately convex. Pronotal disc slightly constricted in the transverse sulcus area, with lateral carinae marginally divergent in mesozona and convex in metazona (Figs 12, 13). Wings as long as or slightly longer than pronotum, with reticulate venation, usually surpass the posterior edge of first abdominal tergite. Cu2 vein length about 3/4 the posterior margin of pronotum; angle between cubital veins about 70°. Speculum large and rectangular. Edge of tegmen at distal end of Cu2 vein forms an obtuse angle of about 130° (Fig. 12). During the quiet wing openings in song production, the white anterior border of tegmen is well visible, but its role has not been established yet (see Appendix 3: Isophya dochia sp n video). Stridulatory file arcuate, 2.2–2.4 mm long, counts 82–89 teeth; distal teeth larger and rarer than proximal ones (Fig. 16). Epiproct about twice as wide as long; cercus slender, narrowing towards tip, slightly curved in its apical fourth, with fine, small hairs; terminal denticle located in middle of cercus apex (Fig. 14). Subgenital plate elongated, narrowed apically, with triangular apical incision (Fig. 15). Hind femur about 4–4.3 times the pronotum length, without ventral spines. Coloration green, densely punctuated with fine, dark green and brown spots. Several males with two dorso–lateral, parallel stripes from pronotum to end of abdomen, red, orange, white, violet or yellow colored. Antennae greenish–brown or reddish–brown, with light brown or green scapus. Compound eyes bicolor: upper part brownish–red and lower part green. A yellowish or white band begins behind the eye and ends at posterolateral angle of wing. Tegmina brown, dark brown or dark red, apically green and costal margin greenish–white or yellowish–white. Cerci brown or reddish–brown, green at base. Ventral side of body yellowish–green. Femora, tibiae and tarsi usually green, brownish or reddish.
Female. Fastigium roughly as in male (Fig. 17). Head length 1.7 times the pronotum length and head width about 1.3 times the maximum pronotum width. Pronotum disc marginally enlarged in its posterior part, with straight lateral carinae, paranota as in males (Figs 17, 18). Wing with dense reticulate venation, surpass the posterior margin of first abdominal tergite. Stridulatory bristles located on cubital veins in the inner latero–posterior part of right tegmen (Fig. 19). Cercus short, hairy, conical (Fig. 20). Subgenital plate rounded, narrow, about twice as wide as long (Fig. 21). Ovipositor short, upcurved, 1.9–2.1 times the pronotum length, upper margin with 9–10 denticles and lower margin with 8–9 denticles (Fig. 22). Hind femur 3.5–3.7 times the pronotum length, without ventral spines. Body coloration as in males, wings light brown or green–yellowish, ovipositor green.

Bioacoustics

Males stridulate at dusk and during the night, rarely during daytime. The tegmino–tegminal stridulation consists of groups of 5–18 syllables (mean±SD: 8.9±3.48, n=30 ♂♂). A group lasts for 1288–4761 ms and successive groups are separated by an interval of 157–326 ms. Groups have a repetition rate of about 10–25 per minute, depending on the number of syllables.
Two types of syllables may be observed in a group: “A” type and “B” type. Both syllable types are produced when the male closes its tegmina. The song pattern may be formulated as “A...AB–A...AB–A...AB–A...AB” and so on, where the unit “A...AB” forms a distinct group of syllables, “...” means a variable number of “A” syllables and “–” means the interval between successive groups of syllables. The “A” type syllable is formed of a compact series of 9–29 impulses (mean±SD: 18.6±6.31), lasting for 30–70 ms (mean±SD: 50.74±12.83). The “B” type syllable is formed of a compact series of 9–15 impulses (mean±SD: 12.36±2.1), lasting for 30–59 ms (mean±SD: 39.3±9.4) and always followed by a series of 1–4 after–clicks at an interval of 621–1655 ms (mean±SD: 1109.1±212.65). The production of the last syllable (“B” type) in each sequence is complex: the male partially closes tegmina, then holds them half–closed for about 621–1655 ms, and finally completely closes the wings with the after–clicks. This late production of after–clicks may function as the trigger element for female acoustic answer. Another possibility is that longer silent gaps may help the male to save up energy or simply listen to its environment, in order to detect possible threats or other singing males (Orci et al. 2010b[1], Szövényi et al. 2012[2]).
The impulse interval is about 3–6 ms in all syllables and the acoustic signal slowly decreases in amplitude from beginning to end. In a group, the following syllable begins 60–131 ms (mean±SD: 96.28±24.62) later (Figs 23, 24). The carrier wave has the strongest components between 20–40 kHz, with the highest peak at about 29 kHz.
Females find males by phonotaxis and if willing to mate with the singing male (Fig. 7), they produce isolated impulses. In the resulting male–female duet, the female stridulates only after the male after–clicks (ending part of “B” syllable), with a latency of 13–34 ms (mean±SD: 25.66±6.42, n=12 responses from 3 females) (Fig. 25).

