|Notice:||This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see
). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly.
This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
TY - JOUR
See also the citation download page at the journal.
Tardrabassus pakneunensis sp. n.
Robust, depressed leafhoppers. Color mostly dark brown to black with few symmetrical yellow markings.
Head in dorsal view (Fig. 1A) wider than pronotum; crown short, more than four times wider than long, anterior and posterior margins parallel; texture longitudinally rugulose and with numerous minute pits; with indistinct transverse depression preapically; ocelli small, on crown just posterad of anterior margin, mesad of antennal pits and well separated from eyes; anterior margin of head depressed, forming distinct shelf in lateral view (Fig. 1B), transition from crown to face narrow but smooth, without transverse carina; frontoclypeus in anterior view (Fig. 2A) evenly broadened from anteclypeus to dorsal margin, convex and rugulose ventrally, concave and transversely striate dorsally; antennal ledge closer to anterodorsal than to anteroventral corner of eye, represented by prominent carina, slightly oblique, nearly horizontal, not concealing antennal base; antenna length one third width of head; lateral frontal sutures extended dorsomesad from antennal pits to margin of crown, not reaching ocelli; gena broad, obtusely incised ventrad of eye, with obtuse ventrolateral projection almost completely concealing proepisternum; lorum large, flat, dorsal 2/3 bordering frontoclypeus, ventral 1/3 bordering anteclypeus, extended nearly to ventral margin of gena; maxillary sensillum near mid-height of lorum, closer to lorum than to lateral margin of gena; anteclypeus small slightly convex, ovoid, with transverse preapical concavity, apical margin carinate, rounded and slightly upturned, extended slightly beyond ventral margin of gena; rostrum with distal segment greatly expanded and depressed, lamelliform.
Pronotum depressed, anterior margin produced but not extended anterad of eyes medially (Fig. 1A), posterior margin weakly concave, transverse rugae well developed, lateral margin shorter than eye, carinate. Exposed part of mesonotum and scutellum as long as pronotum; mesonotum rugulose; scutellum transversely striate, apex acuminate. Forewing (Fig. 1C) smoky hyaline throughout length except small opaquely sclerotized area along costal margin, with minute setae and pits present on claval veins and on veins in basal third of corium; appendix very broad, crenulate, extended around wing apex; vein RA1 arising distad of RA-RP fork; crossvein s present; crossvein r-m1 connected to RP; three m-cu crossveins present; brachial cell narrow, parallel sided; CuA connected to submarginal vein slightly distad of clavus apex; inner apical cell long, maximum width subequal to that of apical cell 2; Pcu and A1 sinuate. Hind wing venation complete (Fig. 1D); RP and MA free, connected by crossvein; m-cu long and oblique; costal margin not humped near base; wing margin beyond submarginal vein wide; submarginal vein not extended onto jugum. Front femur (Fig. 2B) anterior surface with numerous scattered, poorly differentiated setae, AV with few long, fine setae basally; tibia (Fig. 2C) with dorsal surface flattened but not expanded, dorsal rows undifferentiated, ventral rows with few stout preapical macrosetae. Hind femur (Fig. 2D) with setal formula 2+2 with penultimate pair well separated; tibial row PD with alternating short and long macrosetae, AD with macrosetal bases spinelike, with 4-8 cucullate intercalary setae between successive macrosetae, AV with ~7 macrosetae and 2-5 cucullate intercalary setae between successive macrosetae, PV with numerous long tapered setae, pecten with 2 transverse rows of spines, distal row with macrosetae alternating short-long; tarsomere I long, without dorsoapical macrosetae or ventral heel, rows AV and PV differentiated but irregular, pecten with 2-3 platellae laterally and 3-4 tapered pale setae medially; tarsomere II less than 1/3 length of tarsomere I.
