Endynomena pradieri
Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Shi2013ZooKeys284, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Shi2013ZooKeys284">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Coleoptera
Familia: Carabidae
Genus: Endynomena
Name
Endynomena pradieri (Fairmaire, 1849a) – Wikispecies link – Pensoft Profile
- Endynomena pradieri Fairmaire 1849a[1]: 34 (original: Plochionus; type locality: Tahiti Is. (Polynesia); syntype deposited in MNHN); Fairmaire 1849b[2]: 281 (Plochionus); Chaudoir 1872[3]: 186 (Endynomena, Marquises, Pondichéry); Bates 1889[4]: 283 (Endynomena, Saïgon); Andrewes 1919[5]: 483 (Endynomena); Andrewes 1927a[6]: 12, Fig. 9 (Endynomena, Samoa); Andrewes 1929[7]: 314 (Endynomena, Sumatra); Andrewes 1930d[8]: 163 (Endynomena; catalogue); Andrewes 1937[9]: 38 (Endynomena, Bali); Britton 1938[10]: 109 (Endynomena, distribution review); Jedlička 1963[11]: 308, Fig. 42 (Endynomena); Darlington 1968[12]: 140 (Endynomena, New Guinea); Darlington 1970[13]: 44, Fig. 8-a (Endynomena, Micronesia); Shibata 1978[14]: 102 (Endynomena, Japan); Habu 1979b[15]: 63, Figs 1–4 (Endynomena); Habu 1982[16]: 99 (Endynomena); Uéno et al. Sato 1985[17]: 169, pl. 31, Fig. 10 (Endynomena).
- Saronychium inconspicuum Blackburn 1877[18]: 142 (type locality: Hawaiian Is.; syntype deposited in BMNH); Andrewes 1919[5]: 483 (Endynomena, synonymized with pradieri Fairmaire). [Synonym]
- Endynomena huebneri Fairmaire 1878[19]: 286, (type locality: Tonga; syntype deposited in Museum Hamburg (according to Jedlička 1963[11])); Andrewes 1927a[6]: 12 (Endynomena, synonymized with pradieri Fairmaire). [Synonym]
- Thyreopterus paroecus Csiki 1915[20]: 164 (type locality: Samoa; syntype deposited in NMW); Andrewes 1927a[6]: 12 (Endynomena, synonymized with pradieri Fairmaire). [Synonym]
Type examined
Lectotype of Plochionus pradieri Fairmaire, designated herein (MNHN): male, pin mounted, “TYPE” [red label]; “Taïti.” [pink label]; “Plochionus / Dej. / Pradieri / (type) Fairm / Taïti”; “Ex Musaeo / L. Fairmaire / 1896”; “LECTOTYPE ♂ / Plochionus pradieri / Fairmaire, 1849 / des. SHI H. L. 2012” [red label][Fig. 65]. Lectotype of Saronychium inconspicuum Blackburn, designated herein (NHML): male, body length = 7.7 mm, board mounted, “Type” [round label with red circle]; “Hawaiian Is. / Rev. T. Blackburn. / 1888-30”; “LECTOTYPE ♂ / Saronychium inconspicuum / Blackburn, 1877 / des. SHI H. L. 2011” [red label][Fig. 66].
Notes on types
Plochionus pradieri Fairmaire. The original publication didn’t indicate this species was described based on single specimen, and only mentioned the type locality Tahiti in the title. In the collection of MNHN, we found a male from the collection of Fairmaire bearing his determination label and a “type” label. We herein designate this specimen as lectotype (Fig. 65) for taxonomic purpose of fixing the name to unique name-bearing type.
Saronychium inconspicuum Blackburn. Blackburn (1877)[18] didn’t indicate this species was described based on single specimen, and only mentioned the locality “On the plains near Honolulu”. In the collection of NHML, we found a male fitting well with the original description and labeled as type. We herein designate this specimen as lectotype (Fig. 66) for taxonomic purpose of fixing the name to unique name-bearing type.
Endynomena huebneri Fairmaire and Thyreopterus paroecus Csiki. We did not find syntypes nor designate lectotypes for these two synonyms.
Non-type material examined
(Total 4 specimens). China:1 male (CCCC), “Fujian, Jinmen, Gugang, 1995.VII.19, Chen Changchin leg.”[Figs 30, 94, 110]. 1 female (CCCC), “Taiwan, Hualien, Taroko National Park, 1994.IV.5, Lo Chinchi leg.”[Fig. 125]. India: 1 female (NHML), “Nevinson Coll. 1918-14”, “Ex coll. Brit. Mus.”, “Endynomena pradieri, Compared with type H. E. A.”. Vanuatu: 1 male (NHML), “NEW HEBRIDES: Malekula”, “iii.1930. Miss L. E. Cheesman”, “B. M. 1930-395.”, “Endynomena pradieri, H. E. Andrewes det”.
Diagnosis
Dorsal side uniform brownish; pronotal base hardly lobed; elytral striae indistinct, intervals not convex; 7th interval with several setigerous pores. This species is similar to Orionella lewisii. The differences are presented in the diagnosis part of the genus Orionella.