Distribution and ecology

Isophya dochia sp. n. populates mesophytic subalpine meadows at about 1600–1900 m, in Ceahlău Mountain Massif, Eastern Carpathians (Fig. 11). The specimens were collected from leaves of Urtica, Rubus, Veratrum, Rumex, Aconitum, Vaccinium, Hypericum, Stachys, Junniperus etc. Few other bush–crickets and grasshoppers were found occurring simpatrically with the new species: Metrioptera bicolor (Philippi), Metrioptera brachyptera (Linnaeus), Pholidoptera transsylvanica (Fischer), Miramella ebneri (Galvagni), Euthystira brachyptera (Ocskay), Myrmeleotettix maculatus (Thunberg), Chorthippus biguttulus (Linnaeus), Chorthippus parallelus (Zetterstedt) etc. The bush–cricket Isophya dochia sp. n. has the same phenology as other subalpine Isophya species: female lays her eggs isolated in holes bitten in broad leaves of Urtica, Rubus etc. Eggs pass the winter in the litter and larvae hatch in late spring, after the snow melts in the high mountains. Depending on weather, first adults exuviate in late June and live up to August.

Etymology

A noun in apposition; from the name of Dochia, a Romanian legendary female character based on an earlier deity of land and agriculture from the Dacian pantheon, and that of the eponymous rock in Ceahlău Mountains.

