Hagnagora unnia
| Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Sullivan2011ZooKeys149, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Sullivan2011ZooKeys149">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Lepidoptera
Familia: Geometridae
Genus: Hagnagora
Name
Hagnagora unnia Sullivan sp. n. – Wikispecies link – ZooBank link – Pensoft Profile
Type material
Holotype male: Costa Rica, Tapanti National Park, Cartago Province, 1275 m, 12–17 February 2005, J. Bolling Sullivan, DNA voucher no. 06-CRBS-0049 (INBio) Paratypes 13 females: Costa Rica. Same data as holotype (1 female), DNA voucher no. 0305-CRBS-0011; Alajuela Province, Volcan Poas, 2500 m, 7–8 August 2007, J. Bolling Sullivan, (6 females), DNA voucher nos. 07-CRBS-1040, 07-CRBS-1051, 07-CRBS-384, 07-CRBS-385, 07-CRBS-386, 07-CRBS-390; Cartago Province, Villa Mills, 2841 m, J. Bolling Sullivan, (6 females), DNA voucher / GenBank accession nos. 10-CRBS-1845 / JF856991, 10-CRBS-545 / HM879258, 10-CRBS-548 / HM879261, 10-CRBS-550 / HM879263, 10-CRBS-553 / HM879266, 10-CRBS-554 / HM879267. Paratypes deposited in INBio, USNM, JBS.
Etymology
This species is named for Unni E. H. Fyhn, a postdoctoral student in my laboratory in the 1970s and who continued to work on the genetic control of fish hemoglobins until her untimely death from cancer.
Diagnosis
Males are usually smaller but otherwise are indistinguishable from those of Hagnagora elianne. They may be distinguished from Hagnagora anicata by the swollen distal half of the uncus (as opposed to gently tapered) and the absence of a moderately large, upcurved spine at the end of the costa. Females may be distinguished from those of Hagnagora elianne by their shorter, less complex signum. The female of Hagnagora anicata is undescribed.
Specimens from higher altitudes are larger (see Sullivan and Miller 2007[1]) as are most Hagnagora elianne. Specimens from lower altitudes are smaller as are most Hagnagora unnia. Although size alone cannot always be used to distinguish the species, it is often an excellent indicator, particularly where both species occur together. The expanse of the male valves (open and flattened) is often much smaller in Hagnagora unnia; however, this character is not always definitive. In females, the lengths of the ladder-like signa do not overlap for the two species and the sample size was larger than for males (only a single barcoded male of Hagnagora unnia was available). Additionally, the structure of the signum in Hagnagora elianne is broader and more complex.
Description
Male . Head – palps porrect, cream with black scaling on lateral and dorsal sides of segments 2 and 3. Middle segment 2–3 x as long as other segments. Eyes round. Frons scaling slightly raised near base of tongue, brown, square, bordered with cream scales. Head brown with intermingled cream scales, particularly on edges. Collar mostly brown with scattered cream scales. Scape brown laterally and dorsally, ventral cream. Antenna simple, no visible setae, orange tan ventrally with dorsal scaling dark brown, often 70 segments. Thorax and abdomen – thorax brown dorsally; tegulae brown with thin cream scaling at outer edges. Abdomen brown with distal scaling on each segment forming a thin cream ring. Ventral abdomen similar, but with extensive cream scaling on basal segments. Legs with mixture of brown and cream scales, becoming pure cream on proximal segments. Spurs on 2nd and 3rd tibiae small. Epiphysis reaching distal end of tibia. Wings – forewing (16 mm) with cream-white band from middle of costa traversing diagonally almost to anal angle. Distal color almost black. Wing color proximal to diagonal band as dark as outer third, then becoming brown to base. Wing margins with thin cream crescents. Hindwing uniformly brown with terminal cream crescents at very tips. Leading edge of costa with two yellow spots evenly spaced between base and white band. Cream band on underside of forewing similar to that upperside. Outer third of wing rust colored becoming blackish in tornal half near wing band. Wing surface basal to white band black, crossed by thin white lines. Retinaculum thumb-like, distinct, rusty. Hindwing rusty, crossed by thin cream-white lines. Medial area of wing (corresponding to white band on forewing) lighter, distinct. Veins distinct, orange scaled. Anal edge of forewing with white scaling. Female. No differences from male except antennal segments thinner, retinaculum absent, and white scaling at ventral base of scape extends onto antennal shaft. Forewing length 19.33 mm (16–21mm, N=12). Male genitalia – terminal half of moderately long uncus distinctly swollen; tip slightly pointed but not hooked. Tegumen broad, sclerotized on lateral and proximal edges that fuse below base of uncus, often forming a distinct X-shaped structure. Vinculum moderately broad, rather uneven along its edges. Vinculum fused to tegument via its proximal sclerotized edge; distal edge ends in a circular flap. Anellar arms project finger-like to medial area but do not fuse. Juxta a large circular structure. Saccus with broad, almost diamond-shaped structure, but it often is folded behind valves during slide preparation. Valva moderately broad and curves upward toward apex. Costa sclerotized but edge is not well defined; ends in a small slightly upcurved