Pristimantis lucasi
| Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Duellman2008Zootaxa1918, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Duellman2008Zootaxa1918">{{Citation |
Ordo: Anura
Familia: Strabomantidae
Genus: Pristimantis
Name
Pristimantis lucasi Duellman, William E., 2008 – Wikispecies link – Pensoft Profile
- Pristimantis lucasi Duellman, William E., 2008, Zootaxa 1918: 14-18.
Materials Examined
Holotype:KU 311454 – 55, MHNC6475, an adult female, from Abra Esperanza, 2790 m, Distrito Oxapampa, Provincia Oxapampa, Departamento Pasco, Peru (10 ° 31 ' 54.4 " S, 75 ° 20 ' 58.5 " W) one of a series collected on 4 September 2007 by Juan Carlos Chaparro, Aaron Quiroz, and David Salcedo. Paratopotypes:KU 311454 –C 55, MHNC 6476, 6478, 6494, 6500, 6504–05, 6526, 6536, and 6565, seven males and five females, collected on 4–10 September 2007 by the same persons, and MHNC7155, a male, obtained by Juan Carlos Chaparro on 15 May 2008.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis. The new species is placed in the Pristimantis (Pristimantis) unistrigatus Group (as defined by Hedges et al., 2008 a) because it has expanded digital discs supported by T-shaped terminal phalanges, Finger I shorter than Finger II, and Toe V much longer than Toe III. It has: (1) skin on dorsum smooth with scattered subconical tubercles; that on venter weakly areolate with scattered rounded tubercles; discoidal fold not evident; dorsolateral folds absent; (2) tympanic membrane not differentiated; tympanic annulus absent; (3) snout rounded in dorsal view, bluntly rounded in profile; (4) upper eyelid bearing two large, conical tubercles, slightly less than one half IOD; cranial crests absent; (5) dentigerous processes of vomers absent; (6) males having vocal slits; nuptial pads absent; (7) Finger I shorter than Finger II; discs expanded, truncate, about twice as wide as digits proximal to pads; (8) fingers bearing lateral fringes; (9) ulnar tubercles conical; (10) heel bearing single subconical tubercle; outer edge of tarsus bearing two or three conical tubercles; inner tarsal fold absent; (11) inner metatarsal tubercle elongately elliptical, elevated; no discrete outer metatarsal tubercle; supernumerary plantar tubercles numerous, rounded; (12) toes bearing lateral fringes; webbing absent; Toe V much longer than Toe III; discs equal in size to those on fingers; (13) dorsum with or without bold transverse or longitudinal dark brown markings; venter pale gray with irregular brown or black markings; (14) SVL 15.5–19.1 mm in males, 20.9–23.7 mm in females. Only five other species of Pristimantis in Peru have conical tubercles on the upper eyelid and heel and do not have a differentiated tympanic membrane and tympanic annulus. Two of these species, P. altamazonicus (Barbour and Dunn) and P. flavobracatus (Lehr, Lundberg, Aguilar, and von May) differ from P. l u c a s i by lacking lateral fringes on the fingers and toes; moreover, the former also differs from P. l u c a s i by lacking ulnar tubercles and having red and black mottling in the groin and on the posterior surfaces of the thighs, whereas P. flavobracatus further differs from P. l u c a s i by having a bright yellow groin. Pristimantis colodactylus (Lynch) differs from P. l u c a s i by having short fingers with broadly rounded terminal discs, no ulnar tubercles, and no labial bars. Pristimantis vilcabambae Lehr differs from P. l u c a s i by having a rostral papilla, and H-shaped scapular fold, and a brown groin with cream spots (in preservative). The equally sized P. leucorrhinus Boano, Mazzotti, and Sindaco from an elevation of 2500 m in the Parque Nacional Yanachaga-Chemillén is the species that is most like P. lucasi, especially in having numerous tubercles on the belly. However, P. leucorrhinus differs by having several conical and subconical tubercles on the eyelid; one of these is notably larger than the tubercles on P. l u c a s i and is curved terminally. Furthermore in P. leucorrhinus the throat, groin, and anterior surfaces of the thighs are black, and there is a pair of large white spots on the anteroventral surfaces of the thighs. For comparative character states in strabomantids in the region of the known distribution of P. l u c a s i, see Table 1.