Discussions

(see Appendix 5: Isophya harzi, Appendix 6: Isophya camptoxypha, Appendix 7: Isophya ciucasi, Appendix 8: Isophya sicula, Appendix 9: Isophya nagyi).
Discovery of the bush–cricket Isophya dochia sp. n. is surprising, especially as it is a morphological cryptic species closely related to Isophya camptoxypha. Some other recently described species, Isophya ciucasi, Isophya nagyi and Isophya sicula, show high resemblance in morphology, while Isophya harzi Kis has a similar calling song (Figs 26–37). The song of these six species can be readily distinguished as syllables grouped in short sequences (Isophya dochia sp. n. and Isophya harzi) or arranged in series (Isophya camptoxypha, Isophya ciucasi, Isophya nagyi and Isophya sicula).
Both Isophya dochia sp. n. and Isophya harzi stridulate well defined assemblies of syllables (Figs 26, 27, 32, 33). Two other species have similar song patterns: Isophya posthumoidalis Bazyluk, distributed in Poland, Slovakia and N Romania (Szövényi and Orci 2008[3]) and Isophya beybienkoi Mařan, known so far only from a very small area in SE Slovakia. In all these four species, males produce long sequences in which two types of syllables may be noticed: “A” and “B”, the rhythm of the whole song being a constant repetition that may be formulated as “A...AB–A...AB–A...AB” (in Isophya dochia sp. n. andIsophya harzi), “A...A–B–A...A–B–A...A” (in Isophya posthumoidalis) and “A...A–BA...A–BA...A” (in Isophya beybienkoi). The descriptions of calling songs of Isophya posthumoidalis and Isophya beybienkoi (Orci et al. 2001[4], Heller et al. 2004[5], Orci et al. 2010a[6]) suggest that syllable types are very different from Isophya dochia sp. n.: in Isophya posthumoidalis, syllable “A” consists of a compact series of 5–10 impulses, lasting for 12–15 ms, and syllable “B” is a single impulse followed by 1–3 after–clicks, while in Isophya beybienkoi syllable “A” is formed of 5–13 impulses, lasting for 10-32 ms, and syllable “B” consists of a compact series of 2–9 short impulses followed by a longer one and 1–3 after–clicks. Not possessing any personal data on these two species, their songs and morphology were not illustrated in present paper.
In Isophya camptoxypha, the syllable is a short and compact series of impulses, lacking or followed by one (extremely rare 2–7) after–click (Figs 28, 34). Males of Isophya ciucasi stridulate a shorter syllable, but followed by a very high number of after–clicks, usually 10–30 (Figs 29, 35). Isophya sicula produces the shortest known syllables within this genus, consisting of only 1–3 impulses, missing or followed by one (extremely rare 2–5) after–click (Figs 30, 36). Finally, the song of Isophya nagyi is the most interesting, syllables being divided in two or three distinct fragments: the first one is an opening syllable and last two are part of the same closing syllable (Figs 31, 37). During our studies, less than 1% of analyzed syllables contained all three components, males usually producing sounds only when closing the tegmina.
Another interesting feature of the song in some of these species is the similarity of time–windows when after–clicks are produced: usually 50–80 ms after the syllable, but up to 151 ms in Isophya camptoxypha (Heller et al. 2004[5]) and up to 110 ms in Isophya sicula. After–clicks may also follow both types of syllables of Isophya harzi. However, we observed a longer after–click delay (75–202 ms) next to the “B” syllable of the sequence and a shorter delay after the “A” syllables (40–90 ms). The longest after–click delay is found in Isophya dochia sp. n., up to 1655 ms.
A remarkable interspecific variation in this group is the number of teeth on male stridulatory file (Figs 63–68), which may be correlated with the total length and number of impulses in the unit syllable + gap + after–clicks, meaning a total closing stroke of wing. In the species that sing well defined groups of syllables: in Isophya harzi, 98–130 pegs produce a total number of 37–59 impulses lasting for 94–418 ms in the “B” syllable and 23–55 impulses lasting for 75–258 ms in the “A” syllable, while in Isophya dochia sp. n., the 82–89 pegs produce a total number of 9–29 impulses lasting for 30–70 ms in the first syllables from a group (“A” type) and 10–19 impulses lasting for 960–1770 ms in the last syllable (“B” type). In the species that stridulate ungrouped syllables: 65–85 pegs in Isophya ciucasi produce 13–56 impulses lasting for 209–438 ms, 50–80 pegs in Isophya camptoxypha produce 10–39 impulses, total duration of 27–363 ms, 48–60 pegs in Isophya sicula produce a total number of 1–8 impulses lasting for 52–265 ms. In Isophya nagyi, the high number of teeth on the stridulatory file, i.e. 102–109, produce a song of 36–108 impulses lasting for 167–793 ms (Table 2). All these differences in syllable production time are caused by slower or faster species–specific wing movements.
Female response as male acceptance is formed of isolated impulses, always produced after a particular part of male song, which supposedly acts as trigger. In both Isophya dochia sp. n. and Isophya harzi (n=13 responses from 3 ♀♀), the female replies only after the male’s “B” type syllable. The same behavior was noticed in females from Isophya posthumoidalis and Isophya beybienkoi (Orci et al. 2001[4], Orci et al. 2010a[6]). Females of Isophya camptoxypha, Isophya ciucasi and Isophya sicula reply right after the male’s syllable main part. In Isophya camptoxypha, female response is produced immediately after the male’s after–click (n=19 responses from 3 ♀♀), while in Isophya ciucasi (n=37 responses from 6 ♀♀) and Isophya sicula (n=10 responses from 1 ♀) its answer is apparently not affected by male after–clicks. Females of Isophya nagyi stridulate only after the last component of the male syllable (n=25 responses from 4 ♀♀) (Figs 38–43).
Spectrographic analysis of sound reveals that in all six species the frequency ranges somewhere within interval 10–40 kHz, the maximum being recorded at about 20–30 kHz (Fig. 44).
In the six related species, males of Isophya harzi and Isophya sicula can be easily separated morphologically from Isophya camptoxypha, Isophya ciucasi, Isophya nagyi and Isophya dochia sp. n. Isophya harzi is more massive, males having shorter wings, marginal angle of tegmina less obtuse (110°), number of stridulatory teeth larger, and females having a longer ovipositor (11–13 mm). Males of Isophya sicula have a narrow left wing, similar with Isophya posthumoidalis and Isophya beybienkoi (Heller et al. 2004[5]). In the other four species, the angle of cubital veins on male wing may be used as a differentiation tool: 80–90° in Isophya ciucasi, 70–80° in Isophya nagyi, 60–70° in Isophya camptoxypha and 70° in Isophya dochia sp. n.The tegmen marginal angle is almost constant in these species (about 120°), but less obtuse in Isophya harzi (110°) (Figs 45–50). In the six species, male cercus morphology has minute variations (Figs 51–56). The ovipositor is relatively similar in length in all species, being longer in Isophya harzi (Figs 57–62) and Isophya beybienkoi (Heller et al. 2004[5]). Female stridulatory area is subject to minor intra– and interspecific variability (Figs 69–74).
Having a look at species distribution in the Romanian Carpathians, Isophya camptoxypha has the widest spread, inhabiting many Carpathian highlands. Isophya harzi is known only from two isolated mountains in the Southern Carpathians and most probably its distribution area is wider in the mountains between Prahova and Olt rivers. At this moment, both Isophya ciucasi and Isophya dochia sp. n. are known to have very restricted distribution areas: the isolated Ciucaş and, respectively, Ceahlău Mountain Massifs. Two species have been recently described from the Transylvanian volcanic mountains, in the Western part of the Eastern Carpathians. Isophya nagyi occurs in Călimani Mountains and Dorna Basin, while Isophya sicula, described from Harghita–Ciceu Mountains, has been recently found in the Moldavian Subcarpathians (Fig. 75). Isophya posthumoidalis was recorded in Romania only in Maramureş Basin (Szövényi and Orci 2008[3]) and Isophya beybienkoi is known only from the area where it was described: Zadiělská planina and Plešivecká planina, Slovenskie Kras, SE Slovakia (Orci et al. 2001[4], Heller et al. 2004[5]). In order to presume the evolutionary pattern within this group of species, some interesting areas must be taken into account, namely the regions where species live syntopically: Isophya camptoxypha and Isophya nagyi have been found together in W Călimani Mountains, Isophya camptoxypha and Isophya sicula in Moldavian Subcarpathians, Isophya camptoxypha and Isophya ciucasi in Central Ciucaş Mountains.
The Orthoptera species of the Carpathians have been well investigated and morphologically characterized. Yet, Isophya, and particularly Isophya camptoxypha and its allies, remain among the most intriguing and widely distributed bush–crickets in these mountains. Due to Isophya camptoxypha’s high intra– and interpopulational morphological variability, the main tool to separate correctly possible new cryptic species remains the oscillographic analysis of acoustic signals.