spine. Valva with pronounced, swollen, medial ridge; sacular area lightly sclerotized. Medial area of valva largely unsclerotized, but with large hair brush anchored at base. Additional hairs are on medial ridge and saccular region. Aedeagus sclerotized to manica with out third unsclerotized, but with striations. Ductus emerges subbasally. Aedeagus without sclerotized ridges or projections. Vesica expanded basally into two dorsal striated “wings.” Ventral vesica slightly striated. Vesica narrowed toward terminus with dorsal surface crinkled and striated, but separated from striations of dorsal “wings.” Female genitalia – anal papillae slightly pointed and striated toward distal tips. Posterior apophyses 1½ × length of anterior apophyses; apophyses end proximally in a terminally rounded, paddle-like structure. Segment surfaces unsclerotized, but with tightly adhering scales. Ostial area poorly defined and unsclerotized. Ostial opening expanded laterally, tapered to ductus, which is moderately long and thin with a proximal collar at base. Bursa an expanded sac, stippled dorsally and with two, ventral ladder-like signa. Signa look like corrugated pipes, tapering anteriorly. Length of longest sclerotized signum is best character for distinguishing Hagnagora elianne from Hagnagora unnia. No distinct structures on pelt. Tympanum with ansa swollen distally for half its length then narrowed before expanding at proximal end to form a T-like structure with a swollen base.
Discussion
The Hagnagora anicata complex in Costa Rica illustrates a frequently occurring example in barcode work with neotropical Lepidoptera. Species with large geographical distributions are frequently a complex of species, often seemingly identical in maculation. When genitalic examination is applied to distinct barcode clusters, they usually resolve these genetic clusters, reinforcing the concept of distinct species. Additionally, other characteristics such as elevational or geographical distributions, food plant usage, and behavior, often also support the distinctness of these clusters. In the case of the Hagnagora anicata complex in Costa Rica, initial barcoding revealed one species above 3000 m and another below 2200 m, the species differing in more than 5% of their sequences and with little intraspecific sequence variability. When additional sampling was done at intermediate altitudes the results still supported two species. Although additional sampling needs to be done, Hagnagora elianne continues to occur at higher altitudes and Hagnagora unnia occurs at lower altitudes with the two species overlapping between 1400 and 3000 m. Based on genital characters, both species are distinct from each other and from Hagnagora anicata, which may not extend north of Colombia. Material from western Colombia (Valle province) differs in genital characters from Hagnagora anicata (Sullivan, unpubl. data) and barcoded samples from Ecuador (Brehm, unpubl. data) reveal at least two species there, both genetically distinct from the Costa Rican species. Barcoding of hundreds of species of the montane geometrid fauna from Ecuador and Costa Rica demonstrates that very few species are actually common to both regions (Brehm and Sullivan, unpubl. data).
We know little about the biology of either new species, although, based on observations at 3300 m, presumed Hagnagora elianne do fly diurnally, which may be true of all Hagnagora species (Brehm and Sullivan 2005[2]). Known food plants used by Hagnagora are in the Boraginaceae (e.g., Cordia L.) and the Clethraceae (e.g., Clethra L.) (Brehm 2002[3]) and the Hagnagora anicata complex likely uses the same groups of plants. Recently, King and Parra (2011)[4] reported captive larvae of Hagnagora vittata (Philippi) that were reared on Fuschia magellanica Lamarck (Onagraceae).
The Hagnagora anicata complex extends from Mexico to Bolivia and east into western Venezuela paralleling the Andes. A population occurs on Jamaica. While traditionally considered a single species, barcode and genitalic analyses indicate that five or more species are probably involved in the complex. It is not unreasonable to assume that because such complexes are common in the neotropics, the estimated number of geometrid species described from there will likely continue to increase, perhaps dramatically.
Original Description
- Sullivan, J; 2011: Two new species of the Hagnagora anicata complex (Geometridae, Larentiinae) from Costa Rica ZooKeys, 149: 17-29. doi
Other References
- ↑ Sullivan J, Miller W (2007) Intraspecific body size variation in macrolepidoptera as related to altitude of capture site and seasonal generation. Journal Lepidopterists’ Society 61: 72-77.
- ↑ Brehm G, Sullivan B (2005) Unusual flight activity of a new species of Hagnagora Druce, 1885 (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) from Costa Rica. Ent. Zeitschrift 115: 256-260.
- ↑ Brehm G (2002) Diversity of geometrid moths in a montane rainforest in Ecuador. Dissertation, Universitat Bayreuth. http://opus.ub.unibayreuth.de/voltexte/2003/20
- ↑ King G, Parra L (2011) Contribution to an understanding of the biology and the morphology of the early stages of a Neotropical larentine: Hagnagora vittata Phillipi,1859 in Chile (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 54B(1–2): 5–15.
Images
|
