Engraulicypris
Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Riddin2016ZooKeys, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Riddin2016ZooKeys">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Cypriniformes
Familia: Cyprinidae
Name
Engraulicypris Günther, 1894 – Wikispecies link – Pensoft Profile
- Engraulicypris Günther, 1894: 626 (type species: Engraulicypris pinguis Günther, 1894 (= Barilius sardella Günther, 1868: Lévêque and Daget 1984[1], Eschmeyer et al. 2016[2]))
- [[= Mesobola|= Mesobola]] Howes, 1984: 168 syn. n. (type species: Neobola brevianalis Boulenger, 1908)
Diagnosis
With the synonymisation of Mesobola and Engraulicypris, Günther’s (1894)[3] diagnosis of Engraulicypris must be modified to include the species assigned to Mesobola. Engraulicypris is a genus of moderately small African chedrin barbs (sensu Tang et al. 2010[4]; Liao et al. 2011[5], 2012[6]) identified by a lack of a scaly lobe at the base of the pelvic or pectoral fin; a large mouth reaching the anterior border of the orbit or beyond; a dorsal fin origin originating behind midpoint of standard length, more or less above the origin of the anal fin; a pectoral fin not reaching the origin of the anal fin; and body colouration lacking vertical bars or bands. Osteological characters are discussed by Liao et al. (2011[5], 2012[6]) for Mesobola and by Liao et al. (2012)[6] for Engraulicypris.
Live colouration
(Fig. 6). Body without vertical bars or bands.
Etymology
Engraulicypris alludes to the anchovy-like form (eggraulis, -eos [eggraulis, -eos]; Greek) of these relatives of the carp (kyprinos [kyprinos]; Greek).
Distribution
Southern and Eastern Africa.
Taxon Treatment
- Riddin, M; Bills, I; Villet, M; 2016: Phylogeographic, morphometric and taxonomic re-evaluation of the river sardine, Mesobola brevianalis (Boulenger, 1908) (Teleostei, Cyprinidae, Chedrini) ZooKeys, (641): 121-150. doi
Images
|
Other References
- ↑ Lévêque C, Daget J (1984) Cyprinidae. In: Daget J Gosse J Thys v (Eds) Check-list of the freshwater fishes of Africa. CLOFFA. ORSTOM Paris, MARC Tervuren. vol. 1, 217–342.
- ↑ Eschmeyer W, Fricke R, van der Laan R (Eds) (2016) Catalog of Fishes: Genera, Species, References. http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp [Electronic version accessed 15 August 2016]
- ↑ Günther A (1894) Second report on the reptiles, batrachians, and fishes transmitted by Mr. H. H. Johnston, C.B., from British Central Africa. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 4: 616–628. http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/69569
- ↑ Tang K, Agnew M, Hirt M, Sado T, Schneider L, Freyhof J, Sulaiman Z, Swartz E, Vidthayanon C, Miya M, Saitoh K, Simons A, Wood R, Mayden R (2010) Systematics of the subfamily Danioninae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 57: 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2010.05.021
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Liao T, Kullander S, Fang F (2011) Phylogenetic position of rasborin cyprinids and monophyly of major lineages among the Danioninae, based on morphological characters (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 49: 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.2011.00621.x
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Liao T, Arroyave J, Stiassny M (2012) Diagnosis of Asian Raiamas (Teleostei: Cyprinidae: Chedrina) with comments on chedrin relationships and previously proposed diagnostic characters for Opsaridium and Raiamas. Ichthyological Research 59: 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-012-0296-9