Anagrus dmitrievi
| Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Li2018ZooKeys, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Li2018ZooKeys">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Hymenoptera
Familia: Mymaridae
Genus: Anagrus
Name
Anagrus dmitrievi Triapitsyn & Hu sp. n. – Wikispecies link – ZooBank link – Pensoft Profile
- Anagrus sp(p).: Yi et al. 2013[1]: 331 (correlation with the host leafhopper in Xinjiang).
- Anagrus breviphragma Soyka: Yi et al. 2013[1]: 332 (misidentification).
Type material
Holotype female on slide (Fig. 1A), deposited in ICXU, labeled: 1. “CHINA: Xinjiang, Urumqi, Anningqu, 23.vi.2013, J. Lu (Lu Jiaxiong), from leafhopper egg on corn leaf”; 2. “Dry length 0.495 mm”; 3. “Mounted by V. V. Berezovskiy 2014 in Canada balsam”; 4. [red] “Anagrus (Anagrus) dmitrievi Triapitsyn & Hu HOLOTYPE ♀”; 5. “Det. by S. V. Triapitsyn 2014”. Paratypes: 2 females and 2 males on points [UCRC], and 11 females and 8 males on slides [CNC (1 and 1), ICXU (6 and 4), UCRC (4 and 3), respectively], same data as the holotype (43.9507°N, 87.4713°E, 586 m) except for different body length measurements.
Non-type material examined
Numerous specimens of both sexes in ethanol, deposited in ICXU, reared by L. Yi (Yi Long) from eggs of Z. eremita during 2012 (Yi et al. 2013[1]).
Diagnosis
Anagrus dmitrievi, sp. n. is characterized by the following unique combination of features: antenna (Fig. 1B) with F1 slightly more than half of pedicel length, F2 longest of funicular segments, F3–F6 subequal in length and slightly shorter than F2, F4 usually without mps but sometimes with one mps (occasionally only on one antenna), F5 with one or two mps, F6 with two mps, and clava with five mps; midlobe of mesoscutum with a pair of adnotaular setae (Fig. 1D); fore wing (Fig. 2B) 9.0–9.1 × as long as wide and its disc with several rows of setae leaving no distinct bare areas in its broadest part; ovipositor exserted beyond apex of gaster by 0.06–0.15 × total own length and 2.1–2.4 × length of protibia, each second valvifer with three distal setae (Fig. 2A).
Description
Female (holotype and paratypes). Body length of dry-mounted, critical point-dried paratypes 400–627 µm (495 µm of the holotype; measurements taken prior to slide-mounting). Head light brown to brown except eyes and ocelli reddish; body mostly yellowish or light brown except anterior half or so of mesoscutum brown, frenum of scutellum white, and propodeum lemon yellow; scape, pedicel and F1 yellow, rest of flagellum brown; legs yellowish, wings hyaline. Antenna (Fig. 1B) with scape 3.5–3.6 × as long as wide, with cross-ridges, 1.7–1.8 × length of pedicel; F1 cylindrical, slightly more than half of pedicel length; F2 longest of funicular segments; F3–F6 subequal in length and slightly shorter than F2; mps on F4 (usually none but sometimes one, occasionally only on one antenna as in the holotype, Fig. 1B); F5 (one or two), and F6 (two); clava with five mps, 3.0–3.3 × as long as wide, about as long as combined length of two preceding segments. Mesosoma shorter than metasoma (Fig. 1C). Midlobe of mesoscutum with a pair of adnotaular setae (Fig. 1D). Fore wing (Fig. 2B) 9.0–9.1 × as long as wide, longest marginal seta 2.8–3.0 × maximum wing width; distal macrochaeta 2.0–2.7 × length of proximal macrochaeta; disc with several rows of setae (two such rows just beyond apex of venation, the row of setae along posterior margin originating behind apex of venation), leaving no distinct bare areas in its broadest part. Hind wing (Fig. 2B) 24–27 × as long as wide, longest marginal seta 6.0–6.5 × maximum wing width; disc mostly bare except for admarginal rows of setae. Ovipositor anteriorly not extending to mesophragma in slide-mounted specimens and posteriorly exserted beyond apex of gaster by 0.06–0.15 × total ovipositor length. Second valvifers (= external plates of ovipositor of authors) (Chiappini 1989[2]; Chiappini et al. 1996[3]; etc.) each with three distal setae (Fig. 2A). Ovipositor 2.1–2.4 × length of protibia (2.3 × in the holotype).
Measurements (µm) of the holotype. Body 627; head 123; mesosoma 209; gaster 307; ovipositor 277. Antenna: scape 73; pedicel 42; F1 24; F2 49; F3 45; F4 45 (48 of the other on which an mps is present); F5 45; F6 48; clava 103. Fore wing 547:61; longest marginal seta 172. Hind wing 517:21; longest marginal seta 136.
Male (paratypes). Body length of the dry-mounted, critical point-dried paratypes (including prior to slide-mounting) 462–594 µm. Similar to female except for the normal sexually dimorphic features such as antenna (Fig. 3A) and genitalia (Fig. 3C), and the following. Body somewhat darker than in female, particularly gaster light brown to brown; fore wing (Fig. 3B) 7.3–8.2 × as long as wide.
