Formica tianshanica

From Species-ID
Jump to: navigation, search
Notice: This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.

If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly.

This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Seifert, B., Schultz, R. (2009) A taxonomic revision of the Formica rufibarbis Fabricius, 1793 group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).. Myrmecologische Nachrichten 12 : 267 – 268, doi. Versioned wiki page: 2014-07-08, version 54517, , contributors (alphabetical order): PlaziBot.

Citation formats to copy and paste


author = {Seifert, B. AND Schultz, R.},
journal = {Myrmecologische Nachrichten},
title = {A taxonomic revision of the Formica rufibarbis Fabricius, 1793 group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).},
year = {2009},
volume = {12},
issue = {},
pages = {267 -- 268},
doi = {TODO},
url = {},
note = {Versioned wiki page: 2014-07-08, version 54517, , contributors (alphabetical order): PlaziBot.}


RIS/ Endnote:

T1 - A taxonomic revision of the Formica rufibarbis Fabricius, 1793 group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).
A1 - Seifert, B.
A1 - Schultz, R.
Y1 - 2009
JF - Myrmecologische Nachrichten
JA -
VL - 12
IS -
UR -
SP - 267
EP - 268
PB -
M1 - Versioned wiki page: 2014-07-08, version 54517, , contributors (alphabetical order): PlaziBot.

M3 - doi:TODO

Wikipedia/ Citizendium:

<ref name="Seifert2009Myrmecologische Nachrichten12">{{Citation
| author = Seifert, B., Schultz, R.
| title = A taxonomic revision of the Formica rufibarbis Fabricius, 1793 group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).
| journal = Myrmecologische Nachrichten
| year = 2009
| volume = 12
| issue =
| pages = 267 -- 268
| pmid =
| publisher =
| doi = TODO
| url =
| pmc =
| accessdate = 2020-11-23

}} Versioned wiki page: 2014-07-08, version 54517, , contributors (alphabetical order): PlaziBot.</ref>

See also the citation download page at the journal.


Ordo: Hymenoptera
Familia: Formicidae
Genus: Formica


Formica tianshanica Seifert, B., 2009Wikispecies linkPensoft Profile

  • Formica tianshanica Seifert, B., 2009, Myrmecologische Nachrichten 12: 267-268.


Derivatio nominis: from Tian Shan, the region of the first finding.

Materials Examined

Type material examined: Holotype worker plus 4 worker paratypes labelled "KIR: 42.4079° N, 73.7893° E Kap Tshigai valley, R. Schultz 1998.07.16-004" and " Holotype Formica tianshanica Seifert & Schultz " / " Paratype Formica tianshanica Seifert & Schultz ", SMN Goerlitz; 3 mounted paratype workers and 10 paratype workers in ethanol, coll. RS. Material examined: 32 samples with 119 workers were subject to a numeric character analysis (Fig. 21): China (28), Kazakhstan (1), Kyrgyzstan (3). For details, see Appendix, as digital supplementary material to this article, at the journal's web pages.


Description of worker (Tab. 1, Figs. 9, 16): small Ser-viformica species (CS 1.220 mm). Compared to F. cuni-cularia, head more elongated (CL / CW1.4 1.143), scape slightly shorter (SL / CL1.4 1.057) and petiole narrower (PEW / CS1.4 0.434). Distance between lateral ocelli moderate (OceD / CS1.4 0.165), eyes rather large (EYE / CS1.4 0.299). Frontal triangle finely transversely rippled and with 25 - 40 short pubescence hairs. Eyes with microsetae of 7 -12 μ m maximum length. Total mean of unilateral setae numbers on different body parts predicted for a specimen with CS = 1.4 mm: pronotum 1.7, mesonotum 0.5, flexor profile of hind tibia 0.6. Petiole, posterior margin of head, propodeum, and dorsolateral metapleuron normally without setae. Ventral coxae and gaster tergites with long setae. Dorsal mesonotum in lateral aspect broadly convex. Meta-notal depression of moderate depth. Propodeal dome in profile convex, the basal profile sometimes slightly concave, in smaller specimens more or less linear and horizontal. Dorsal crest of petiole in frontal view bluntly angled in smaller specimens to broadly convex in larger specimens in which the median portion is occasionally linear or weakly excavate. Petiole scale in lateral aspect slender, with convex anterior and more straight posterior profile. Gaster ter-gites with transverse microripples of a significantly larger distance than in F. cunicularia (RipD 6.2 μ m, Fig. 16), increasing from West (W-Tianshan, E-Kazakhstan: 5.7 μ m) to East (Bogda Shan: 6.5 μ m). Dorsum of gaster covered by dense silvery pubescence (sqPDG 3.3). Pubescence on head, mesosoma and petiole less dense, ants appear mildly shining. Posterior vertex, sometimes dorsal promesonotum, coxae, and all appendages normally brown, gaster always dark brown. Other body parts more or less reddish, in the Bogda Shan population more yellowish-brown.


