Difference between revisions of "Oreophryne gagneorum"
m (Imported from ZooKeys) |
m (1 revision) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 13:09, 20 September 2013
| Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Kraus2013ZooKeys333, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Kraus2013ZooKeys333">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Anura
Familia: Microhylidae
Genus: Oreophryne
Name
Oreophryne gagneorum Kraus, 2013 sp. n. – Wikispecies link – ZooBank link – Pensoft Profile
Holotype
BPBM 20542 (field tag FK 10121), adult female, collected by F. Kraus and local villagers on S slope of Mt. Rossel, 11.3555°S, 154.2246°E, 720 m, Rossel Island, Milne Bay Province, Papua New Guinea, 5 May 2004.
Paratypes
(n = 52). Same data as holotype (BPBM 20538–41, 20543–57, PNGNM 24153–55); same data as holotype, except collected 3 May (BPBM 20531–37), 6 May (BPBM 20558–60, PNGNM 24156–60), 7 May (BPBM 20561–69), 8 May (BPBM 20570), 9 May (BPBM 20571), and 10 May (BPBM 20572) 2004; halfway between 11.3354°S, 154.2223°E and 11.3354°S, 154.2247°E, 275–280 m (BPBM 43075, PNGNM 24161).
Diagnosis
Oreophryne gagneorum can be distinguished from all congeners by its unique combination of small size (adult male SV = 16.3–20.0 mm, adult female SV = 19.0–23.5 mm); cartilaginous connection between the scapula and procoracoid; well-webbed toes; third and fifth toes subequal in length; steeply oblique lores; leg moderately long (TL/SV = 0.46–0.59); snout typically longer than broad (EN/IN = 1.00–1.33, EN/SV = 0.093–0.121, IN/SV = 0.080–0.109); head relatively broad (HW/SV = 0.36–0.43, HL/HW = 0.82–0.92); tympanum small (TY/SV = 0.034–0.051); finger and toe discs relatively broad (3rdF/SV = 0.063–0.086, 4thT/SV = 0.048–0.066, 3rdF/4thT = 1.18–1.47); shanks either unicolor or flecked/mottled with dark brown; pale-tan iris suffused or veined with black; and call a rapid series of short notes (23–190 ms) delivered at a rate of 9.57–11.32 notes/s with a dominant frequency of 3070–3510 Hz.
Comparisons with other species
The new species differs from all other Papuan Oreophryne except Oreophryne crucifer and Oreophryne kampeni in its unique combination of having a cartilaginous connection between the scapula and procoracoid and having well-webbed toes. Oreophryne gagneorum differs from Oreophryne crucifer in its longer leg (TL/SV = 0.46–0.59 vs. 0.45 in Oreophryne crucifer), longer snout (EN/SV = 0.093–0.121 vs. 0.092 in Oreophryne crucifer), shorter head (HL/HW = 0.82–0.92 vs. 0.78 in Oreophryne crucifer), smaller tympanum (TY/SV = 0.034–0.051 vs. 0.054 in Oreophryne crucifer), relatively wider finger discs (3rdF/4thT = 1.18–1.47 vs. 1.13 in Oreophryne crucifer), fourth finger longer than the second (second longer than fourth in Oreophryne crucifer), and absence of a golden-yellow bar between the eyes. It differs from Oreophryne kampeni in having the third and fifth toes subequal in length (third distinctly longer in Oreophryne kampeni), more oblique loreal region (lores almost vertical in Oreophryne kampeni), usually longer leg (TL/SV = 0.46–0.59 vs. 0.44–0.47 in Oreophryne kampeni) and longer snout (EN/IN = 1.00–1.33 vs. 0.094–1.05 in Oreophryne kampeni), larger toe discs (4thT/SV = 0.048–0.066 vs. 0.042–0.048 in Oreophryne kampeni), and the shanks without brown spots (shanks conspicuously patterned with round dark-brown spots in Oreophryne kampeni).
