Cleobulia coccinea
| Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Queiroz2020PhytoKeys164, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Queiroz2020PhytoKeys164">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Fabales
Familia: Fabaceae
Genus: Cleobulia
Name
Cleobulia coccinea (Vell.) L.P. Queiroz comb. nov. – Wikispecies link – Pensoft Profile
- [[ | ]] Basionym: Dolichos coccineus Vell., Fl. Flumin.: 321, 1829 [1825]. Ic. 7 pl. 158. 1831. Type: Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, “Habitat silvis, fruticetisque maritimis”, Vellozo (lectotype, designated here: plate 158 in Florae Fluminensis vol. 7, Vellozo 1831[1]).Epitype: Brazil, Bahia, Lençóis, L.P. Queiroz et al. 16029 (epitype, designated here: HUEFS! [200008453]; isoepitypes: ALCB! [046364!], RB! [1173635!], US! [3698469]).
- Cleobulia multiflora Mart. ex Benth., Comm. Legum. Gen.: 67. 1837. Type: Brazil, Minas Gerais, Martius s.n. (lectotype, designated here: M! [0240673]), syn. nov.
Note
A link between Dolichos coccineus Vell. and Cleobulia multiflora Mart. ex Benth. was established by Maxwell (1977)[2], who speculated that they could be synonymous. The description provided by Vellozo (1829: 321) is exceedingly brief, but presents some traits characteristic of this species, such as flowers small and perianth purpureum. The illustration provides more elements to confirm its identity as C. multiflora as it shows resupinate flowers with the standard spreading, the wing petals sagittate and much shorter than the others and the pistil with a straight ovary and style upcurved ca. 90°. There are issues regarding the publication dates of several sections of the Florae Fluminensis but the main text in volume 1 (pages 1 to 329) is considered as having been distributed between 7 September to 28 November 1829 and the illustration volumes on 29 October 1831 (Carauta 1969[3], 1972[4]; Stafleu and Cowan 1985[5]; Lima 1995[6]), thus predating and having priority over Cleobulia multiflora published by Bentham in 1837. To avoid misinterpretation of the name proposed by Vellozo (1831)[1]), we are designating an epitype with leaf, flowers and fruits.
Taxon Treatment
- Queiroz, L; Snak, C; 2020: Revisiting the taxonomy of Dioclea and related genera (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae), with new generic circumscriptions PhytoKeys, 164: 67-114. doi
Other References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Vellozo JM da C (1831 [1827]) Florae fluminensis Icones, vol. 7. Litogr. Senefelder, Paris.
- ↑ Maxwell R (1977) A resumé of the genus Cleobulia (Leguminosae) and its relation to the genus Dioclea. Phytologia 38: 51–65. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.23376
- ↑ Carauta J (1969) A data efetiva da publicação da "Flora Fluminensis".Vellozia7: 26–33.
- ↑ Carauta J (1972) A data efetiva da publicação da Flora Fluminensis. 11. O texto impresso em 1825. In: Anais do XXII Congresso Nacional de Botânica, Garanhuns, Brasil, 141–147.
- ↑ Stafleu F, Cowan R (1985) Taxonomic Literature: A selective guide to botanical publications and collections with dates, commentaries and types. V - Sal-Ste. Regnum Vegetabile: 112. [Scheltema and Holkema, Bohn.]
- ↑ Lima H (1995) Leguminosas da Flora Fluminensis - J.M. da C. Vellozo - lista atualizada das espécies arbóreas.Acta Botanica Brasílica9(1): 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33061995000100006