Male abdomen with tergite I transverse, acrotergite small, elliptical; ventral apodemes absent. Sternite VIII longer than sternite VII, posterior margin roundly produced, concealing ~2/3 of subgenital plate in repose. Valve very short, straplike, narrowly fused to pygofer (Fig. 2E). Subgenital plates (Figs 2E, K) ligulate, strongly depressed, medial margin straight; lateral margin rounded, widened to 1/3 length, thence narrowed to bluntly rounded apex; with numerous scattered setae of various sizes ventrally, more densely distributed toward lateral margin. Pygofer (Fig. 2E) with tergite short, bandlike, with short dorsal and ventral clefts at base of lateral lobes; lobes large, quadrate, extended well beyond subgenital plate apex, without processes, with numerous scattered setae of various sizes distributed in distal ¾. Anal tube (Fig. 2F) moderately long, well sclerotized dorsally, without processes. Style (Fig. 2J) apodeme massive, expanded apically, extended dorsad at right angle to apophysis; basolateral lobe large, rounded; apophysis elongate, slender, with several prominent ventral preapical teeth, apex slightly expanded and blunt. Connective (Fig. 2I) large, well sclerotized, Y-shaped, stem longer than arms. Aedeagus (Figs 2G–H) with atrium large, with median longitudinal ventral carina; shaft L-shaped, tubular, tapered distally, gonopore apical on anterior surface. Interior membrane of genital capsule (Fig. 2F) with two pairs of large, partially sclerotized lateral lobes enclosing aedeagal shaft, dorsal pair with numerous conspicuous microtrichia; pair of sclerotized vertical flaps articulated basad of lobes extended between aedeagus and base of anal tube.
Southeast Asia (Laos).
The genus name, a masculine noun, was formed by combining the names of three genera that resemble the new genus in certain respects: Tartessus, Drabescus, and Iassus, reflecting the apparently mixed morphological affinities of the genus.
Tardrabassus is difficult to place in the present subfamily classification of leafhoppers. The structure of the head somewhat resembles that of Drabescus (Deltocephalinae: Paraboloponini) in coloration and in the form of the antennal ledges and shape of the facial sclerites. It also resembles Tartessus (Tartessinae) in having cucullate intercalary setae on hind tibial row AD. It resembles both of these genera in the form of the pronotum (produced medially with prominent transverse rugae) and forewing (broad appendix extended around wing apex, venation complete and well delimited). The placement of the ocelli on the crown, the dorsally obsolete lateral frontal sutures, and the poorly differentiated chaetotaxy of the front femur distinguish the new genus from Drabescus and most Tartessinae (except some Thymbrini--recently transferred from Ledrinae by Jones and Deitz (2009)), but are consistent with both Iassinae and Ledrinae. Ledrinae have the ocelli on the crown, but distant from the anterior margin and have the ocellocular area of the face much wider. In the structure of the male genitalia, however, Tardrabassus is most similar to Iassinae. The pregenital sternite is enlarged with the posterior margin produced, concealing the basal half of the subgenital plates when the genital capsule is retracted, a synapomorphy of Iassinae. Other aspects of the male genitalia, including the ligulate subgenital plates, the sigmoid style, and the simple aedeagus are all plesiomorphic features shared with various other leafhopper groups. The unusual combination of plesiomorphic (e.g., poorly differentiated front femoral chaetotaxy, presence of an r-m crossvein in the hind wing) and apomorphic features (e.g., retracted male genital capsule, broad gena) suggests that Tardrabassus represents either an early diverging lineage of Iassinae or a lineage distinct from previously recognized cicadellid subfamilies. Among previously described genera of Iassinae it is perhaps most similar to the Neotropical genus Bythonia (Bythoniini), but differs in having the ocelli on the crown, the antennal ledges and lateral frontal sutures reduced, and the dorsum without conspicuous setae.
The distal segment of the rostrum of Tardrabassus is more strongly expanded than in any other known leafhopper. Similar, although less extreme, conditions occur in Coriojassus Evans (Iassinae) and in various Idiocerini. The shape of the distal segment varies among the three pinned males available for study, possibly because the expanded part is partially membranous and became distorted as a result of drying. In other leafhoppers that exhibit a similar condition, it occurs only in males. We cannot confirm that the condition is sexually dimorphic in Tardrabassus because females remain unknown. The function of this modification is also unknown.
- Dai, W; Dietrich, C; 2012: A remarkable new genus of leafhoppers (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Iassinae) from Southeast Asia ZooKeys, 239: 95-102. doi
- Jones J, Deitz L (2009) Phyogeny and systematics of the leafhopper subfamily Ledrinae (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Zootaxa 2186: 1-120.