Remarks
The new species belongs to the incarnatus species group of the nominate subgenus of Anagrus, as defined by Chiappini et al. (1996)[3], in whose key it runs to A. flaveolus Waterhouse (see below). In Chiappini and Lin (1998)[4], A. dmitrievi keys in the same couplet together with A. striatus Chiappini & Lin, a completely different species whose female has one mps on F3 and a bare area on the broadest part of the fore wing disc. In Triapitsyn and Berezovskiy (2004)[5], A. dmitrievi keys to A. nigriceps (Smits van Burgst) in which an mps is present on F3 of the female antenna (Chiappini et al. 1996[3]) whereas it is always absent on that segment in A. dmitrievi.
When, as usually, F4 of the female antenna of A. dmitrievi lacks an mps, it is most similar to the Nearctic species A. sophiae S. Trjapitzin, which, however, has a relatively much longer ovipositor (2.7–3.8 × length of protibia) (Trjapitzin and Strong 1995[6]). When F4 of the female antenna bears an mps (at least on one antenna), it is most similar to the New World species A. flaveolus, from which it differs in F5 being about as long as F4 and F6 and also in having the row of setae along the posterior margin and originating behind the apex of venation of the fore wing (whereas in A. flaveolus, F5 is always shorter than F4 and F6, even when an mps is present, and the row of setae along the posterior margin of the fore wing does not extend to apex of venation). Those females of A. dmitrievi that bear an mps on F4 on both antennae are also somewhat similar to females of the Palaearctic species A. brocheri Schulz, whose general body color is much darker (dark brown).
In the world key to the species of Anagrus by Triapitsyn (2015)[7], females of A. dmitrievi key either to A. sophiae (when an mps is present on F4) or A. flaveolus (when an mps is absent on F4).
The updated key to the Chinese species of Anagrus (below) was modified from Triapitsyn (2015)[7]. The previous key (Chiappini & Lin 1998) is missing the five species, besides A. dmitrievi, described or recorded since then (A. (Anagrus) fragranticus Triapitsyn, A. (Anagrus) incarnatus Haliday [as A. (Anagrus) breviphragma Soyka], A. (Anagrus) kvas Triapitsyn & Berezovskiy, A. (Anagrus) nigriceps (Smits van Burgst), and A. (Anagrus) turpanicus Triapitsyn & Hu) (Triapitsyn 2003[8], 2015[7]; Triapitsyn and Berezovskiy 2004[5]; Hu and Triapitsyn 2016[9]). Thus, 21 named species of Anagrus are now known from China.
Etymology
The species is named after Dmitry A. Dmitriev (INHS) who kindly identified the leafhopper host of this parasitoid.
Host
The parasitoids of the type series were definitely reared from eggs of Zyginidia eremita because we also reared this leafhopper from its unparasitized eggs during the same collecting event; these leafhoppers were later compared with the positively identified specimens.
Biology and parasitism
Leafhopper’s eggs parasitized by A. dmitrievi turn dark reddish (Fig. 4A). The optimal constant incubation temperature under laboratory conditions for immature A. dmitrievi was 25 °C, at which about 38 % of the eggs hatched. Estimated field parasitism rate of Z. eremita eggs by A. dmitrievi in Xinjiang was 12–75 % (average about 38 %), thus making it a rather effective natural enemy.
Key to females of the Chinese species of AnagrusNotes on the leafhopper host of Anagrus dmitrievi Identification of the host leafhopper
The corn three-spotted leafhopper, collected on 7.viii.2012 by J. Lu (Lu Jiaxiong) and L. Yi (Yi Long) on maize plants at the same locality as the type series of A. dmitrievi, were identified by Dmitry A. Dmitriev as Zyginidia (Zyginidia) eremita (voucher specimens in INHS and additional 2 females in UCRC). This was the most abundant leafhopper species feeding on maize plants in Anningqu. Another rather common leafhopper on maize in Xinjiang was Cicadella viridis (Linnaeus) (Yi et al. 2013[1]).
Adult Z. eremita (Fig. 5H–J) have a characteristic grayish white color; light brown markings decorate the costal margin of vertex. The pronotum is transparent, and three equal-sized oval black spots are present on the adults’ mesoscutum. The fore and hind wings are crystal white, and the abdomen has black, transverse, dorsal bands. The average length of adult Z. eremita is 2.6–2.8 mm. Records, phenology, and life cycle of Z. eremita
Zyginidia eremita has quite frequent records in Xinjiang (Fig. 6). It occurred in almost every maize field sampled. Only 5–10 % of the maize fields had a relatively sparse population of Z. eremita. The highest population densities observed were in Jimsar, Qitai, Mulei, Changji, and Urumqi. In Xinjiang (eastern Xinjiang: Jimsar, Qitai, Mulei, Balikun, and Hami; north-central Xinjiang: Ili, Turpan, Korla, and Urumqi (Anningqu)), Z. eremita has three generations per year and these overlap during the warm months. According to Yu et al. (1995)[10], adult leafhoppers of this species overwinter in winter wheat or in poaceous weeds. But according to Yu et al. (2001)[11], adults also overwinter in surrounding trees, although no details exactly where they hide were provided by these authors.
