Araneus strandiellus
| Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Marusik2012ZooKeys205, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Marusik2012ZooKeys205">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Araneae
Familia: Araneidae
Genus: Araneus
Name
Araneus strandiellus Charitonov, 1951 – Wikispecies link – Pensoft Profile
- Araneus strandiellus Charitonov 1951[1]: 210, f. 2a-b (♀).
- Araneus strandiellus: Pavlenko 1985[2]: 153; Marusik 1989[3]: 41; Marusik et al. 1990[4]: 17; Mikhailov 1997[5]: 116; Araneus strandiellus: Logunov et al. 1998[6]: 130; Marusik et al. 2000[7]: 13.
Material examined
Holotype ♀ (PSU), TAJIKISTAN, Varzob botanical Station, 30.07.1945 (V.V.Gussakovski) [ca 38°50'N, 68°50'E]. KAZAKHSTAN, Almaty Area: 1♂ 3♀ 1juv. (ZMMU), environs of Bakans Town, tugai and thicket, June 1986 (Ch.K. Tarabaev); 1♀ (AGA), Charyn River canyon, Sartogai Boundary, 12.06.1993 (S.V. Ovchinnikov). RUSSIA, Tuva: 1♂ 4♀ (IBPN), Tere-Khol’ Lake, Sharlaa Stand and around, 40°01.47'N, 95°03.45'E, 1150 m, 6–14.07.1996 (Yu.M.Marusik); 1♂ 1♀ (ISEA), Tere-Khol’ Lake, SE shore, Eder-Elezin Sands (Desert), 1150 m, 12.07.1993 (Yu.M. Marusik); 1♂ (ISEA), Tere-Khol’ Lake, S shore, sands with sparse Caragana shrubs, 6–26.05.1990 (O. Lyakhov).
Diagnosis
Habitus, pattern and copulatory organs of Araneus strandiellus resemble only those in Araneus pallasi. Both species have simple, weakly sclerotised epigyne with inflexible scapus; males lack stipes, subterminal apophysis, embolic cup, and have weakly sclerotised conductor; long filamentous embolus; long (as embolus), narrow terminal apophysis; median apophysis with one prolaterally directed process (Fig. 9–17) (much shorter non filamentous embolus, and median apophysis with two processes in majority of Araneus s.s., e. g. diadematus group (Levi 1971[8])) and males have unmodified tibia II. Araneus strandiellus can be distinguished from sibling Araneus pallasi by having dorsal abdominal humps, and triangular scapus with pocket (wide, round scapus in Araneus pallasi). Males of these two species can be separated from other Araneus species by the round base of embolus, absence of the hump on tegulum and having longer median apophysis (Fig. 12, 16) with a triangular process in Araneus strandiellus (Fig. 14), and claw-like in Araneus pallasi (Fig. 15).
Description
(specimens from Kazakhstan)
Male. Total length 3.0. Carapace 1.4 long, 1.3 wide. Length of patella + tibia I 2.15 (patella 0.7; tibia 1.45). Carapace pale brown, covered with pale hairs; indistinctly darker on margins and with elongate whitish median spot (Fig. 6). Cephalic area of carapace slightly protruding. Diameter of AME subequal to PME. Distance between PME 1.3 times longer than between AME. Basal part of chelicera and retrolateral side dark brown. Promargin of chelicera with 3 teeth, retromargin with 2 small teeth. Sternum brown, with wide light spot in the centre (Fig. 7). Dorsum of abdomen with pair of small humps (Fig. 6). Humps separated by less than one diameter. Abdomen dark brown, with two white transverse bands. Venter of abdomen with dark median band, and whitish lateral bands (Fig. 7). Legs with annulations. Tibia II unmodified, similar to tibia I. Femur I prolaterally with 4 strong and long spines (Figs 5, 8) and with 7 short strong retrolateral spines.
Palp as in Figs 9–14. Patella with 2 macrosetae. Tegulum enlarged and all sclerites (embolus, conductor, radix, terminal and median apophyses) partly hidden by tegulum and cymbium. Terminal apophysis (Ta) long, flat, semicircular and weakly sclerotised; it runs apically between cymbium and tegulum. The long, thin and well sclerotised filiform embolus (Em) follows a groove in the terminal apophysis. Radix (Ra) short, stipes absent. Conductor (Co) very small, weakly sclerotised; supports tip of embolus from below. Median apophysis (Ma) with relatively small, triangular process (Pm) directed prolaterally.
Female. Total length 2.75–4.0. Carapace 1.25–1.45 long, 1.2–1.4 wide. Length of patella + tibia I 1.9–2.15 (patella 0.6–0.7; tibia 1.3–1.5). Coloration and pattern of carapace as in male, but paler (Figs 1-3). Diameter of AME 1.3 times smaller than PME. Distance between PME 1.4 times longer than distance between AME. Cheliceral teeth as in male. Frontal part of chelicerae yellow, retrolateral side dark. White spot in the centre of sternum wider than in male.
