Troglobius ferroicus
Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Zeppelini2014SubterraneanBiology14, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Zeppelini2014Subterranean Biology14">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Entomobryomorpha
Familia: Paronellidae
Genus: Troglobius
Name
Troglobius ferroicus Zeppelini, Silva & Palacios-Vargas, 2014 sp. n. – Wikispecies link – ZooBank link – Pensoft Profile
Type locality
Brazil, Minas Gerais, Itabirito, Várzea do Lopes. Cave VL29/30, 20°20'05"S, 43°56'18"W. Aphotic zone on water film over the substrate and organic matter, 8 individuals collected.
Holotype. Slide mounted in Hoyer’s solution. Deposited at “Coleção de Referência de Fauna de Solo da Paraíba – Universidade Estadual da Paraíba” (CRFS/UEPB), #2766. Várzea do Lopes, Itabirito, MG, Brazil. Cave VL29/30. 02-06/x/2011. Leg. Speleology team of Carste consultants.
Paratypes. One paratype deposited at Laboratorio de Ecología y Sistemática de Microartrópodos - UNAM (slide #2837 donated from CRFS/UEPB). Várzea do Lopes, Itabitito, MG, Brazil. Cave VL 29/30. Andrade Col. 03-20/XI/2007.
One paratype deposited at Muzeu Nacional – Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - MN/UFRJ (slide #2765 donated from CRFS/UEPB) Várzea do Lopes, Itabitito, MG, Brazil. Cave VL 29/30. 03/IV/2012. Other two paratypes at CRFS/UEPB, under numbers #2838 and 3098, from the same locality as the holotype.
Description
Habitus of entomobryomorphs (Fig. 1). Length (n = 4) 2.3 mm in average (1.9-2.7 mm). Color pearly white. Body with smooth and ciliated chaetae of different sizes, oval scales hyaline, trichobothria long and ciliated.
Ratio head:antenna 1:2.5, ratio antenna:body length 1:1.9. Ant. I-II with scales. Ratio of Ant. I-IV as 1: 2.6; 2.5; 3.7. Apex of Ant. II with three candle-shaped sensilla, two close to each other and a third laterally displaced (Fig. 2). Apical sensory organ of Ant. III with two candle-shaped sensilla, apical guard chaetae thicker than others. Ant. IV undivided, with rows of chaetae and sensilla or finely ciliated microchaetae, without apical bulb.
Eyes and pigment absent, head with two pairs of trichobothria (Fig. 3A), chaetae Ps5 and Pa5 ciliated. Pre-labral and labral chaetae formula 4/5, 5,4; all chaetae smooth. Labial triangle with anterior row (A1-5) smooth. All labial triangle chaetae smooth, labial seta R well developed, L2 absent (Fig. 4).
Legs with ciliated setae. Coxa of leg I with one chaeta. Metatrochanteral organ with 21 chaetae forming a “V” and 13 additional short chaetae (Fig. 5). Tenent hairs acuminate, shorter than ventral lamella of unguis (Fig. 6-8); ratio unguis: tenent hair = 1: 0.65. All unguis with two inner basal winged teeth of different sizes; one median inner tooth and one very small tooth at the base of the outer lamella. All unguiculi with well-developed outer lamella and normal sized inner lamella (Figs 6–8).
Abd II with two trichobothria, Abd III-IV with three trichobothria each; Abd. IV with 4+4 lenticular organs on posterior margin (Fig. 9). Posterior surface of ventral tube with 2 long macrochaetae, scales on proximal end, 10 proximal pairs of ciliated chaetae and 11 distal pairs of small smooth chaetae; anterior face with only 2 pairs of ciliated macrochaeta (Fig. 10).
