Difference between revisions of "Schlegelia longirachis"
m (Imported from PhytoKeys) |
m (1 revision imported) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 15:38, 11 August 2023
| Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Aymard2023PhytoKeys230, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Aymard2023PhytoKeys230">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Lamiales
Familia: Schlegeliaceae
Genus: Schlegelia
Name
Schlegelia longirachis Aymard & M.A.Jaram. sp. nov. – Wikispecies link – Pensoft Profile
Type
Colombia. Boyacá. Municipio Otanche. Serranía de Las Quinchas, sector la Y, Finca Lote Terreno, 5°41'42.6"N, 74°19'37.5"W, 1200 m, 26 Oct 2022 (fl, fr). M. Alejandra Jaramillo, Andrés F. Majin-Ladino, Lucindo Galvis & estudiantes de Taxonomía vegetal 2022-1. (Holotype: COL!; Isotypes: UMNG-H!, HUA!). Figs 1, 2.
Schlegelia longirachis resembles S. monachinoi, but can be differentiated from this species by the longer internodes, 4–8cm long in S. longirachis, vs. 1.5–4.5cm in S. monachinoi. The leaf blades densely black punctuated on the adaxial surface, vs. sparsely punctuated towards the base of the blade on both surfaces in S. monachinoi. The inflorescences are longer 4–18 cm long in S. longirachis, vs. 3–11 cm in S. monachinoi. Bracts are oblong vs. lanceolate-triangular in S. monachinoi.
Description
Root-climbing liana internodes 4–8 cm long, ca. 3cm in diameter, pale brown when dry, branches sparsely lenticelate. Leaves simple, opposite; petioles 12–20 mm long, glabrous; leaf blade lanceolate, lanceolate-elliptic, rarely oblanceolate, 4–22 × (3.2) 4.5–9 cm; coriaceous, densely black punctuated on the adaxial surface (Fig. 1C), glabrescent or with simple trichomes located near base and in the midrib on the abaxial surface (Fig. 1B), base obtuse-rounded or cuneate, apex rounded or acute, margins entire, black-brown upon drying; venation brochidodromous, midrib prominent on the abaxial surface, 6–7 pairs of secondary veins, the tertiary veins conspicuously reticulate on the abaxial surface. Inflorescence axillary, narrowly thyrsic with dichasial partial inflorescences; rachis puberulous to sparsely adpressed pubescent (5–12 cm long in flower, 12–18 cm long in fruit); flowers 14–20, produced in long-peduncled, 2–3-flowered dichasia along the rachis, each flower subtended by a bract and 2 bracteoles (Fig. 1D), bracts 2–3 mm long, oblong, glabrous, ciliate at the margins; bracteoles ca. 1 mm long, triangular, ciliate at the margins; pedicels 3.5–4.5 mm in flower, 7.5–8.5 in fruit, adpressed pilose. Calyx cupular ca. 6 × 5 mm, bilabiate fused, 4-lobed, lobes oblong, 2–2.5 (3.2) mm long, apex rounded-acute, white, sparsely puberulent and with white disk-shape glands on the outer surface (visible in dry collections), glabrous and reticulate veined inside. Corolla campanulate-hypocrateriform with 5 reflexed lobes, white, deep pink at the throat (Fig. 2B); tube 7–8 mm long, ca. 4 mm wide in the mouth; lobes 3–4 × 3 mm, glabrous inside, minutely puberulous outside. Stamens didynamous (Fig. 1H), subexserted, filament 3–4 mm long, pilose at the base, inserted at ca. 4 mm from base of corolla; anthers ca. 1.5 mm long, oblong, glabrous; staminode absent. Pistil with conical ovary, ca. 1.5 × 1.5 mm, glabrous; nectariferous disk fused and not clearly differentiated from the ovary base. Fruit a berry, 6.6–8 mm in diam., spherical, drying black, glabrous with conspicuous papillae, covered to the middle by a persistent calyx (Fig. 1I, 2B). Seeds not seen.
Phenology
Collected in flower in March, and in flower and fruit in October.
Etymology
The specific epithet refers to the long rachis of the inflorescences that is present in this new species. The long rachis of S. longirachis displays the flowers away from the foliage, a characteristic that may have some bearing on the pollination strategy of the species.