Oreophryne cameroni, Oreophryne idenburghensis, Oreophryne oviprotector, and Oreophryne waira also have a cartilaginous connection between the scapula and procoracoid and webbing between the toes, but they differ from Oreophryne gagneorum in having basal instead of extensive toe webbing. Furthermore, Oreophryne cameroni has the fifth toe distinctly longer than the third, a shorter snout (EN/IN = 0.94–0.95 vs. 1.00–1.3 in Oreophryne gagneorum), dark-brown iris, and call consisting of more slowly delivered notes (2.64–2.75 notes/s vs. 9.57–11.32 notes/s in Oreophryne gagneorum) of lower dominant frequeny (2870–2940 Hz vs. 3070–3510 Hz in Oreophryne gagneorum). Oreophryne idenburghensis is a much larger species (SV = 43–47 mm vs. 16.3–23.5 mm in Oreophryne gagneorum), with the fifth toe distinctly longer than the third, and with a broader snout (EN/IN = 0.087–0.091 vs. 1.00–1.33 in Oreophryne gagneorum); Oreophryne oviprotector has the fifth toe distinctly longer than the third, is lime green dorsally with a green bar between the eyes and a white ring around the orbit, and has a rattle call; and Oreophryne waira is a slightly smaller species (SV = 17.8–21.0 mm vs. 16.3–23.5 mm in Oreophryne gagneorum) with a rattle call (vs. a high-pitched whinny in Oreophryne gagneorum) and a shorter snout (EN/IN = 0.094–0.105 vs. 1.00–1.33 in Oreophryne gagneorum). All other Papuan Oreophryne have either a ligamentous connection between the scapula and procoracoid, lack toe webbing entirely, or both.
Description of holotype
An adult female with an incision on right side and left pectoral region dissected. Procoracoid connected to the scapula by a narrow cartilaginous rod. Head wide (HW/SV = 0.40), with steeply oblique loreal region; upper lip inflated. Canthus rostralis rounded, straight when viewed from above (Fig. 6A). Nostrils directed laterally, much closer to tip of snout than to eyes. Internarial distance slightly wider than distance from naris to eye (EN/IN = 1.25, IN/SV = 0.085, EN/SV = 0.106). Snout truncate when viewed from the side (Fig. 6B), shallowly angulate when viewed from above (Fig. 6A). Eyes moderately large (EY/SV = 0.14); eyelid approximately two-thirds width of interorbital distance. Tympanum small (TY/SV = 0.034), but with a distinct annulus, partly covered by skin posterodorsally. Weak supratympanic fold present; another weak fold extends posteroventrally from rear margin of tympanum. Skin smooth above and below, except abdomen granular. Fingers unwebbed, bearing discs with terminal grooves; relative lengths 3>4>2>1 (Fig. 6C). Finger discs approximately twice width of penultimate phalanges except for F1, which is approximately 1.5 times as wide as penultimate phalanx (3rdF/SV = 0.074). Subarticular tubercles low but distinct; inner metacarpal tubercle a large, low oval; outer a low circle. Toes well webbed, formula I 2–2 II 2.7–3.6 III 3–4.5 IV 4.7–3.6 V; bearing discs with terminal grooves; relative lengths 4>5=3>2>1 (Fig. 6D). Toe discs smaller than those of fingers (4thT/SV = 0.060, 3rdF/4thT = 1.24), approximately 1.5 times width of penultimate phalanges. Subarticular tubercles low but distinct; inner metatarsal tubercle a narrow oval; outer not apparent. Hind legs rather long (TL/SV = 0.49). In preservative, dorsum pale tan minutely speckled with brown, with a narrow, partially obscured tan vertebral line; limbs, including rear of thighs, same color as dorsum. Pale patch of lighter tan extends between eyes, narrowly margined posteriorly by dark brown. Short pale-cream dash extends from behind eye, through tympanum, to end near forearm insertion; this is bordered above and below by small, diffuse fields of brown. Lateral and ventrolateral surfaces suffused with pale cream. Venter pale straw yellow minutely stippled with brown, this more concentrated on chin and throat, somewhat sparser posteriorly; under limbs, hands, and feet stippled likewise. Sparse brown canthal stripe and subocular blotch present. Iris pale tan veined with black, which is especially concentrated in a horizontal plane before and behind the pupil.
Measurements of holotype (in mm).—SV = 23.5, TL = 11.6, HW = 9.5, HL = 8.3, IN = 2.0, EN = 2.5, SN = 3.5, EY = 3.2, TY = 0.8, 3rdF = 1.73, 4thT = 1.40, mass = 1.20 g.
Variation
The only apparent sexual dimorphism in this species is in size; females are larger than males in both mass and SV (Table 4). Otherwise, standard deviation of variables largely accords with the size of the mensural character, and variation across most variables is tight (Table 4). The snout shape varies from truncate to slightly rounded in lateral view and from shallowly angulate to slightly rounded in dorsal view. The tympanum is usually partially embedded in the surrounding skin, giving the impression that it sits in a depression. Webbing between the toes is always well developed, as in the holotype, and never merely basal. In life, animals have obvious scattered tubercles (Fig. 2E, F), but these become obscure in preservative.