Table 1. Studied morphological characters (see Material and Methods) O – ovipositor.
HL (mm) HW (mm) PL (mm) PW (mm) TL (mm) TW (mm) BL (mm) FL (mm) CL (mm) O (mm)
male Minimum 1.87 3.19 3.34 3.89 3.8 3.83 21.1 14.57 2.4
Maximum 1.91 3.45 4.02 4.25 4.43 4.29 24.6 16.38 2.6
Mean 1.89 3.32 3.8 4.07 4.23 4.07 22.32 15.2 2.51
S. D. 0.02 0.1 0.24 0.14 0.23 0.16 1.12 0.61 0.08
female Minimum 2.79 3.64 4.02 4.14 1.68 22.67 14.71 1.25 8.32
Maximum 3.07 3.98 4.58 4.66 2.39 26.23 16.56 1.64 8.96
Mean 2.9 3.8 4.31 4.37 1.92 24.44 15.36 1.42 8.61
S. D. 0.11 0.11 0.18 0.21 0.25 1.31 0.66 0.15 0.21
Table 2. Examined male song characters in close related Isophya species (for abbreviations see Appendix 1: Isophya song abbreviations) n – number of analyzed specimens; t – temperature °C.
Song type Species Song characters Min. Max. Mean S. D. n t
Grouped syllable sequences Isophya dochia sp. n. ASD (ms) 30 70 50.74 12.83 30 20–25
NIA 9 29 18.6 6.31
GS (ms) 60 131 96.28 24.62
BSD (ms) 30 59 39.3 9.4
NIB 9 15 12.36 2.1
DACB (ms) 621 1655 1109.1 212.65
NACB 1–4
BSTD (ms) 621 1770 1114.46 325.45
SGTD (ms) 1288 4761 2633.56 792.48
SGD (ms) 612 3028 1406.86 598.95
GSG (ms) 157 326 225.2 52.66
Isophya harzi ASD (ms) 75 168 121.64 28.36 16 19–26
NIA 23 55 40.5 9.67
DACA (ms) 40 90 64 16.97
NACA 0–2
ASTD (ms) 75 258 156.42 77.01
GAA (ms) 122 298 175.78 48.25
GAB (ms) 367 789 527.4 126.18
BSD (ms) 94 216 154.7 43.54
NIB 37 59 46.5 8.38
DACB (ms) 75 202 142.3 47.19
NACB 0–2
BSTD (ms) 94 418 223.3 114.78
SGTD (ms) 617 6168 2254.8 1954.04
SGD (ms) 617 6091 2126 2001.43
GSG (ms) 191 303 249.8 40.28
Ungrouped syllable sequences Isophya camptoxypha SD (ms) 27 90 61.76 21.37 58 19–27
NI 10 32 19.9 7.62
GS (ms) 110 289 189 50.18
DAC (ms) 56 257 112.6 70.71
NAC 0–1 (rarely 2–7)
STD (ms) 27 363 77.8 97.58
Isophya ciucasi SD (ms) 7 24 15.56 5.12 34 24–28
NI 3 26 15.32 6.74
GS (ms) 134 600 378.08 116.95
DAC (ms) 52 167 101.2 38.31
NAC 10–30
STD (ms) 209 438 273.76 56.76
Isophya nagyi SD (ms) 167 793 486.28 200.49 12 21–25
SDC1 (ms) 9 31 21 8.08
NIC1 5 18 12 4.72
GC12 (ms) 68 301 187.6 101.94
SDC2 (ms) 127 221 173.9 31.57
NIC2 35 79 57 13.5
GC23 (ms) 39 97 67.5 19.04
SDC3 (ms) 1 35 16.4 12.33
NIC3 1 11 5.1 3.36
GS (ms) 59 235 154.26 49.59
Isophya sicula SD (ms) 1 4 1.6 1.03 3 25
NI 1 3 1.3 0.65
GS (ms) 190 446 337.78 62.64
DAC (ms) 51 110 73.2 19.71
NAC 0–1 (rarely 2–5)
STD (ms) 52 265 75.1 63.96

