Apomastinae
Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Bond2012ZooKeys252, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Bond2012ZooKeys252">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Araneae
Familia: Euctenizidae
Name
Apomastinae Bond & Hedin subfam. n. – Wikispecies link – ZooBank link – Pensoft Profile
Type genus
Apomastus Bond & Opell, 2002
Note
Defined as a euctenizid subfamily comprising the genera Myrmekiaphila, Apomastus, and Aptostichus in Bond et al. (2012b)[1], the new designation, despite considerable phylogenetic support was dismissed as a nomen nudum in an online catalog (Platnick 2012) due to the absence of a formal diagnosis. To correct this oversight, I formally diagnose below the newsubfamily Apomastinae and again provide a list of included genera. As was originally intended, authorship is to be attributed to Bond and Hedin.
Diagnosis
Apomastinae, a lineage defined in extensive phylogenetic analyses that include multiple lines of evidence that comprises genes and morphology (Bond and Hedin 2006[2]; Bond et al. 2012b[1]) can be morphologically distinguished from all other euctenizids by having a patch of endite cuspules that is restricted to the proximal inner margin (Fig. 38; rather than being uniformly distributed across the endite face, see Stockman and Bond 2008, fig. 10) and by having two distinct posterior median spinneret spigot types (as opposed to a single type, Stockman and Bond 2008[3], fig. 24).
Included genera
Myrmekiaphila Atkinson, 1886
Aptostichus Simon, 1891
Apomastus Bond and Opell, 2002
Taxon Treatment
- Bond, J; 2012: Phylogenetic treatment and taxonomic revision of the trapdoor spider genus Aptostichus Simon (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Euctenizidae) ZooKeys, 252: 1-209. doi
Other References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Bond J, Hendrixson B, Hamilton C, Hedin M (2012b) A Reconsideration of the Classification of the Spider Infraorder Mygalomorphae (Arachnida: Araneae) Based on Three Nuclear Genes and Morphology. PLoS ONE 7(6): e38753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038753
- ↑ Bond J, Hedin M (2006) A total evidence assessment of the phylogeny of the diverse North American trapdoor spider subfamily Euctenizinae (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Cyrtaucheniidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41: 70-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.04.026
- ↑ Stockman A, Bond J (2008) A taxonomic review of the trapdoor spider genus Promyrmekiaphila Schenkel (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Cyrtaucheniidae, Euctenizinae). Zootaxa: 25–41.
Images
|