Comments on taxonomy: The character combination and overall phenotypic impression of F. tianshanica sp. n. is similar to that of F. cunicularia and F. persica sp. n., and we assume that these species are closely related allopatric and parapatric species. The discrimination, however, seems to be no problem. A three-class DA considering the characters CS, CL / CW1.4, SL / CS1.4, OceD / CS1.4, EYE / CS1.4, PEW / CS1.4, nPN1.4, nMN1.4, nPRME1.4, nPE1.4, nHFFL1.4, RipD1.4, sqPDG1.4, and PIGM 1.4, separated each of the 138 nest samples of these three species with p> 0.97 and 0% error indication in a LOOCV-DA (Fig. 17). The type samples were allocated to the right clusters with the following probabilities: neotype sample of F. cunicu-laria (p = 1.000), the holotype sample of F. cunicularia fuscoides and syntype sample of F. fusca var. rubescens (both p = 1.000, to F. cunicularia), the holotype sample of F. tianshanica sp. n. (p = 0.999) and holotype sample of F. persica sp. n. (p = 0.998). F. tianshanica sp. n. is in no contact with F. persica sp. n. but is sympatric with F. cunicu-laria in the Tarbagatay-Saur Mountains in East Kazakhstan. There seems to exist no reduction of interspecific pheno-typic contrast in this sympatric region but the small sample size available does not allow to really discuss possible interspecific hybridisation. Considerable morphological variation within the F. tianshanica sp. n. population is apparently existing in the gynes: Two gynes from the Tian Shan and Tarbagatay differ from five gynes from the Bogda Shan by larger CS, smaller OceD / CS and EYE / CS, more voluminous meso-somas and lighter colour. The sparse information currently available does not allow to decide if these differences represent a gyne dimorphism (as for instance found in European Formica fusca) or indicate different allopatric species. Since there are no significant differences between the worker populations of Tian Shan and Bogda Shan, we provisionally assume a gyne polymorphism but the problem needs a detailed investigation by integrative taxonomy.

Materials Examined

China China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan China Bogda Shan Kazakhstan Saur Kyrgyzstan Kara Bura Kyrgyzstan Kap Tshigai


Distribution and biology: Only known from mountain areas of the Turkestanian floristic subregion (Tian Shan, Tarbagatay-Saur, Bogda Shan). Range between 71° and 89° E and 42° and 47° N. Apparently rare in regions with competing montane and subalpine Serviformica species as observed in the Tian Shan, Tarbagatay and Quin Ling Shan. In contrast, very abundant in the Bogda Shan where these competitors are missing, occupying here a wide altitudinal range from 1380 to 3010 metres. This correlates with variable habitat selection in Bogda Shan: it was found here in pastures of any kind above and below the tree line, in open rural areas, in clear-cuttings of former Picea forest, in habitat mosaics of grassland, Picea and Juniperus and in light Picea forests.

Taxon Treatment

  • Seifert, B.; Schultz, R.; 2009: A taxonomic revision of the Formica rufibarbis Fabricius, 1793 group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)., Myrmecologische Nachrichten 12: 267-268. doi
Link to

This treatment was originally uploaded by Plazi, compare this treatment on Plazi. Unless this treatment has been substantially changed on Species-ID, Plazi requests to maintain a link back to the original repository.

No known copyright restrictions apply on this formal expression of scientific knowledge. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for details.