Tradescantia subg. Austrotradescantia

From Species-ID
Revision as of 08:52, 26 October 2017 by PhytoKeys (Talk | contribs) (1 revision imported)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Notice: This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.

If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly.

This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Pellegrini M (2017) Morphological phylogeny of Tradescantia L. (Commelinaceae) sheds light on a new infrageneric classification for the genus and novelties on the systematics of subtribe Tradescantiinae. PhytoKeys (89) : 11–72, doi. Versioned wiki page: 2017-10-26, version 162891, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Tradescantia_subg._Austrotradescantia&oldid=162891 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.

Citation formats to copy and paste

BibTeX:

@article{Pellegrini2017PhytoKeys,
author = {Pellegrini, Marco O. O.},
journal = {PhytoKeys},
publisher = {Pensoft Publishers},
title = {Morphological phylogeny of Tradescantia L. (Commelinaceae) sheds light on a new infrageneric classification for the genus and novelties on the systematics of subtribe Tradescantiinae},
year = {2017},
volume = {},
issue = {89},
pages = {11--72},
doi = {10.3897/phytokeys.89.20388},
url = {https://phytokeys.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=20388},
note = {Versioned wiki page: 2017-10-26, version 162891, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Tradescantia_subg._Austrotradescantia&oldid=162891 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.}

}

RIS/ Endnote:

TY - JOUR
T1 - Morphological phylogeny of Tradescantia L. (Commelinaceae) sheds light on a new infrageneric classification for the genus and novelties on the systematics of subtribe Tradescantiinae
A1 - Pellegrini M
Y1 - 2017
JF - PhytoKeys
JA -
VL -
IS - 89
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.89.20388
SP - 11
EP - 72
PB - Pensoft Publishers
M1 - Versioned wiki page: 2017-10-26, version 162891, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Tradescantia_subg._Austrotradescantia&oldid=162891 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.

M3 - doi:10.3897/phytokeys.89.20388

Wikipedia/ Citizendium:

<ref name="Pellegrini2017PhytoKeys">{{Citation
| author = Pellegrini M
| title = Morphological phylogeny of Tradescantia L. (Commelinaceae) sheds light on a new infrageneric classification for the genus and novelties on the systematics of subtribe Tradescantiinae
| journal = PhytoKeys
| year = 2017
| volume =
| issue = 89
| pages = 11--72
| pmid =
| publisher = Pensoft Publishers
| doi = 10.3897/phytokeys.89.20388
| url = https://phytokeys.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=20388
| pmc =
| accessdate = 2024-12-23

}} Versioned wiki page: 2017-10-26, version 162891, https://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Tradescantia_subg._Austrotradescantia&oldid=162891 , contributors (alphabetical order): Pensoft Publishers.</ref>

See also the citation download page at the journal.


Taxonavigation

Ordo: Commelinales
Familia: Commelinaceae

Name

Tradescantia (D.R.Hunt) M.Pell., comb. et stat. nov.Wikispecies linkPensoft Profile