Distribution and habitat
The species is known to occur in montane forest remnants between 1200 and 1900 m. In the type locality, S. longirachis grows in forest consisting of medium to tall trees.
Conservation status
This species is known only from the type and two additional localities; however, it is reported here as a very rare species. It should be regarded as Endangered (EN) due to the low number of known localities, its estimated Area of Occupancy (AOO) of 12,000 km2, and its estimated Extent of Occurrence (EOO) of 755,768 km2 (IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee 2022[1]). Additionally, the conservation of these forests is at risk due the continuous deforestation and degradation of the “Serranía de Las Quinchas” and their surrounding areas on middle Magdalena river, and the Virolín Region (Galindo-T. et al. 2003[2]) especially in the years during the pre- and post-conflict period (peace agreement was signed in 2017). The expansion of deforestation, degradation and water pollution continues (Salgado et al. 2022[3]), with significantly greater agricultural use, pasture, selective logging, illicit crops and mining (Restrepo et al. 2021[4]). Although conservation status assessments can be made for species with such small numbers of collections (Rivers et al. 2011[5]), it may be difficult to assess whether the appearance of rarity in a species is due to the lack of, or outdated, data, or to its actual rarity (Verspagen and Erkens 2022[6]). Fortunately, the area where S. longirachis occurs is protected as part of the Regional Natural Park Serranía de las Quinchas (Stiles and Bohórquez 2000[7]; Bohorquez-Osorio et al. 2020[8]) and Fauna and Flora Santuary Guanentá-Alto Rio Fonce (Galindo-T. et al. 2003[2]).
Additional specimens
Colombia. Santander. Municipio de Charalá. Corregimiento de Virolín. Vereda El Reloj, Camino a Olival, aprox. 6°08'N, 73°20'W, 1680–1700 m, 03 Mar 1981, S. Díaz Piedrahita 2273 (COL); Municipio de Charalá, Virolín, Vereda Palmar, 6°03'44.8"N, 73°12'50.4"W, 1894 m, 06 Oct 2009, M. Blanco et al. 53 (COL).
Notes
The species described here is morphologically similar to three taxa S. fuscata A. H. Gentry S. monachinoi Moldenke and S. parviflora as characterized in Table 1. However, it is most similar to S. monachinoi from the Andean wet forests in Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela (Gentry 1977[9], 1982a[10], 2009[11]). Both species have elongate, narrow axillary thyrses, the corolla and lobes lilac inside and fruit 0.5–2.5 cm in diam. S. longirachis differs from S. monachinoi in the characters presented in diagnosis. The new species can be distinguished with the key to the species presented below.
| Character | S. longirachis | S. fuscata | S. monachinoi | S. parviflora |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaves | 3–9 cm wide, lanceolate, lanceolate-elliptic, rarely oblanceolate, coriaceous, with simples trichomes on the abaxial surface, black-brown when dry, base obtuse-rounded or cuneate | 5–12 cm wide, widely-elliptic to elliptic, oblanceolate, rigid-coriaceous, with lepidote trichomes and disk-shape glands located near base of midrib on the abaxial surface, brown when dry, base truncate or widely-cuneate | 5–11 cm wide, elliptic, oblanceolate, rarely narrowly ovate, rigid-coriaceous, with lepidote trichomes and disk-shape glands located near base of midrib on the abaxial surface, yellowish when dry, base acute | 4.5–15 cm wide, obovate or elliptic-obovate, coriaceous, glabrescent or with lepidote trichomes and disk-shape glands located near base of midrib on the abaxial surface, olive green or brown when dry, base cuneate |
| Inflorescences | 4–18 cm long, elongate, racemose to narrowly paniculate, puberulent or glabrous | 1–(4)–5 cm long, shorter, racemose or narrowly subpaniculate, inconspicuous puberulent | 4–15 cm long, elongate, racemose to narrowly paniculate, densely hirsute-puberulent (with lax trichomes) | 2–5 cm long, shorter, contracted panicle, almost often fasciculate, glabrous to inconspicuous puberulent |
