Crassignatha nasalis

From Species-ID
Revision as of 19:30, 6 November 2020 by ZooKeys (Talk | contribs) (1 revision imported)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Notice: This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.

If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly.

This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Li Y, Lin Y, Li S (2020) A review of Crassignatha (Araneae, Symphytognathidae). ZooKeys 988 : 63–128, doi. Versioned wiki page: 2020-11-06, version 187042, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Crassignatha_nasalis&oldid=187042 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.

Citation formats to copy and paste

BibTeX:

@article{Li2020ZooKeys988,
author = {Li, Ya AND Lin, Yucheng AND Li, Shuqiang},
journal = {ZooKeys},
publisher = {Pensoft Publishers},
title = {A review of Crassignatha (Araneae, Symphytognathidae)},
year = {2020},
volume = {988},
issue = {},
pages = {63--128},
doi = {10.3897/zookeys.988.56188},
url = {https://zookeys.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=56188},
note = {Versioned wiki page: 2020-11-06, version 187042, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Crassignatha_nasalis&oldid=187042 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.}

}

RIS/ Endnote:

TY - JOUR
T1 - A review of Crassignatha (Araneae, Symphytognathidae)
A1 - Li Y
A1 - Lin Y
A1 - Li S
Y1 - 2020
JF - ZooKeys
JA -
VL - 988
IS -
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.988.56188
SP - 63
EP - 128
PB - Pensoft Publishers
M1 - Versioned wiki page: 2020-11-06, version 187042, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Crassignatha_nasalis&oldid=187042 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.

M3 - doi:10.3897/zookeys.988.56188

Wikipedia/ Citizendium:

<ref name="Li2020ZooKeys988">{{Citation
| author = Li Y, Lin Y, Li S
| title = A review of Crassignatha (Araneae, Symphytognathidae)
| journal = ZooKeys
| year = 2020
| volume = 988
| issue =
| pages = 63--128
| pmid =
| publisher = Pensoft Publishers
| doi = 10.3897/zookeys.988.56188
| url = https://zookeys.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=56188
| pmc =
| accessdate = 2024-12-23

}} Versioned wiki page: 2020-11-06, version 187042, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Crassignatha_nasalis&oldid=187042 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.</ref>

See also the citation download page at the journal.


Taxonavigation

Ordo: Araneae
Familia: Symphytognathidae
Genus: Crassignatha

Name

Crassignatha nasalis Y. Lin & S. Li sp. nov.Wikispecies linkZooBank linkPensoft Profile

Type material

Holotype ♂ (NHMSU Ar 026) and paratypes 9♀ (NHMSU Ar 027–035), China: Sichuan Province, Luzhou City, Gulin County, Yuhua Township, Taoyuan Cave (27.98293°N, 105.99833°E; 910 m), 21.IV.2014, Y. Lin, H. Zhao, and Y. Li leg. 1♂ (NHMSU-HA041) and 1♀ (NHMSU-HA041) used for sequencing, GenBank: MT991992 and MT991991, same data as for preceding.

Diagnosis

The male of C. nasalis sp. nov. is similar to that of C. rostriformis sp. nov. but can be distinguished by the sharp hook of the median apophysis and a straight cymbial tooth vs. a blunt hook of the median apophysis and a hook-like cymbial tooth (Figs 17A, B, 25A, B). The female is similar to C. quanqu in epigyne shape but differs from the latter by the indistinct scape and the copulatory ducts nearly forming a closed rhombic area at center of vulva vs. obvious scape and copulatory ducts not forming a closed area at center of vulva (Fig. 17E, F vs. Fig. 23D, E).

Description

Male (holotype). Total length 0.80. Carapace 0.40 long, 0.32 wide, 0.44 high. Clypeus 0.12 high. Sternum 0.24 long, 0.20 wide. Abdomen 0.52 long, 0.44 wide, 0.56 high. Length of legs: I 1.10 (0.30, 0.14, 0.30, 0.16, 0.20); II 0.92 (0.24, 0.12, 0.24, 0.14, 0.18); III 0.72 (0.20, 0.10, 0.14, 0.10, 0.18); IV 0.82 (0.22, 0.10, 0.20, 0.12, 0.18).
Somatic characters (Fig. 16A–C). Coloration: carapace, sternum, chelicerae, endites, and labium brown. Legs yellow-brown. Abdomen pale gray, ventrally darker than dorsally, with sclerotized dots and sparse setae; posterolateral scutum light brown. Prosoma: carapace nearly rounded, thoracic center smooth, cephalic area and margins granulated and pitted, with two strong setae medially. Cephalic area strongly elevated. ALE protruded, PER strongly recurved. Clypeus concave. Chelicerae covered with setae anteriorly. Sternum almost heart shaped, slightly plump, truncated posteriorly, surface rough. Legs: tibia II with two large clasping spurs. Abdomen: sub-rounded dorsally. Spinnerets weakly sclerotized, with a circular plate.
Palp (Fig. 17A–C): pale, weakly sclerotized. Cymbium with a few setae apically, cymbial tooth spur-like, located at distal terminus. Tegulum globose, smooth. Plate-like median apophysis with a spike-shaped distal process. Embolic membrane arises behind the median apophysis. Embolus short, rigid, basally constricted and mesally widened, distally forming an inverted Z-shape. Female (one of paratypes). Total length 1.00. Carapace 0.40 long, 0.36 wide, 0.40 high. Clypeus 0.16 high. Sternum 0.24 long, 0.24 wide. Abdomen 0.68 long, 0.68 wide, 0.76 high. Length of legs: I 1.40 (0.46, 0.16, 0.32, 0.20, 0.26); II 1.18 (0.36, 0.14, 0.26, 0.18, 0.24); III 0.82 (0.20, 0.12, 0.16, 0.14, 0.20); IV 1.04 (0.30, 0.14, 0.24, 0.16, 0.20).
Somatic characters (Fig. 16D–F). Coloration: prosoma and legs as in male. Abdomen dark, with tiny light yellow dots. Prosoma: carapace nearly pear shaped, ocular arrangement and modification as in male. Cephalic area lower than in male. PER straight. Mouthparts and sternum as in male. Abdomen: globular dorsally. Spinnerets weakly sclerotized.
Epigyne (Fig. 17D–F): epigynal area distinctly sclerotized, with a few setae. Scape short, strongly sclerotized. Copulatory openings separated, resembling a pig snout. Vulva visible via translucent tegument. Paired spermathecae separated by less than ½ their diameter. Fertilization ducts originate inside posterior edge of spermathecae, curving toward center of spermathecae. Copulatory ducts connected to dorsal center surface of spermathecae, twisting 3 ×, then forming a nearly closed rhombic area in center of vulva.

Etymology

The specific epithet is a Latin adjective (= nasal) and refers to the shape of the copulatory openings of the epigyne.

Distribution

China (Sichuan) (Fig. 38).

Original Description

  • Li, Y; Lin, Y; Li, S; 2020: A review of Crassignatha (Araneae, Symphytognathidae) ZooKeys, 988: 63-128. doi

Images