Description

Herbs chamaephytes, base definite or indefinite, perennial, frequently succulent, terrestrial, rupicolous or epiphytes. Roots thin, fibrous. Stems prostrate with ascending apex or erect, herbaceous to succulent, rarely fibrous, little to densely branched, rooting at the basal nodes or at the distal ones when they touch the substrate. Leaves sessile to subpetiolate; distichously or spirally-alternate, evenly distributed along the stem, rarely congested in a rosette; sheaths closed; blades flat to falcate and/or complicate, base asymmetrical, midvein conspicuous, rarely inconspicuous, adaxially impressed, abaxially prominent, rounded, secondary veins conspicuous or inconspicuous. Synflorescences terminal or axillary in the distal portion of the stems, composed of a solitary main florescence, 1–4 per leaf axis. Inflorescences (main florescences) consisting of a pedunculate double-cincinni fused back to back; inflorescence bract hyaline, tubular, inconspicuous; peduncle bracts absent; supernumerary bracts rarely present; cincinni bracts leaf-like, rarely spathaceous, differing from the leaves mostly only in size, similar to unequal to each other, saccate or not, free from each other; bracteoles inconspicuous, imbricate, linear-triangular to triangular, hyaline. Flowers bisexual, actinomorphic, flat (not forming a floral tube); pedicel gibbous at apex, upright at anthesis and pre-anthesis, deflexed at post-anthesis; sepals equal, free, chartaceous, ovate, dorsally keeled or not, apex acute; petals sessile, equal, free, elliptic to ovate to broadly ovate, flat or plicate, base cuneate to obtuse, margin entire, apex acute; stamens 6, arranged in two series, equal, filaments free from the petals, straight at anthesis and post-anthesis, basally densely bearded with moniliform hairs, hairs as long as the stamens, white, anthers with connective rhomboid, yellow, anther sacs ellipsoid, yellow, pollen yellow; ovary white, glabrous, locules 2-ovulate, style straight at anthesis and post-anthesis, white, obconical at base, conical at the apex, stigma punctate, pistil longer than or the same length as the stamens. Capsules subglobose to globose, light to medium brown when mature, glabrous, loculicidal, 3-valved, sometimes apiculate due to persistent style base. Seeds 1–2 per locule, ellipsoid to narrowly trigonal, ventrally flattened, cleft or not towards the embryotega, testa costate to rugose with ridges radiating from the embryotega, embryotega dorsal, relatively inconspicuous, without a prominent apicule.

Habitat, distribution and ecology

As stated by Hunt (1980)[1], T. subg. Austrotradescantia is the only exclusively South American group in the genus, occurring in Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay and Argentina (Fig. 8). Its species can be found growing understory in moist and shady forests in the Atlantic Forest domain, open fields, rocky outcrops, and are especially common in disturbed areas.

Included species

The subgenera is composed by ca. 15 species, namely: Tradescantia cerinthoides Kunth, T. chrysophylla M.Pell., T. crassula Link & Otto, T. cymbispatha C.B.Clarke, T. fluminensis Vell., T. mundula Kunth, T. seubertiana M.Pell., T. tenella Kunth, T. umbraculifera Hand.-Mazz., and T. valida G.Brückn. Accepted names and total of accepted species for T. subg. Austrotradescantia will be separately dealt in the taxonomic revision for the group, including the formal description of two new species.

