Goniobranchus pseudodecorus

From Species-ID
Jump to: navigation, search
Notice: This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.

If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly.

This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Yonow N (2018) Red Sea Opisthobranchia 5: new species and new records of chromodorids from the Red Sea (Heterobranchia, Nudibranchia, Chromodorididae). ZooKeys (770) : 9–42, doi. Versioned wiki page: 2018-07-04, version 169632, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Goniobranchus_pseudodecorus&oldid=169632 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.

Citation formats to copy and paste

BibTeX:

@article{Yonow2018ZooKeys,
author = {Yonow, Nathalie},
journal = {ZooKeys},
publisher = {Pensoft Publishers},
title = {Red Sea Opisthobranchia 5: new species and new records of chromodorids from the Red Sea (Heterobranchia, Nudibranchia, Chromodorididae)},
year = {2018},
volume = {},
issue = {770},
pages = {9--42},
doi = {10.3897/zookeys.770.26378},
url = {https://zookeys.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=26378},
note = {Versioned wiki page: 2018-07-04, version 169632, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Goniobranchus_pseudodecorus&oldid=169632 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.}

}

RIS/ Endnote:

TY - JOUR
T1 - Red Sea Opisthobranchia 5: new species and new records of chromodorids from the Red Sea (Heterobranchia, Nudibranchia, Chromodorididae)
A1 - Yonow N
Y1 - 2018
JF - ZooKeys
JA -
VL -
IS - 770
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.770.26378
SP - 9
EP - 42
PB - Pensoft Publishers
M1 - Versioned wiki page: 2018-07-04, version 169632, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Goniobranchus_pseudodecorus&oldid=169632 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.

M3 - doi:10.3897/zookeys.770.26378

Wikipedia/ Citizendium:

<ref name="Yonow2018ZooKeys">{{Citation
| author = Yonow N
| title = Red Sea Opisthobranchia 5: new species and new records of chromodorids from the Red Sea (Heterobranchia, Nudibranchia, Chromodorididae)
| journal = ZooKeys
| year = 2018
| volume =
| issue = 770
| pages = 9--42
| pmid =
| publisher = Pensoft Publishers
| doi = 10.3897/zookeys.770.26378
| url = https://zookeys.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=26378
| pmc =
| accessdate = 2024-12-23

}} Versioned wiki page: 2018-07-04, version 169632, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Goniobranchus_pseudodecorus&oldid=169632 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.</ref>

See also the citation download page at the journal.


Taxonavigation

Ordo: Nudibranchia
Familia: Chromodorididae
Genus: Goniobranchus

Name

Goniobranchus pseudodecorus Yonow, 2018 sp. n.Wikispecies linkZooBank linkPensoft Profile

Type material

HOLOTYPE SMF 349570: Hotel Zabargad, 120 km south of Marsa Alam, Egypt, Feb 2003, 16 mm alive (9 × 4 mm preserved), leg. and photographs J Hinterkircher. PARATYPE SMF 349571: Balena wreck, Hurghada, Egypt, 02 Aug 2012, 9 m depth, approx. 15 mm alive (10 × 3 mm preserved), leg. S Kahlbrock (SK # 19).

Other material

Quseir, Egypt, July 2000, approx. 10 mm alive (6 × 2.5 mm preserved), leg. and photographs J Hinterkircher (jaw and radular preparations); Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, photographs only from 1980’s, Pam Kemp, J Kuchinke, G Smith; Eilat, Israel, 18 Feb 2005, O Ledermann; near Hurghada, Egypt, 07 July 2012, 12 June 2016, S Kahlbrock.

Diagnosis

Body shape rounded oblong anteriorly and rounded posteriorly. Opaque white pointed tail always longer than mantle. Dorsum translucent rose centrally and whiter marginally, with meandering longitudinal opaque white lines and round rose spots. Margin translucent orange with elongated opaque white patches.