| Character | Males (n = 35) | Females (n = 14) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mean | SD | range | mean | SD | range | |
| mass | 0.61 | 0.0168 | 0.40–0.85 | 0.86 | 0.0412 | 0.65–1.20 |
| SV | 18.5 | 0.1790 | 16.3–20.0 | 20.5 | 0.3410 | 19.0–23.5 |
| TL | 9.5 | 0.0754 | 8.5–10.5 | 10.6 | 0.1626 | 9.9–11.7 |
| EN | 2.0 | 0.0189 | 1.8–2.2 | 2.2 | 0.0359 | 2.0–2.5 |
| IN | 1.8 | 0.0185 | 1.5–1.9 | 1.9 | 0.0277 | 1.8–2.1 |
| SN | 2.9 | 0.0234 | 2.5–3.2 | 3.2 | 0.0633 | 2.8–3.5 |
| TY | 0.8 | 0.0134 | 0.6–0.9 | 0.9 | 0.0334 | 0.7–1.1 |
| EY | 2.6 | 0.0346 | 2.2–3.0 | 2.8 | 0.0518 | 2.5–3.2 |
| HW | 7.4 | 0.0825 | 6.5–8.2 | 8.2 | 0.1482 | 7.6–9.5 |
| HL | 6.5 | 0.0577 | 5.8–7.1 | 7.3 | 0.1475 | 6.6–8.3 |
| 3rdF | 1.34 | 0.0187 | 1.13–1.56 | 1.52 | 0.0479 | 1.26–1.84 |
| 4thT | 1.03 | 0.0146 | 0.86–1.23 | 1.15 | 0.0364 | 0.94–1.41 |
| TL/SV | 0.51 | 0.0049 | 0.46–0.59 | 0.52 | 0.0044 | 0.49–0.54 |
| EN/SV | 0.106 | 0.0008 | 0.093–0.117 | 0.105 | 0.0009 | 0.097–0.111 |
| IN/SV | 0.095 | 0.0009 | 0.80–0.104 | 0.093 | 0.0010 | 0.085–0.098 |
| SN/SV | 0.16 | 0.0013 | 0.14–0.17 | 0.15 | 0.0019 | 0.14–0.17 |
| TY/SV | 0.042 | 0.0007 | 0.035–0.051 | 0.043 | 0.0015 | 0.034–0.051 |
| EY/SV | 0.14 | 0.0013 | 0.12–0.16 | 0.14 | 0.0016 | 0.13–0.15 |
| HW/SV | 0.40 | 0.0026 | 0.36–0.43 | 0.40 | 0.0022 | 0.38–0.41 |
| HL/SV | 0.35 | 0.0018 | 0.32–0.37 | 0.36 | 0.0023 | 0.35–0.37 |
| 3rdF/SV | 0.072 | 0.0007 | 0.065–0.082 | 0.074 | 0.0016 | 0.063–0.086 |
| 4thT/SV | 0.055 | 0.0007 | 0.049–0.065 | 0.056 | 0.0011 | 0.048–0.066 |
| EN/IN | 1.12 | 0.0129 | 1.00–1.33 | 1.13 | 0.0162 | 1.00–1.25 |
| 3rdF/4thT | 1.31 | 0.0122 | 1.18–1.47 | 1.33 | 0.0200 | 1.20–1.43 |
| HL/HW | 0.87 | 0.0044 | 0.82–0.92 | 0.89 | 0.0056 | 0.85–0.91 |
Color in life
Field notes for BPBM 20531 in life recorded the color as: “Dorsum brown with darker brown mottling and tan stripe laterally, below which is dark brown. Iris tan. Tan postocular stripe. Venter pale gray stippled with dark gray. Rear of thighs dark brown.” BPBM 20532 was dark tan dorsally with a few dark-brown spots; the rear of thighs were the same as the dorsum. BPBM 20533 was also brown dorsally with vague brown markings, a pale tan postocular stripe, and a small amount of yellow in the groin. The rear of the thighs were brown with a few light-gray stipples. Chin to chest was dark gray with light-gray flecks, and the abdomen and undersides of the legs were light gray heavily flecked with dark gray. BPBM 20534 had a tan vertebral stripe and a dusky red patch in groin and front and rear of thighs. BPBM 20535 was chocolate brown dorsally with a cream postocular stripe, yellow in the inguinal region, and dusky brick red in groin and hidden surfaces of thighs. The holotype was pale tan-gray in life with a few, scattered red-brown spots (Fig. 2E); BPBM 20544 was dark brown with an orangish hourglass-shaped figure mid-dorsally, white-tipped tubercles, tan inter-ocular bar, and cream on the sides (Fig. 2F). Both of these animals exhibited silver irises with a reddish-brown horizontal bar through the pupil.