Furcula with scales and ciliated chaetae; mucro, dens and manubrium ratio 1.0:3.8;4.2. The distal end of dens with a pair of large scales, about the same size of mucro (Fig. 11). Dens without spines, normal scales on anterior side, internal row of posterior face with 21 fringed scales (Fig. 12A), median row with one fringed scale (Fig. 13A). Other rows with finely ciliated chaetae in irregular pattern. Mucro elongated, bearing 10–15 teeth on outer lamella, inner lamella smooth with one tooth at the tip.
Etymology
The name of the new species Troglobius ferroicus sp. n. comes from Latin ferrum (iron) and Greek oikos (house). This makes allusion to the iron caves where the new species was found.
Distribution
Good’s biogeographic zone 27, northeastern and central Brazil (Good 1974[1], Culik and Zeppelini 2003[2]). The climate is defined by dry winters and wet summers, with average temperatures of 18 °C during winter and 22 °C in summer.
Habitat
Troglobius ferroicus sp. n. is found in small (less than 100 m deep) iron-caves, dwelling on water film over the rocks and organic debris in the aphotic zone. The species was found in a single cave, and it is likely to be a troglobite which lives in the in the Mesovoid Shallow Substratum (MSS) (Juberthie et al. 1980[3]) and the adjacent cave.
Conservation status
This cave is placed in a mining area with iron ores, which represents a putative threat to the species if the cave and surrounding environments, including the MSS, are not preserved. The species was included in the recent evaluation of the Brazilian Fauna Red List, and must be published in the next issue of the Brazilian Red List as Critically endangered (CR).
Remarks
Troglobius ferroicus sp. n. is the largest species in the genus, adults are 2.3 mm long in average (2-2.8 mm), while other species are about 1.5 mm long (Table 1). It has the longest antennae and ratio of head:antennae (Table 1). Ungual internal unpaired teeth are lacking in Troglobius coprophagus, there are two teeth in Troglobius brasiliensis and a single tooth in Troglobius ferroicus sp. n. Mucronal serration is different in Troglobius brasiliensis, where both edges are serrated, in Troglobius coprophagus and Troglobius ferroicus sp. n. the inner edge is smooth. One important diagnostic feature to differentiate the species is the relative size of mucro and dens, the ratio mucro/dens in Troglobius ferroicus sp. n. is 1:4.0, in Troglobius brasiliensis is 1:3.0 and Troglobius coprophagus 1:2.5. Number and shape of the dental scales can, also, easily differentiate the species (Figs 12–13). Chaeta m2 on Abd. I is lacking in Troglobius ferroicus sp. n., and present in the other two species, and chaeta T1 on Abd. IV is present in Troglobius ferroicus sp. n., but absent in the other two species.
Size | Ratio head/Ant | Ratio body/Ant | Ratio Ant segments | Ungual teeth | Ratio mucro/dens;man | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Troglobius brasiliensis | 1.5 | 1:1.8 | 1:1.7 | 1:2.5; 2.5; 3.0 | 2 | 1:3.5;4.2 |
Troglobius coprophagus | 1.4 | 1:1.7 | 1:2.3 | 1:1.2; 5.6; 13.1 | 0 | 1:3.4;5.7 |
Troglobius ferroicus sp.n. | colspan="1" rowspan="1" | 2.3 | 1:2.5 | 1:1.9 | 1:2.6; 2.5; 3.7 | 1 | 1:3.8;4.2 |
Original Description
- Zeppelini, D; Silva, D; Palacios-Vargas, J; 2014: A new species of Troglobius (Collembola, Paronellidae, Cyphoderinae) from a Brazilian iron cave Subterranean Biology, 14: 1-14. doi
Images
|
Other References
- ↑ Good R (1974) The geography of flowering plants 4th ed. Longman Group, London, 574 pp.
- ↑ Culik M, Zeppelini D (2003) Diversity and distribution of Collembola: Arthropoda: Hexapoda) of Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 1119-1143. doi: 10.1023/A:1023069912619
- ↑ Juberthie C, Delay B, Bouillon M (1980) Sur l’existence du milieu souterrain superficiel en zone non calcaire. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de la France D, 290: 49-52.