Description

The shape of this species is very distinctive: all photographs depict an elongated oval body of which the anterior margin is oblong and the posterior end is rounded (Plate 7). The pointed tail extends beyond the mantle, and is translucent white with an opaque white triangular marking centrally. The mantle is translucent rose with longitudinal interrupted opaque white lines and round pink spots that are ocellated with deeper rose. Around this area is a band of white patches that may be confluent, followed by a translucent orange band containing discrete white patches. The rhinophores are translucent orange with two inner opaque white areas; there are up to 12 lamellae and the translucent stalks issue from translucent, slightly raised sheaths. The 6–8 unipinnate gills are arranged in a simple circle; they are also translucent with opaque white cores; the orange pigment in the tips is within the translucent area. The preserved specimens are not totally contracted, and still retain the opaque white lines on the dorsum; however, no coloured spots remain on any of the specimens. The almost black digestive gland within is clearly visible. The edges of the foot are slightly crumpled, squared anteriorly, and the oral tentacles are visible as swollen nipples (Figure 4A). The anterior margin of the foot does not appear to be bilaminate. The 2012 specimen from Hurghada is aberrant in having two left rhinophores.
The notes made on the paratype on arrival read as follows: “dorsum dense, opaque dirty orange, glistening white lines, coloured areas still visible on rhinophores and gills (the latter were darker). Two left rhinophores but one right. Mantle margin distinct, separate, mantle glands visible posteriorly. Ventrally, the hyponotum a darker orange, foot lighter. Foot anterior margin angular with a slight median dent, large swollen oral tentacles.”
The reproductive system is developed in the 6 mm specimen (collected in the summer), despite its being smaller than the types and the average recorded length, with ducts and glands clearly visible as well as the bursa copulatrix.
This same specimen has a radular formula of 27–28 × 28–33.1.33–28. There is a small (up to 15 µm long) central triangular tooth medially, crowded by the first lateral teeth (Figure 4B). The first lateral is twisted on itself, with one or two large denticles medially and a row of four small saw-like denticles laterally (Figure 4B). The length of the cusp increases quickly to approximately tooth 9 as does the number of denticles, also to nine. In this region, the twist of the cusp is still pronounced and forms a small knob at the top of the root/cusp junction. At approximately tooth number 13–15 until the last five teeth, the cusps are somewhat straighter on the root with a pronounced knob on the top (Figure 4C); the denticles are saw-like. The last five teeth are stacked together and very reduced in size, flattened plates tapering towards the end with few denticles (Figure 4C).
The jaws are composed of curved rodlets. These are bifid on the tip, with one denticle being much smaller than the other (Figure 4D).

Remarks

Although Eliot (1908)[1] compares his specimen to Chromodoris maculosa Pease, subsequent records have shown it to be quite different and consistently so over time. Goniobranchus pseudodecorus sp. n. has been recorded from the Red Sea a number of times (Yonow 1989[3], Perrone and Doneddu 2001[2], http://www.seaslugforum.net/find/13213, Yonow 2008[4]). Goniobranchus decorus (Pease), to which this species has been compared, does not occur in the Red Sea but has a western Pacific distribution: it is similar to G. pseudodecorus sp. n. in having a translucent orange margin and pointed white foot, but there are different white markings on the dorsum, large purple patches in the orange and white marginal bands, and the rhinophore pigmentation is without banding. The body is not so obviously angular anteriorly as in G. pseudodecorus sp. n. The radular formula of a 16 mm-preserved specimen from Australia is 52 (+3) × 48.0.48 and the teeth vary similarly along the row (Rudman 1986b[5]: 331).

Distribution

Endemic to the Red Sea. The first record of this species is by Eliot (1908)[1] from the Sudanese Red Sea in which he describes the same obvious characters of shape and colour: “Elongated and rather flat: mantle broad, especially over head. Foot ends in sharp point projecting… Gills small and thick, seven in number, simply pinnate, the two hindmost smaller. … Colour translucent greyish pink. … broad undefined band of opaque white, and outside, bordering the mantle, a broad transparent orange-yellow line interrupted by opaque white spots along the edge.” The species is clearly endemic to the Red Sea, and I suspect that the Maldives locality of the second photograph in Debelius and Kuiter (2008) is erroneous.

Derivatio nominis

An unimaginative name alluding to the similarities with Goniobranchus decorus.

Original Description

  • Yonow, N; 2018: Red Sea Opisthobranchia 5: new species and new records of chromodorids from the Red Sea (Heterobranchia, Nudibranchia, Chromodorididae) ZooKeys, (770): 9-42. doi

Images

Other References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Eliot C (1908) Reports on the marine biology of the Sudanese Red Sea XI. Notes on a collection of nudibranchs from the Red Sea. Journal of the Linnean Society (Zoology) 31: 86–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1908.tb00457.x
  2. 2.0 2.1 Perrone A, Doneddu M (2001) Pattern convergence in Nudibranchia of the genus Chromodoris Alder & Hancock, 1855 (Opisthobranchia) from the Red Sea and Polycladida (Platyhelminthes) from the Mediterranean Sea. Vita Marina 47(4): 121–130.
  3. Yonow N (1989) Red Sea Opisthobranchia. 2. The family Chromodorididae (Mollusca, Nudibranchia). Fauna of Saudi Arabia 10: 290–309.
  4. Yonow N (2008) Red Sea Sea Slugs. Pensoft Publications, Sofia/Moscow, 304 pp.
  5. Rudman W (1986b) The Chromodorididae (Opisthobranchia: Mollusca) of the Indo-West Pacific: Noumea purpurea and Chromodoris decora colour groups. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 86(4): 309–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1986.tb01814.x