Description
Male genitalia with median lobe of aedeagus tubular, laterally compressed, slightly bent; in dorsal view, strongly bent to right side; apical orifice with basal two-thirds surrounded by long setae; apical lamella very small, placed at right side of apex, apex rounded. Internal sac with main flagellum very short, only reaching basal one-third of median lobe; trumpet-form expansion indistinct, very small and narrow; secondary flagellum weakly sclerotized, half length of median lobe; internal sac with two scaled areas, one near base, adjacent to trumpet-form expansion, the other one near middle, just after the termination of main flagellum (Fig. 94). Female genitalia. Apical segment of ovipositor slightly widened, length three times basal width; apex slightly rounded; sides nearly parallel, base nearly as wide as apex; apical one-third finely setose; membranous extension very narrow, placed on the outer side of apex (Fig. 125). Inner structure of reproductive system not studied.
Detailed description of external characters has been provided by Habu (1979b)[15].
Distribution:
India, Sri Lanka, China (Fujian, Taiwan), Japan, Indo-China Peninsula, Malay Peninsula, the Philippines, Sumatra, Bali, New Guinea, Micronesia, Samoa, Cocos Islands, New Hebrides, Ellice Islands, Hawaii, Tonga, Fiji, Maquesas, Polynesia.
Taxon Treatment
- Shi, H; Zhou, H; Liang, H; 2013: Taxonomic synopsis of the subtribe Physoderina (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Lebiini), with species revisions of eight genera ZooKeys, 284: 1-129. doi
Other References
- ↑ Fairmaire L (1849a) Insectes de Taïti des Marquises et des îles voisines. Revue et Magasin de Zoologie Pure et Appliquée (2) 1: 34–36.
- ↑ Fairmaire L (1849b) Essai sur les Coléoptères de la Polynésie. Revue et Magasin de Zoologie Pure et Appliquée (2) 1: 277–281.
- ↑ Chaudoir B (1872) Monographie des Callidides. Annales de Societe Entomologique de Belgique 16: 97-204.
- ↑ Bates H (1889) Contributions à la faune Indo-chinoise. 3e mémoire. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (6)9: 261–286.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Andrewes H (1919) Papers on Oriental Carabidae. I. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History (9) 3: 469–483. doi: 10.1080/00222931908673846
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Andrewes H (1927a) Insects of Samoa. Carabidae. 4 Coleoptera. London, The Trustees of the British Museum 1927: 1-14.
- ↑ Andrewes H (1929) Fauna Sumatrensis (Beitrag Nr. 64) Carabidae (Col.). Tijdschrift voor Entomologie, 72: 303-340.
- ↑ Andrewes H (1930d) Catalogue of Indian Insects, Part 18–Carabidae. Calcutta. Government of India Central Publication Branch, 389 pp.
- ↑ Andrewes H (1937) On a collection of Carabidae from the island of Bali. Bulletin and Annales de la Societe Royale Belge d’Entomologie 77: 37-46.
- ↑ Britton E (1938) Carabidae of the Society Islands and Rapa (Coleoptera). Occasional Papers Bernice P. Bishop Museum 14 (6): 103-110.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Jedlička A (1963) Monographie der Truncatipennen aus Ostasien, Lebiinae- Odacanthinae- Braehyninae (Coleptera, Carabidae). Entomologische Abhandlungen und Berichte aus dem Staatlichen Museum fuer Tierkunde in Dresden 28: 269-579.
- ↑ Darlington P (1968) The carabid beetles of New Guinea. Part 3. Harpalinae (Continued): Perigonine to Pseudomorphini. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College 137 (1): 1-253.
- ↑ Darlington P (1970) Coleoptera: Carabidae including Cicindelinae. Insects Micronesia 15: 1–49.
- ↑ Shibata T (1978) Notes on the Carabid-beetles of Japan, II. (Coleoptera). Entomological Review of Japan 31(1–2): 102.
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 Habu A (1979b) Notes on Endynomena Chaudoir and Orionella Jedlička (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Entomological Review of Japan 33 (1/2): 61–65.
- ↑ Habu A (1982) Revised and supplementary notes on and descriptions of the Truncatipennes group of Japan (2) (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Entomological Review of Japan 37 (2): 83-118.
- ↑ Uéno S, Kurosawa Y, Satô M (1985) The Coleoptera of Japan in Color Vol. II. Osaka, 514 pp.
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 Blackburn T (1877) Characters of a new genus, and descriptions of new species, of Geodephaga from the Sandwich Islands. The Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 14 [1877–1878]: 142–148.
- ↑ Fairmaire L (1878) Diagnoses de Coléoptères des îles Viti, Samoa, Tonga etc. Petites Nouvelles Entomologiques 2 [1876–1879]: 286.
- ↑ Csiki E (1915) Nachträge. Carabidae der Samoa Inseln. Denkschrift der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse 91: 163-164.
Images
|