Albertosaurus megagracilis
| Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Paul1988, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Paul1988">{{Citation |
Ordo: Saurischia
Familia: Tyrannosauridae
Genus: Albertosaurus
Name
Albertosaurus megagracilis Paul, G. S., 1988 – Wikispecies link – Pensoft Profile
- Albertosaurus megagracilis Paul, G. S., 1988: 333-336.
Materials Examined
United States
Description
time —latest Maastrichtian of the latest Late Cretaceous
Distribution
horizon and distribution —Hell Creek Formation of Montana
Description
Type SKULL LENGTH— ~ ~900 900 mm TOTAL LENGTH—— —7.5 m m TONNAGE——~ ~1.7 1.7 In describing the one partial skeleton, Ralph Molnar tentatively assigned it to the contemporary A. lancensis. While looking over the remains I became convinced that they are much too big and too immature—the poorly ossified elements and moderate sized transverse crest atop the braincase suggest it was not fully grown—to belong in the much smaller species. This animal is clearly not Tyrannosaurus either. The next question is whether it is A. libratus or A. arctunguis. The LACM animal’s extremely atrophied forelimbs, down-bent nasals, very long snout, and long hind limbs strongly indicate that it is not. A new species is therefore named, one that describes its combination of large size and gracile build. In fact, this species probably got as big as A. libratus. Not enough is known to allow a skeletal restoration. ——
Discussion
A. megagracilis is similar to and may be a direct descendant of the earlier A. arctunguis, which in turn may be a direct descendant of the yet earlier A. libratus. So these three species may represent a lineage in which size and basic design remained remarkably consistent, but the legs became increasingly long, the arms ever smaller, the snout longer, and the form overall more gracile. Not only are the hand claws small, but their very small tubers for muscle insertion show that the arm was very weak. A. megagracilis is more advanced than even Tyrannosaurus rex in
forelimb reduction, and this indicates that given a little more time albertosaurs would have abandoned them altogether. Time it did not have, for the rarity ofA. megagracilis relative to T. rex suggests that, like many other latest Cretaceous dinosaurs, it was in trouble. If so, then the big albertosaur lineage may have been doomed even if the great extinction had not taken place. This lineage’s decline seems to have been due to the lessening numbers of their preferred prey, duckbills, in Maastrichtian time, not because the genus was intrinsically inferior to Tyrannosaurus. Aside from T. rex, the competitor of A. megagracilis was the small and equally rare A. lancensis.
Discussion
A. megagracilis is similar to and may be a direct descendant of the earlier A. arctunguis, which in turn may be a direct descendant of the yet earlier A. libratus. So these three species may represent a lineage in which size and basic design remained remarkably consistent, but the legs became increasingly long, the arms ever smaller, the snout longer, and the form overall more gracile. Not only are the hand claws small, but their very small tubers for muscle insertion show that the arm was very weak. A. megagracilis is more advanced than even Tyrannosaurus rex in
forelimb reduction, and this indicates that given a little more time albertosaurs would have abandoned them altogether. Time it did not have, for the rarity ofA. megagracilis relative to T. rex suggests that, like many other latest Cretaceous dinosaurs, it was in trouble. If so, then the big albertosaur lineage may have been doomed even if the great extinction had not taken place. This lineage’s decline seems to have been due to the lessening numbers of their preferred prey, duckbills, in Maastrichtian time, not because the genus was intrinsically inferior to Tyrannosaurus. Aside from T. rex, the competitor of A. megagracilis was the small and equally rare A. lancensis.
Taxon Treatment
- Paul, G. S.; 1988: Predatory Dinosaurs of the World Simon and Schuster: 333-336. doi
This treatment was originally uploaded by Plazi, compare this treatment on Plazi. Unless this treatment has been substantially changed on Species-ID, Plazi requests to maintain a link back to the original repository.
