Difference between revisions of "Wikis in scholarly publishing"
m (moved User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/APE 2011/Paper to Draft:Science as a wiki: Testing the draft namespace) |
m (update header) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ''This page | + | ''This page was exported from its previous location at [http://www.science3point0.com/coaspedia/index.php/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Talks/APE_2011/Paper http://www.science3point0.com/coaspedia/index.php/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Talks/APE_2011/Paper] and imported to [http://species-id.net/wiki/Draft:Science_as_a_wiki http://species-id.net/wiki/Draft:Science_as_a_wiki], where the drafting shall continue.'' |
---- | ---- | ||
{{User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/APE 2011/Template-Talk}} | {{User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/APE 2011/Template-Talk}} | ||
Revision as of 03:22, 19 February 2011
This page was exported from its previous location at http://www.science3point0.com/coaspedia/index.php/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Talks/APE_2011/Paper and imported to http://species-id.net/wiki/Draft:Science_as_a_wiki, where the drafting shall continue.
About
This page serves to draft a contribution to a special issue of Services and Use that is dedicated to the APE 2011 conference at which this talk was given. The issue will be Open Access, authors retain copyright, and our drafting the paper on this wiki has been approved by the publisher. In the spirit of wiki collaboration, we invite others to join the drafting. For some sample articles covering earlier APE conferences, see here. Submission deadline is March 1, 2011.
Title
Science as a Wiki
Authors
Daniel Mietchen, Gregor Hagedorn, Konrad Förstner, Mark Hahnel and Lyubomir Penev
- Others are welcome to join in!
Abstract
Wikis provide an environment that allows to collect, structure, maintain and update knowledge in a coherent fashion, yet their potential for formal publications has not been systematically explored so far. What roles can they play in scientific discourse? What have we learned about their “internal life”? Where do Wikis work – where not? How do wikis relate to “generally accepted knowledge”? And what are the signals that build trust in such results or contributions? How do researchers select and focus contributions: pick up what is new and relevant and skip the irrelevant and redundant? Where do wikis impact publishing, where do they replace it, what can be learned for publishers?
Introduction
Refer to some Beyond the PDF stuff.
Wikis in scholarly communication
Mention integration with scholarly workflows, including teaching.
Wiki Repository
Main page: User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/APE 2011/WikiRepository. See here for an example article.
Wiki Journal
Main page: User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/APE 2011/WikiJournal.
Editorial policies
Main page: User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/APE 2011/Editorial policies.
- add citability
Semantification
- Mention XML-based workflows at Lemon8 and Pensoft
- Mention collaboration between ZooKeys and Species-ID
- Problem:Cross-domain ontologies
Business models
Obstacles
Alternatives
Outlook
Refer to some more Beyond the PDF stuff, especially on data publishing.
References
We will link to online references directly, leaving their metadata in the footnotes as usual. All links shall be archived with WebCite.
Figures
Charges for colour figures apply, for which we do not have funds.
Multimedia
Multimedia embeds shall not be possible on the journal site, but they can be integrated with the paper if hosted elsewhere.
- Perhaps mention "debate on the best way to present multimedia content"
