Difference between revisions of "Wikis in scholarly publishing"
(→Authors) |
(reordering) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
== Wikis in scholarly communication == | == Wikis in scholarly communication == | ||
''Mention integration with [http://www.science3point0.com/coaspedia/index.php/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Talks/APE_2011/Wikis_as_platforms_for_science_communication scholarly workflows], including teaching.'' | ''Mention integration with [http://www.science3point0.com/coaspedia/index.php/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Talks/APE_2011/Wikis_as_platforms_for_science_communication scholarly workflows], including teaching.'' | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Wiki Journal == | == Wiki Journal == | ||
''Main page: [http://www.science3point0.com/coaspedia/index.php/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Talks/APE_2011/WikiJournal WikiJournal].'' | ''Main page: [http://www.science3point0.com/coaspedia/index.php/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Talks/APE_2011/WikiJournal WikiJournal].'' | ||
| Line 37: | Line 35: | ||
*Mention [http://www.pensoft.net/news.php?n=43 collaboration between ZooKeys and Species-ID] | *Mention [http://www.pensoft.net/news.php?n=43 collaboration between ZooKeys and Species-ID] | ||
*Problem:Cross-domain ontologies | *Problem:Cross-domain ontologies | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Sample article == | ||
| + | *[[Neobidessodes darwiniensis]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Wiki Repository == | ||
| + | ''Main page: [http://www.science3point0.com/coaspedia/index.php/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Talks/APE_2011/WikiRepository WikiRepository]. See [http://www.eoearth.org/article/Thirdhand_Smoke_Exposure_Concerns?topic=49473 here] for an example article.'' | ||
== Business models == | == Business models == | ||
== Obstacles == | == Obstacles == | ||
Revision as of 03:49, 19 February 2011
About
This page serves to draft a contribution to a special issue of Services and Use that is dedicated to the APE 2011 conference at which this talk was given. The issue will be Open Access, authors retain copyright, and our drafting the paper on this wiki has been approved by the publisher. In the spirit of wiki collaboration, we invite others to join the drafting. For some sample articles covering earlier APE conferences, see here. Submission deadline is March 1, 2011.
Title
Science as a Wiki
Authors
Daniel Mietchen, Gregor Hagedorn, Konrad Förstner, Mark Hahnel and Lyubomir Penev
- Others are welcome to join in!
- See also Template:Publication to wiki notice TESTING.
Abstract
Wikis provide an environment that allows to collect, structure, maintain and update knowledge in a coherent fashion, yet their potential for formal publications has not been systematically explored so far. What roles can they play in scientific discourse? What have we learned about their “internal life”? Where do Wikis work – where not? How do wikis relate to “generally accepted knowledge”? And what are the signals that build trust in such results or contributions? How do researchers select and focus contributions: pick up what is new and relevant and skip the irrelevant and redundant? Where do wikis impact publishing, where do they replace it, what can be learned for publishers?
Introduction
Refer to some Beyond the PDF stuff.
Wikis in scholarly communication
Mention integration with scholarly workflows, including teaching.
Wiki Journal
Main page: WikiJournal.
Editorial policies
Main page: Editorial policies.
- add citability
Semantification
- Mention XML-based workflows at Lemon8 and Pensoft
- Mention collaboration between ZooKeys and Species-ID
- Problem:Cross-domain ontologies
Sample article
Wiki Repository
Main page: WikiRepository. See here for an example article.
Business models
Obstacles
Alternatives
Outlook
Refer to some more Beyond the PDF stuff, especially on data publishing.
References
We will link to online references directly, leaving their metadata in the footnotes as usual. All links shall be archived with WebCite.
Figures
Charges for colour figures apply, for which we do not have funds.
Multimedia
Multimedia embeds shall not be possible on the journal site, but they can be integrated with the paper if hosted elsewhere.
- Perhaps mention "debate on the best way to present multimedia content"