Description
Description of holotype. An adult female with head about as wide as body; head width 32.7 % of SVL; head length 31.4 % of SVL; snout rounded in dorsal view, bluntly rounded in profile, barely protruding beyond margin of lower jaw; eye-nostril distance 69.6 % of diameter of eye; nostrils not protuberant, directed slightly anterolaterally at level just behind anterior edge of lower jaw. Canthus rostralis curved, rounded in section, not elevated; loreal region concave; lips rounded; internarial region slightly depresssed; top of head flat; upper eyelid bearing two large, conical tubercles an a few small tubercles; its width 45.5 % of IOD; supratympanic fold barely evident, only just posterior to orbit; tympanic membrane not differentiated, tympanic annulus absent; no enlarged postrictal tubercles. Choanae small, nearly round, not obscured by palatal shelf; dentigerous processes of vomers not evident; tongue small about twice as long as wide, not notched behind, barely free posteriorly. Skin on dorsum smooth with scattered small, conical tubercles; skin on flanks smooth; skin on belly weakly areolate with many scattered rounded tubercles; skin on posteroventral surfaces of thighs coarsely areolate; other ventral surfaces smooth; discoid fold not evident; dorsolateral folds absent; cloacal sheath short, no tubercles in cloacal region. Ulnar tubercles conical, three on each forearm; thenar tubercle elongately elliptical, elevated; palmar tubercle small, deeply bifid; subarticular tubercles large, rounded; supernumerary tubercles prominent, numerous; fingers lacking lateral fringes; relative lengths of fingers I <II <IV <III; Finger I shorter than Finger II; discs on outer fingers expanded, almost truncate, about twice width of digit proximal to disc; all fingers having terminal ventral pads well defined by circumferential grooves (Fig. 1 A). Hind limbs moderately robust; when hind limbs flexed perpendicular to axis of body, heels barely overlap; tibia length 48.9 % of SVL; foot length 45.4 % of SVL; heel bearing one subconical tubercle; outer edge of tarsus bearing conical tubercles (two on right; three on left); tarsal fold absent; inner metatarsal tubercle elongately elliptical, elevated, outer metatarsal tubercle absent; toes slender, bearing lateral fringes and elliptical terminal discs about same size as those on fingers; webbing absent; relative lengths of toes I <II <III <V <IV; Toe III much shorter than Toe V; Toe III extending to proximal base of antepenultimate subarticular tubercle on Toe IV; Toe V extending to proximal base of penultimate subarticular tubercle on Toe IV; subarticular tubercles large, rounded; supernumerary tubercles rounded, numerous on proximal segments of digits (Fig. 1 B).
Coloration in preservative: Dorsum pale gray with dark grayish brown markings, those on head consisting of large spot on top of head anterior to orbits, broad canthal stripe, two diagonal labial bars, narrow postorbital stripe, broad interorbital bar. Body with three broad transverse marks, one in scapular region, one on sacral region, and one postsacrally; first two continue as diagonal marks on flanks. Broad transverse brown bar on forearm; narrower bar on wrist; diagonal bars on hind limbs—two on thigh, two or three on shanks, two on tarsus, one on foot; groin and posterior surfaces of thighs pale greenish yellow with black subcloacal triangle. Venter pale grayish white with irregular black marks, largest on chin and anterolaterally on belly. Coloration in life: Dorsum pale tan with large dark reddish brown markings—spot anterior to eyes, broad interorbital bar, labial and postorbital bars, broad transverse marks on body (scapular and sacral regions and postsacrally) extending diagonally onto flanks, and diagonal bars on hind limbs (Fig. 2 A); groin, posterior surfaces of thighs, and ventral surfaces of shanks pale greenish tan. Throat and belly dull yellowish tan with brown tubercles and lateral blotches on belly and reddish brown marks on throat; palmar and plantar surfaces brown (Fig. 2 B); iris pale bronze with reddish brown flecks and narrow streaks. Measurements of holotype in mm: SVL 22.3, tibia length 10.9, foot length 9.5, head length 7.0, head width 7.3, IOD 4.4, internarial distance 1.9, width of upper eyelid 2.0, diameter of eye 2.3, eye-nostril distance 1.6.
Variation.— Females are slightly larger than males (Table 1). Males have proportionately larger heads and longer shanks than females; otherwise the proportions greatly overlap. All specimens are alike in having two conical tubercles on the upper eyelid and in the anterior tubercle larger than the posterior one. There are two or three conical ulnar tubercles and two or three conical tubercles on the outer edge of the tarsus. Three specimens have a second, somewhat smaller conical tubercle of the heel (Table 2). Photographs of living individuals and examination of preserved specimens revealed three color patterns. Eight individuals (four males, four females) have essentially the pattern described for the holotype, that is, transverse marks on the dorsum; in two males and one female the markings are narrower than those in the holotype. Three males have an irregular longitudinal dark mark on the body (Fig. 2 C), and two others essentially lack markings on the body (Fig. 2 E). The ventral coloration varies from the irregular black marks displayed by the holotype to dark brown reticulations (Fig. 2 D) or solely dark brown tubercles on the belly (Fig. 2 F).