Comments

Tradescantia subg. Austrotradescantia can be easily recognized by its generally distichously-alternate leaves (a character uncommon for the genus; Fig. 9A & B), sepals elliptic to broadly elliptic, all keeled (Fig. 9G); filaments basally, densely bearded with long moniliform hairs (Fig. 9E); style obconic at base and conic at apex, stigma punctate with type D papillae (Owens and Kimmins 1981[2]; Fig. 9K); seeds with costate testa, and relatively inconspicuous embryotega (Fig. 9L). Added to these morphological characters, the small bimodal and numerous chromosomes (n= 10–numerous), and a unique chemical profile, set this group apart from the other four subgenera. A complete taxonomical revision of this subgenus is in the works by me (Pellegrini 2015[3], in prep), and should provide the necessary tools for proper species identification and name application in the group. Regarding taxonomically informative characters, leaf morphology can easily differentiate the two observed morphological groups. The presence of a definite and indefinite base is also helpful and probably connected to the understory habit of many species. Aside from that, cincinni bracts are extremely useful for species delimitation. They can be either saccate or not at base (see below), leaf-like or spathaceous (e.g. T. umbraculifera and T. valida), and the symmetry between both cincinni bracts is also very useful in differentiating some closely related species. Furthermore, T. valida is the only species in T. subg. Austrotradescantia to possess supernumerary bracts. Two morphological groups can be clearly observed in T. subg. Austrotradescantia, being also recovered in the present study (Figs 3, 4). The T. fluminensis group is composed by more delicate plants, with prostrate stems ascending at the apex, cincinni bracts saccate at base, and generally white petals. A marking exception is the T. tenella complex, which possess erect stems, flowers that range from white to pink, seeds with rugose testa, and hilum always shorter than ½ the length of the seeds. Nonetheless, its species generally possess subpetiolate, membranous to chartaceous leaves, and conspicuous mid and secondary veins, which are characters common to the T. fluminensis group (Figs 3, 4). Since the leaves vary from membranous to chartaceous to slightly fleshy, venation pattern is very useful for species differentiation inside this clade. Both T. fluminensis and T. mundula possess leaves with adaxially impressed secondary veins, while T. cymbispatha and T. chrysophylla possess inconspicuously impressed secondary veins. The species in this group occur almost exclusively in Tropical and Subtropical Rainforests, but are also commonly found growing as weedy plants throughout their distribution range.
The T. crassula group is composed by succulent plants (which generally grow in open areas), with erect stems, cincinni bracts not saccate at base, petals ranging from white to pink to lilac, and seeds cleft towards the embryotega. The leaves from these species are sessile and extremely succulent, with only the midvein conspicuous, and secondary veins rarely conspicuous in T. crassula. Nonetheless, in some individuals of T. crassula, T. seubertiana and T. valida, the leaves are so succulent that even the midvein is adaxially inconspicuous. Great petal color variation can be found within the same population, under the same ecological conditions, and is probably genetically controlled. These species are intimately related to the two southern biomes of South America, characterized by open and/or drier vegetation formations: the Chaco (which is part of the Dry Diagonal) and the Pampa. The species from the T. crassula group are morphologically very similar due to many overlapping morphological characters, and indumenta type and pattern are the most useful characters for separating these species. For the same reason, all species were recovered within a polytomy in the strict consensus (Fig. 3). In addition, T. cerinthoides and T. crassula (the two lowland species) possess a rather wide distribution range which overlaps with the narrowly distributed T. seubertiana and T. valida (both of them restricted to high elevation sites). Much vegetative variation is recorded for the two widely distributed species, but reproductive characters are key in differentiating species in this group (Pellegrini et al. 2017[4]). Thus, I suggest the T. crassula group to be targeted for phylogeographic and reproductive studies to improve and deepen the understanding of taxonomic boundaries between these taxa.

Taxon Treatment

  • Pellegrini, M; 2017: Morphological phylogeny of Tradescantia L. (Commelinaceae) sheds light on a new infrageneric classification for the genus and novelties on the systematics of subtribe Tradescantiinae PhytoKeys, (89): 11-72. doi

Images

Other References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Hunt D (1980) Sections and series in Tradescantia. In: American Commelinaceae, vol. IX. Kew Bull. 35(2): 437–422. https://doi.org/10.2307/4114596
  2. Owens S, Kimmins F (1981) Stigma morphology in Commelinaceae. Annals of Botany 47(6): 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086076
  3. Pellegrini M (2015) Filogenia e revisão taxonômica de Tradescantia L. sect. Austrotradescantia D.R.Hunt (Commelinaceae). MSc thesis, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  4. Pellegrini M, Forzza R, Sakuragui C (2017) Novelties in Brazilian Tradescantia L. (Commelinaceae). PhytoKeys 80: 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.80.12232
  5. Hunt D (1975) The reunion of Setcreasea and Separotheca with Tradescantia. In: American Commelinaceae, Vol. I. Kew Bull. 30(3): 443–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/4103068
  6. Hunt D (1986b) Campelia, Rhoeo and Zebrina united with Tradescantia. In: American Commelinaceae, vol. XIII. Kew Bull. 41(2): 401–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/4102948
  7. Hertweck K, Pires J (2014) Systematics and evolution of inflorescence structure in the Tradescantia alliance (Commelinaceae). Systematic Botany 39(1): 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364414X677991