| Bract | 2–3 mm long, oblong, sparsely puberulent outside, ciliate at the margins | 2–5 mm long, lanceolate, glabrous on both sides, ciliate at the margins | 1–2 mm long, triangular1, densely puberulous on both sides, short-puberulous along the margins | 1–2 mm long, subulate, short-puberulous at least along the margins |
| Calyx | ca. 6 × ca. 5 mm, basally fused, 3–4-lobes, sparsely puberulent outside, brown when dried | 6–7 × 5–6 mm, 3–5-lobed, inconspicuous lepidote, puberulent at the apex outside, black when dried | 4–6 × 3--5 mm, 2–3-lobed, inconspicuous lepidote or subpuberulous at least in the base, yellowish-brown when dried | 4–6 × 3–5 mm, 2–3-lobed, glabrescent or inconspicuous lepidote or subpuberulous at least in the base, brown when dried |
| Corolla | 7–8 mm long, 4 mm wide in the mouth, campanulate-hypocrateriform, lilac inside, lobes 3–4 mm long, minutely (not-glandular) puberulous outside | 10–11 mm long, 4 mm wide in the mount, tubular, lilac inside, lobes 3–4 mm long, glandular-lepidote to glandular puberulous inside | 10–12 mm long, 5 cm wide in the mount, tubular, lilac inside, lobes ca. 5 mm long, glandular-lepidote to glandular puberulous inside | 10–12 mm long, 5 cm wide in the mount, tubular, yellow inside, lobes 4–6 mm long, glandular-lepidote to glandular puberulous inside |
| Staminode | Absent | Present | Present | Present |
Original Description
- Aymard Corredor, G; Jaramillo, M; 2023: A new species of Schlegelia (Schlegeliaceae) from wet montane forest of Colombia and a key for the species of the genus PhytoKeys, 230: 257-269. doi
Images
|
Other References
- ↑ IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee (2022) 1 Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Galindo-T R, Betancur J, Cadena-M J (2003) Estructura y composición florística de cuatro bosques andinos del santuario de flora y fauna Guanentá-alto río Fonce, Cordillera Oriental colombiana.Caldalsia25: 313–335.
- ↑ Salgado J, Shurin J, Vélez M, Link A, Lopera-Congote L, González-Arango C, Jaramillo F, Åhlén I, de Luna G (2022) Causes and consequences of recent degradation of the Magdalena River basin, Colombia.Limnology and Oceanography Letters7(6): 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10272
- ↑ Restrepo I, Aldana A, Stevenson P (2021) Forest dynamics in different scenarios: Selective logging in the middle Magdalena (Colombia).Sustainable Forestry4(2): 72. https://doi.org/10.24294/sf.v4i2.1613
- ↑ Rivers M, Taylor L, Brummitt N, Meagher T, Roberts D, Lughadha E (2011) How many herbarium specimens are needed to detect threatened species? Biological Conservation 144(10): 2541–2547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.07.014
- ↑ Verspagen N, Erkens R (2022) A method for making Red List assessments with herbarium data and distribution models for species-rich plant taxa: Lessons from the Neotropical genus Guatteria (Annonaceae). Plant, People and Planet: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10309
- ↑ Stiles F, Bohórquez C (2000) Evaluando el estado de la biodiversidad: El caso de la avifauna de La Serranía De Las Quinchas, Boyacá, Colombia.Caldasia22: 61–92.
- ↑ Bohorquez-Osorio A, Ulian T, Diazgranados M (2020) Guía de plantas útiles de la Serranía de las Quinchas. Ecología, Economía y Ética, Rutas Turísticas por los Bosques y la Paz. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, E3, UK.
- ↑ Gentry A (1977) Bignoniaceae. In: Harling G Sparre B (Eds) Flora of Ecuador.University of Göteborg & Swedish Museum of Natural History, Göteborg & Stockholm, 1–172.
- ↑ Gentry A (1982a) Bignoniaceae. In: de Febres Z Steyermark J (Eds) Flora de Venezuela.Instituto Nacional de Parques. Dirección de Investigaciones Biológicas, Caracas, Venezuela, 1–464.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Gentry A (2009) Bignoniaceae. Flora de Colombia No 25. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Facultad de Ciencias.Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Bogotá, 462 pp.
- ↑ Moldenke H (1949) New and Noteworthy Plants VIII.Phytologia3: 106–121. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.10091