Species Hyp. lundbergi Tympanic membrane Yes Eyelid tubercles No Skin on venter Smooth Fingers I=II Toes V=III Lateral fringes F,T Maximum SVL males;females 39.7; 48.8Range of elevation 1800–2760Nob. duellmani No Small Smooth I<II V<III–,–—; 20.0 2900Phr. auriculatus Phr. bracki Yes No No Small Smooth Smooth I<II I<II V>III V>III–,– F,–13.4; 14.5 16.2; 19.8 2600 2600Phr. bufoides No No Areolate I<II V>III–.–23.9; 33.6 3850–4100Phr. miroslawae Phr. nicoleae No No Small Small Areolate Areolate I<II I=II V=III V<III–,– –,–—; 29.1 —; 21.2 3360 3589Phr. paucari No No Areolate I<II V>III–,–—; 23.8 3600Phr. pesantesi Phr. tribulosus No No No Small Areolate Smooth I<II I=II V>III V=III–,– –,–25.5; 32.7 15.2; 14.6 4280–4390 2600–2700Pri. aniptopalmatus Yes1 round Smooth I<II V>III F,–23.2; 22.0 2300–2600Pri. bipunctatus Pri.bromeliaceus Yes Yes No Small Areolate Areolate I=II I<II V>III V>>III–,– F,T28.8; 41.5 26.0; 32.8 1240–2320 2200–2600Pri. flavobracatus No2 round Areolate I<II V>>III–,–19.6; 23.4 1770Pri. leucorrhinus * Pri. lucasi No No1 conical 2 conical Areolate Areolate I<II I<II V>>III V>>III F,T F,T21.1; — 19.1; 23.7 2500 2790Pri. mendax Yes No Areolate I<II V>>III F,T23.3; 28.0 1700–3325Pri. ornatus Pri. pardalinus*Yes Yes No 1 round Smooth Areolate I<II I<II V>III V>III–,– F,T20.5; 27.3 26.7; 34.1 2400–3000 2640Pri. platydactylus Yes Small Areolate I<II V>>III F,T23.8; 35.3 930–3470Pri. rhabdocnemus Pri.sagittulus No Yes No No Areolate Areolate1<II I<II V>>III V>>III F,T F,T21.2; 27.0 25.7–29.9 230–2900 1970–2750Pri. spectabilis Yes No Smooth I<II V>>III–,–—; 22.7 3300Pri. stictogaster Yes Small Areolate I<II V>>III F,–17.7; 23.9 1470–2790 *Also small tubercles on eyelids.
Distribution
Distribution and ecology. This species inhabits an area of humid elfin montane forest just below the crest of the Abra Esperanza (± 3000 m). All individuals were on low vegetation 30–100 cm above the ground at night during the dry season. Other sympatric strabomantid frogs are Phrynopus auriculatus Duellman and Hedges, and five species of Pristimantis—P. bromeliaceus (Lynch), P. mendax (Duellman), P. rhabdocnemus (Duellman and Hedges), P. sagittulus (Lehr, Aguilar and Duellman), and P. stictogaster (Duellman and Hedges).
Etymology
Etymology. The specific name is a patronym for Lucas Morciniec, who has supported field studies in Peru.
Discussion
Remarks. With the full realization that the Pristimantis unistrigatus Group is a paraphyletic assemblage (Hedges et al.,2008 a; Lynch & Duellman, 1997), we assign this new species to that group, because it does not “conveniently” fit in any other group in the genus. Pristimantis lucasi and P. leucorrhinus are unique among Peruvian members of the genus in having areolate skin on the venter that is bedecked with many prominent, round tubercles. These seem to be cryptic species, like two other pairs in the Cordillera Yanachaga named by Duellman and Hedges (2005, 2008)— P. adiastolus and P. bipunctatus; P. albertus and P. stictogaster.
Taxon Treatment
- Duellman, William E.; Chaparro, Juan Carlos; 2008: Two distinctive new species of Pristimantis (Anura: Strabomantidae) from the Cordillera Oriental with a distributional synopsis of strabomantids in Central Peru, Zootaxa 1918: 14-18. doi
This treatment was originally uploaded by Plazi, compare this treatment on Plazi. Unless this treatment has been substantially changed on Species-ID, Plazi requests to maintain a link back to the original repository.
