Bidessodes

From Species-ID
Jump to: navigation, search
Notice: This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.

If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly.

This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Miller K (2017) A review of the Neotropical genus Bidessodes Régimbart, 1895 including description of four new species (Coleoptera, Adephaga, Dytiscidae, Hydroporinae, Bidessini). ZooKeys (658) : 9–38, doi. Versioned wiki page: 2017-02-22, version 136465, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Bidessodes&oldid=136465 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.

Citation formats to copy and paste

BibTeX:

@article{Miller2017ZooKeys,
author = {Miller, Kelly B.},
journal = {ZooKeys},
publisher = {Pensoft Publishers},
title = {A review of the Neotropical genus Bidessodes Régimbart, 1895 including description of four new species (Coleoptera, Adephaga, Dytiscidae, Hydroporinae, Bidessini)},
year = {2017},
volume = {},
issue = {658},
pages = {9--38},
doi = {10.3897/zookeys.658.10928},
url = {http://zookeys.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=10928},
note = {Versioned wiki page: 2017-02-22, version 136465, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Bidessodes&oldid=136465 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.}

}

RIS/ Endnote:

TY - JOUR
T1 - A review of the Neotropical genus Bidessodes Régimbart, 1895 including description of four new species (Coleoptera, Adephaga, Dytiscidae, Hydroporinae, Bidessini)
A1 - Miller K
Y1 - 2017
JF - ZooKeys
JA -
VL -
IS - 658
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.658.10928
SP - 9
EP - 38
PB - Pensoft Publishers
M1 - Versioned wiki page: 2017-02-22, version 136465, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Bidessodes&oldid=136465 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.

M3 - doi:10.3897/zookeys.658.10928

Wikipedia/ Citizendium:

<ref name="Miller2017ZooKeys">{{Citation
| author = Miller K
| title = A review of the Neotropical genus Bidessodes Régimbart, 1895 including description of four new species (Coleoptera, Adephaga, Dytiscidae, Hydroporinae, Bidessini)
| journal = ZooKeys
| year = 2017
| volume =
| issue = 658
| pages = 9--38
| pmid =
| publisher = Pensoft Publishers
| doi = 10.3897/zookeys.658.10928
| url = http://zookeys.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=10928
| pmc =
| accessdate = 2024-12-12

}} Versioned wiki page: 2017-02-22, version 136465, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Bidessodes&oldid=136465 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.</ref>

See also the citation download page at the journal.


Taxonavigation

Ordo: ORDO
Familia: FAMILIA

Name

Bidessodes Régimbart, 1895Wikispecies linkPensoft Profile

Diagnosis

Bidessodes are characterized by the following features: (1) a transverse occipital line is absent (e.g. Fig. 1), (2) the anterior clypeal margin is unmodified (Fig. 1), (3) the basal pronotal striae are present (Fig. 1), (4) the basal elytral stria is absent (Fig. 1), (5) the elytral sutural stria is absent (Fig. 1), and (6) the transverse carina across the epipleuron at the humeral angle of the elytron is absent. The genus most similar in general appearance to Bidessodes in Bidessini is Neobidessodes Hendrich and Balke, 2009, a group of species from Australia previously placed in Bidessodes. The main difference between these genera is a series of very fine serrations or denticles along the posterior margins of the abdominal ventrites, present in Bidessodes and absent in Neobidessodes.

Comments

The genera Hughbosdineus and Youngulus were proposed by Spangler (1981)[2] and relegated to subgenera of Bidessodes by Young (1986)[3]. It seems clear, though, that the species were placed in their own genera based on unusual apomorphies rather than clear evidence of phylogenetic isolation. Although there has not been a phylogenetic analysis of the group, these two species appear to be well within the general character-based concept of Bidessodes. There is little justification for continued recognition of three subgenera in Bidessodes, so, Hughbosdineus Spangler, 1981 and Youngulus Spangler, 1981 are each placed as junior synonyms of Bidessodes Régimbart, 1895 (new synonymies).

Key to species of Bidessodes

The following key is modified from Young (1986)[3] and Braga and Ferreira-Jr. (2009)[4]. Keys to Bidessodes have been historically based on male attributes. This key is similarly limited. Females of many species are extremely similar and cannot be easily distinguished without association with males. Much of the key requires dissection of male genitalia, and even with the key the best diagnostic method is to dissect male genitalia and compare with descriptions and images of them. Bidessodes fragilis is not keyed given ambiguity about its identity and character combination.

Taxon Treatment

  • Miller, K; 2017: A review of the Neotropical genus Bidessodes Régimbart, 1895 including description of four new species (Coleoptera, Adephaga, Dytiscidae, Hydroporinae, Bidessini) ZooKeys, (658): 9-38. doi

Images

Other References

  1. Nilsson A (2016) A World Catalogue of the Family Dytiscidae, or the Diving Beetles (Coleoptera, Adephaga). Version 1.I.2016. Distributed by the author, http://www2.emg.umu.se/projects/biginst/andersn/
  2. Spangler P (1981) Two new genera, two new species of bidessine water beetles from South America (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 57: 65–75.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Young F (1986) Review of the predaceous water beetles of the genus Bidessodes Régimbart (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Entomologica Basiliensia 11: 203–220.
  4. Braga R, Ferreira Jr N (2009) Three new species of Bidessodes Régimbart (Insecta, Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) from the Amazon river floodplain. Zootaxa 2034: 43–48.