Eriauchenius harveyi\according to Wood et al 2017
| Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Wood2017ZooKeys, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Wood2017ZooKeys">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Araneae
Familia: Archaeidae
Genus: Eriauchenius
Name
Eriauchenius harveyi Wood & Scharff, 2017 sp. n. – Wikispecies link – ZooBank link – Pensoft Profile
Type material
Male holotype: Madagascar, Fianarantsoa, Massif Andringitra, 43 km S Ambalavo, 22°14'S, 47°00'E, 825 m, 4 Oct 1993, rainforest, sifted litter B.L. Fisher (deposited in CAS; CASENT9012110)
Other material examined
MADAGASCAR: Female paratype, same data as holotype, (CASENT9012342); 1M, Fianarantsoa, 9.0 km NE Ivohibe, 22°25.6'S, 46°56.3'E, 900 m, 12–17 Nov 1997, forest, leaf litter, B.L. Fisher (CASENT9012109)
Etymology
The specific name is a patronym to honor Dr. Mark Harvey for his work on the Australian archaeids.
Diagnosis
Males are distinguished from other “bourgini group” species except E. fisheri, E. goodmani sp. n. and E. wunderlichi sp. n. by having the pedipalpal tegulum of the “workmani group” form, with the apical conductor encircling a pit-like cavity (Fig. 11D–K). Males are distinguished from E. fisheri by having a comparably straighter embolus, with only a broad curve (Fig. 11E, H, J–K), rather than s-shaped, from E. goodmani sp. n. by lacking the elongated conductor that is broad and blunt at the tip (Fig. 10F), rather than tapering off to a fine point (Fig. 11F, I), and from E. wunderlichi sp. n. by lacking an elongation in the apical portion of the tegulum where the conductor swirls around making the bulb almost twice as long as it is wide (Fig. 12F). Females are distinguished from the “bourgini group” except for E. goodmani sp. n. and E. wunderlichi sp. n. by having two large groups of poreplates on a sclerotized plate that covers the ventral side of the bursa (Fig. 11C), whereas in other “bourgini group” species the poreplates are in smaller clusters on the anterior side of the bursa. Females are distinguished from E. goodmani sp. n. by having a thinner posterior bar (Fig. 11B), and from E. wunderlichi sp. n. by lacking the large bulge in the center of the posterior bar (Fig. 12B). Females are indistinguishable from E. fisheri.
Description
Male holotype (CASENT9012110, from Massif Andringitra, Madagascar). Total length 2.05, carapace 0.87 long, 0.75 wide. Abdomen 1.08 long, 1.15 high. Carapace tilt angle 76.1°, tilt height (CtH) 1.29, constriction 0.55, head length 0.73, neck length 0.61. CtH divided by carapace length 1.48. Cephalon with AME virtually flush with surrounding cuticle, and with 2 short modified spines at the apex (Fig. 11A). Chelicerae 1.30 long, and with a long spine 0.15 from base of chelicerae and projecting perpendicular to the cheliceral cuticle (Fig. 11L, arrow). Femur I 1.36 long. Sternum 0.56 long, 0.37 wide. Carapace, chelicerae, sternum and legs reddish brown with white setae, but reduced numbers compared to other Eriauchenius. All patella lighter in color, being more yellowish white. Abdomen mottled brown and beige, with tufts of white setae, although reduced in number compared to other Eriauchenius (Fig. 11A). Pedipalpal (Fig. 11D–K) tegulum of the “workmani group” form (Fig. 11D–E), with apical conductor encircling a pit-like cavity. Conductor tip tapering off into a sharp point (Fig. 11I). MA broad, thick and triangular (Fig. 11H, K), and sclerite SC heavily sclerotized and thicker than the transluscent thin structure seen in the “workmani group”. Embolus dark, broadly curved, and wire-like (Fig. 11G–K).
Female paratype (CASENT9012342). Total length 2.31, carapace 0.97 long, 0.86 wide. Abdomen 1.23 long, 1.24 high. Carapace tilt angle 76.3°, tilt height (CtH) 1.45, constriction 0.65, head length 0.82, neck length 0.70. CtH divided by carapace length 1.49. Cephalon as in male. Chelicerae 1.44 long, and with long spine 0.17 from base of chelicerae and projecting perpendicular. Femur I 1.50 long. Sternum 0.63 long, 0.42 wide. Colours as in male. Genitalia with a noncomplex sclerotized plate, with posterior bar, and with “wings” reduced, with poreplates in two large groups, divided down the middle of the bursa and on a sclerotized plate that covers the ventral side of the bursa (Fig. 11B–C).
Variation
Total length 2.05–2.12 (males; n=2); Carapace length 0.87–0.92 (males; n=2); Femur I 1.57–1.64 times the length of carapace in males (n=2). CtH divided by carapace length 1.47–1.48 in males (n=2). Average femur I length 1.43 (males; n=2).
Natural history
Specimens were collected in rainforest in the leaf litter from 825–900 m in elevation.
Distribution
Known only from around Andringitra Massif in southeast Madagascar (Fig. 32).
Original Description
- Wood, H; Scharff, N; 2017: A review of the Madagascan pelican spiders of the genera Eriauchenius O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1881 and Madagascarchaea gen. n. (Araneae, Archaeidae) ZooKeys, (727): 1-96. doi
Images
|