Call
This species was the predominant frog calling around the summit of Mt. Rossel. I recorded 14 calls from six animals, and calls segregated into two types: a long and a short call (Table 5). The former was the most commonly produced call, with the shorter call being produced more frequently when conditions were drier. Note-delivery rate of both call types is so rapid that to the human ear calls sounds like a high-pitched whinny.
| Specimen | Call type | Temperature (˚C) | Number of calls | Call duration (s) | Notes/ call | Note duration (s) | Inter-note duration (s) | Repetition rate (notes/s) | Dominant frequency (kHz) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPBM 20558 | long | 22.8 | 3 | 2.20 ± 0.1106 (1.98–2.33) |
21–24 | 0.045 ± 0.0028 (0.033–0.157) |
0.052 ± 0.0012 (0.032–0.082) |
10.46 ± 0.0887 (10.30–10.61) |
3.38 ± 0.0062 (3.26–3.51) |
| BPBM 20559 | long | 22.8 | 2 | 2.20 ± 0.0650 (2.13–2.26) |
23–24 | 0.036 ± 0.0043 (0.028–0.190) |
0.060 ± 0.0010 (0.051–0.078) |
10.71 ± 0.0893 (10.62–10.80) |
3.32 ± 0.0059 (3.19–3.37) |
| BPBM 20560 | long | 22.8 | 1 | 2.92 | 31 | 0.037 ± 0.0045 (0.023–0.170) |
0.060 ± 0.0018 (0.036–0.079) |
10.62 | 3.38 ± 0.0100 (3.23–3.47) |
| BPBM 20571 | long | 22.2 | 2 | 2.45 ± 0.0900 (2.36–2.54) |
26–28 | 0.050 ± 0.0036 (0.041–0.182) |
0.041 ± 0.0014 (0.029–0.067) |
11.02 ± 0.0033 (11.02–11.02) |
3.27 ± 0.0054 (3.21–3.31) |
| BPBM 20538 | short | 22.6 | 4 | 0.93 ± 0.0263 (0.85–0.96) |
9–10 | 0.059 ± 0.0023 (0.047–0.105) |
0.038 ± 0.0005 (0.032–0.044) |
10.25 ± 0.2285 (9.57–10.59) |
3.12 ± 0.0045 (3.07–3.18) |
| BPBM 20572 | short | 22.1 | 2 | 1.03 ± 0.0350 (0.99–1.06) |
11–12 | 0.058 ± 0.0033 (0.046–0.112) |
0.036 ± 0.0011 (0.026–0.043) |
11.22 ± 0.1048 (11.11–11.32) |
3.46 ± 0.0104 (3.30–3.50) |
Etymology
The name is an honorific for Betsy and Wayne Gagné, dedicated and inspiring conservationists of Pacific island biotas and among the few western researchers to visit Mt. Rossel, being members of the 1979 Lae Forestry Institute botanical expedition to that mountain.
Range
Endemic to Rossel Island, Milne Bay Province, PNG. It was very common along the upper elevations of Mt. Rossel at 720–750 m elevation, but I found it to occur as low as 280 m elevation.
Ecological notes
The type locality consists of dense cloud forest on a steep ridge on the south slope of Mt. Rossel. Forest here is approximately 5–10 m high, and large gingers and tree ferns are common. Even when rainfall is absent moisture at this site is largely constant due to fog drip from clouds blowing over the ridge. Soil consists of mud on the slopes but with pockets of humus, especially along the ridge. The region is subject to major landslides, with a large landslide extending from just below the type locality to the bottom of an adjacent valley at approximately 250 m elevation. Animals were abundant at the type locality. They also occured less commonly in tall, lowland secondary forest growing at 280 m on clay mud and scree slides. In this area the undergrowth was not dense, and palms, pandanus, and ferns were common.
Frogs called from late afternoon through early morning at the type locality; calling perches were typically stems or leaves from 1–4 m above ground. Frogs typically emitted the longer advertisement calls when conditions were wet. In those circumstances they were not shy and were easily captured. Under drier conditions, the frogs gave slower calls at more erratic intervals, and they often called from hidden perches. Calls in the population would often move in a wave of chorusing activity across the mountain.
The smallest mature male was 16.3 mm SV, and it was recorded calling, but another male at 16.5 mm SV was not yet mature. The smallest mature female had a SV of 19.0 mm; two immature females were 17.0 and 17.4 mm long. Hence, males mature at a smaller size than do females.
The frog community on Rossel Island is rather depauperate; syntopic frogs include only Austrochaperina yelaensis, Barygenys exsul, Cophixalus cupricarenus, Cophixalus kethuk, an undescribed Copiula, Litoria eschata, Litoria louisiadensis, Mantophryne louisiadensis, Nyctimystes perimetri, and an undescribed Oreophryne.
Original Description
- Kraus, F; 2013: Three new species of Oreophryne (Anura, Microhylidae) from Papua New Guinea ZooKeys, 333: 93-121. doi
Images
|