Dorsum of abdomen with pair of conical humps separated by less than one diameter. Abdomen pale with dark pattern (Fig. 1). Venter of abdomen white between epigastric furrow and spinnerets; white area as wide as epigastric furrow (Fig. 2).
Femur I with 2–3 strong, long and pale spines (Figs 4). Legs yellow, with indistinct dark annulation. Ventral side of femur pale in almost all length. Patella pale with indistinct dark spot. Tibia and metatarsi without central dark rings or with small, dark spots.
Epigyne as in Figs 18–21, flat with weakly sclerotised inflexible triangular scapus (i.e. immovable merged with base of epigyne); tip of scapus with pocket (Sp); copulatory ducts and spermatheca slightly visible through cuticle. Base of epigyne always embedded in epigastric furrow, therefore posterior part visible only after its dissection or excavation.
Variations
Specimens from Tuva have darker coloration, lack white spot on carapace and sternum. Females from Tuva have no wide median band on the venter of abdomen. Importance of these differences is unclear to us.
Distribution
The species is known from the Aral Sea to eastern Tuva (Fig. 22) south to Tajikistan.
Comments
Generic affinity to Araneus,a genus comprising over 600 species (cf. Platnick 2012[9]), is debatable. In comparison to Araneus s. s., Araneus strandiellus has only 3 promarginal and 2 retromarginal teeth (4 promarginal and 3 retromarginal in Araneus s.s.); females do not have heavy sclerotised epigyne and flexible scapus; and males lack stipes, subterminal apophysis and cap on embolus, conductor is very small and weak sclerotised and median apophysis has only one process.
Judging from the general shape of epigyne (presence of inflexible scapus) and the male palpal configuration (shape of median and terminal apophysis, embolus) Araneus strandiellus and probably the closest relative Araneus pallasi mostly resemble Neoscona Simon, 1864 (one of the junior synonyms of Araneus pallasi was considered in Neoscona) or Agalenatea Archer, 1951. However unlike Araneus strandiellus and Araneus pallasi, males of both Agalenatea and Neoscona have stipes and subterminal apophysis, an anticlockwise course of embolus, legs with hook on coxa I and modified tibia II (more numerous and stronger spines than on other legs). Epigyne of these two related species are weakly sclerotised and embedded in epigastric furrow (posterior part visible only after its dissection or excavation), while in Agalenatea and Neoscona epigyne are not embedded and heavy sclerotised.
Taxon Treatment
- Marusik, Y; Šestáková, A; Omelko, M; 2012: First description of the male with redescription of the female of Araneus strandiellus Charitonov, 1951 (Araneae, Araneidae) ZooKeys, 205: 91-98. doi
Other References
- ↑ Charitonov D (1951) Spiders and harvestmen. In: Ravine Kondara. USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 209–216. [in Russian]
- ↑ Pavlenko T (1985) Spatial distribution of spiders in natural complexes of Barsakel’mes Island (Aral sea). In: Ovcharenko V (Ed). Fauna and ecology of spiders of USSR. Trudy Zoologicheskogo instituta, Leningrad 139: 147–155. [in Russian]
- ↑ Marusik Y (1989) New data on fauna and synonymy of spiders from USSR. In: Fauna and ecology of spiders and scorpions. Nauka Press, Moscow: 39–50. [In Russian]
- ↑ Marusik Y, Tarabayev C, Litovchenko A (1990) The catalogue of orbweaving spiders in Kazakhstan. Familia: Araneidae. Khabarly Kazakhstan SSR Academy of Sciences 4 (160): 14-23. [In Russian]
- ↑ Mikhailov K (1997) Catalogue of the spiders of the territories of the former Soviet Union (Arachnida, Aranei). Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University, Moscow, 416 pp.
- ↑ Logunov D, Marusik Y, Koponen S (1998) A check-list of the spiders in Tuva, South Siberia with analysis of their habitat distribution. Ber nat-med Verein Innsbruck 85: 125-159.
- ↑ Marusik Y, Logunov D, Koponen S (2000) Spiders of Tuva, south Siberia. Institute for Biological Problems of the North, Magadan, 253 pp.
- ↑ Levi H (1971) The diadematus group of the orb-weaver genus Araneus north of Mexico (Araneae: Araneidae). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 141: 131-179.
- ↑ Platnick N (2012) The world spider catalog, version 12.5. American Museum of Natural History, New York. http://research.amnh.org/iz/spiders/catalog/ [accessed 7 March 2012]
Images
|