Original Description

  • Iorgu, I; 2012: Acoustic analysis reveals a new cryptic bush–cricket in the Carpathian Mountains (Orthoptera, Phaneropteridae) ZooKeys, 254: 1-22. doi

Other References

  1. Orci K, Szövényi G, Nagy B (2010b) Isophya sicula sp. n. (Orthoptera: Tettigonioidea), a new, morphologically cryptic bush–cricket species from the Eastern Carpathians (Romania) recognized from its peculiar male calling song. Zootaxa 2627: 57–68. http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2010/f/zt02627p068.pdf
  2. Szövényi G, Puskás G, Orci K (2012) Isophya nagyi, a new phaneropterid bush–cricket (Orthoptera: Tettigonioidea) from the Eastern Carpathians (Caliman Mountains, North Romania). Zootaxa 3521: 67–79. http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2012/f/zt03521p079.pdf
  3. 3.0 3.1 Szövényi G, Orci K (2008) Contributions to the Orthoptera fauna of Maramureş county with the first record of Isophya posthumoidalis Bazyluk 1971 in Romania. Studia Universitatis “Vasile Goldiş”, Seria Ştiinţele Vieţii 19: 235-241.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Orci K, Szövényi G, Nagy B (2001) Description of the song of Isophya beybienkoi (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidea). Biologia (Bratislava) 56: 489-495.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Heller K, Orci K, Grein G, Ingrisch S (2004) The Isophya species of central and western Europe (Orthoptera: Tettigonioidea, Phaneropteridae). Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 147: 237-258. doi: 10.1163/22119434-900000153
  6. 6.0 6.1 Orci K, Szövényi G, Nagy B (2010a) A characterization of the pair forming acoustic signals of Isophya harzi (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidea, Phaneropteridae). Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 56 (1): 43–53. http://actazool.nhmus.hu/56/1/azh56_1_Orci.pdf

Images