Adult leafhoppers start to emerge from their overwintering shelters in late April; in about mid-May, at least some of them apparently move to winter and spring wheat (Yu et al. 1995[10]). The first generation of nymphs appears on wheat plants in late May. In early June, the first generation of adult leafhoppers migrates to maize fields and feeds on the seedlings. Their peak oviposition period occurs in late June.
The leafhopper species collected by J. Lu on 13.vi.2014 in the wheat field in Anningqu was, however, not Z. eremita but Macrosteles (Macrosteles) alpinus (Zetterstedt) [2 females and 2 males in UCRC, determined by D. A. Dmitriev].
Females of Z. eremita prefer relatively mature leaves of maize plants for oviposition. Most eggs are laid in the leaves near the ground, very rarely in the upper leaves on a plant. Transparent oval eggs of the corn three-spotted leafhopper are usually laid into the leaf tissue near the bottom of a leaf close to the middle vein.
In early July, the second generation of nymphs hatches, and within about ten days their population density becomes very high. The second generation of adults oviposits in maize leaves in late July and early August. Peak abundance of the third generation nymphs is in mid to late August. Adult leafhoppers of the third generation gradually move in the fall to winter wheat (Yu et al. 1995[10]) or grass (Yu et al. 2001[11]).
Life history and phenology of Z. eremita are summarized in Table 1, and its life cycle is shown in Fig. 5.
| Month | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November to March |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period | Early Mid Late | Early Mid Late | Early Mid Late | Early Mid Late | Early Mid Late | Early Mid Late | Early Mid Late | Early Mid Late |
| 1st genera-tion | ★ ● ● | ● ● ● | ||||||
| ▲ ▲ | ▲ ▲ | |||||||
| ★ | ★ ★ ★ | ★ | ||||||
| 2nd genera-tion | ● ● | ● ● ● | ||||||
| ▲ ▲ ▲ | ▲ ▲ | |||||||
| ★ | ★ ★ ★ | ★ | ||||||
| 3rd genera-tion | ● ● ● | ● ● | ||||||
| ▲ ▲ | ▲ ▲ ▲ | |||||||
| ★ | ★ ★ ★ | ★ ★ ★ | ★ ★ ★ |
Original Description
- Li, Q; Hu, H; Triapitsyn, S; Yi, L; Lu, J; 2018: Anagrus dmitrievi sp. n. (Hymenoptera, Mymaridae), an egg parasitoid of Zyginidia eremita (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae), a pest of maize in Xinjiang, China ZooKeys, (736): 43-57. doi
Images
|
Other References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Yi L, Aishan Z, Li Q, Wang C, Hu H (2013) Resource investigation of leafhoppers and their egg parasitoids in maize field in eastern Xinjiang. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences (Xinjiang Nongye Kexue) 50(2): 325–333. [In Chinese]
- ↑ Chiappini E (1989) Review of the European species of the genus Anagrus Haliday (Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea). Bollettino di Zoologia agraria e di Bachicoltura Serie II 21: 85–119.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Chiappini E, Triapitsyn S, Donev A (1996) Key to the Holarctic species of Anagrus Haliday (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) with a review of the Nearctic and Palaearctic (other than European) species and descriptions of new taxa. Journal of Natural History 30(4): 551–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222939600770301
- ↑ Chiappini E, Lin N (1998) Anagrus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) of China, with descriptions of nine new species. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 91(5): 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/91.5.549
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Triapitsyn S, Berezovskiy V (2004) Review of the genus Anagrus Haliday, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in Russia, with notes on some extralimital species. Far Eastern Entomologist 139: 1–36.
- ↑ Trjapitzin S, Strong D (1995) A new Anagrus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), an egg parasitoid of Prokelisia spp. (Homoptera: Delphacidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 71(4): 199–203.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Triapitsyn S (2015) Taxonomy of the genus Anagrus Haliday (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) of the world: an annotated key to the described species, discussion of the remaining problems, and a checklist. Acta Zoológica Lilloana 59(1/2): 3–50.
- ↑ Triapitsyn S (2003) Description of a new species of Anagrus from China related to A. takeyanus (Hymenoptera Mymaridae). Belgian Journal of Entomology 5(1/2): 117–124.
- ↑ Hu H, Triapitsyn S (2016) Anagrus turpanicus sp. n. (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) from China, an egg parasitoid of Arboridia kakogowana (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Zootaxa 4161(4): 573–578. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4161.4.9
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 Yu J, Chen Y, Qu L, Chai Y, Ren L (1995) Study on the occurrence and control of corn three-spotted leafhopper. Journal of August 1st Agricultural College 18(1): 48–51. [In Chinese]
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Yu J, Li G, Ma D, Qu L, Zhao Z (2001) The law of growth and decrease as well as prevention measures of Zygina salina Mit. Journal of Maize Sciences 9(3): 79–81. [In Chinese]
