Difference between revisions of "Dragmacidon kishinensis"
m (Imported from ZooKeys) |
m |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
|+ '''Table 2.''' Spicule measurements of six specimens of ''{{Taxon name|Dragmacidon kishinensis}}'' sp. n. examined in detail N<nowiki>=</nowiki>50 unless indicated. | |+ '''Table 2.''' Spicule measurements of six specimens of ''{{Taxon name|Dragmacidon kishinensis}}'' sp. n. examined in detail N<nowiki>=</nowiki>50 unless indicated. | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | ! '''Accession No.''' !! '''Location''' !! '''Sponge Tissue''' !! '''Styles 1''' | + | ! rowspan="2" | '''Accession No.''' !! rowspan="2" | '''Location''' !! rowspan="2" | '''Sponge Tissue''' !! colspan="2" | '''Styles 1''' |
|- | |- | ||
! '''L (µm)''' !! '''W (µm)''' | ! '''L (µm)''' !! '''W (µm)''' |
Latest revision as of 14:20, 2 October 2013
Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Austin2013ZooKeys338, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Austin2013ZooKeys338">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Halichondrida
Familia: Axinellidae
Genus: Dragmacidon
Name
Dragmacidon kishinensis Austin & Ott & Reiswig & Romagosa & McDaniel, 2013 sp. n. – Wikispecies link – ZooBank link – Pensoft Profile
Etymology
After the ancient First Nation (aboriginal) village site kiix?in (pronounced keeshin) which includes Execution Rock Cave, Barkley Sound, BC, where a specimen was collected in the low intertidal.
Material examined
Holotype: RBCM 013-00115-001, KML1111, PEI 44, Steep I., Discovery Passage, BC, (50°4.94'N, 125°15.35'W), 30 m depth, coll. N. McDaniel, Feb. 26, 1976, 1 specimen & in situ image. Paratype: CMNI 2013–-0002, KML1113, KML 139/80, Limestone I., BC, (ca. 52°55'N, 131°36'W), 3 m depth, coll. W.C. Austin, July 4, 1980, 1 specimen.
Other material. KML1112, PEI 130, Copper Cliffs, Discovery Passage, BC, (50°6.40'N, 125°15.35'W), 15 m depth, coll. N. McDaniel, Apr. 16, 1978, 1 specimen; KML1114, PEI 53, Grilse Pt. Texada I, BC, (49°48.03'N, 124°35.79'W), 10 m depth, coll. N. McDaniel, Mar. 13, 1977, 1 specimen; KML1116, PEI 49, Vivian I., BC, (49°50.28'N, 124°41.96'W), 15 m depth, coll. N. McDaniel, Apr. 10, 1976, 1 specimen; KML1121, Sta. no data, Rennell Sound, BC, (ca. 53°24'N, 132°44'W.), depth no data, coll. M. LeBlanc, Apr. 14, 1989, 2 specimens; KML1294, KML 127/76, Execution Rock Cave (48°48.9'N, 125°10.6'W), 0.2 m height, coll. W.C. Austin, July 28, 1976, 1 specimen; RBCM 976-1081, Entrance I., Tasu Sound, BC, (ca. 52°46.04'N, 132°03.55'W), depth no data, coll. P. Lambert, 1976, 1 specimen; RBCM 974-230-3, Brundige Inlet, BC, (ca. 54°37'N, 130°50'W), coll. P. Lambert, June 19, 1974, depth no data.
Description
Macroscopic features. Thick, encrusting, unbranched form, 20 × 20 × 4 cm thick in holotype. Surface with abundant, small (1 mm diam.) and large (1 cm × 1–3 cm) irregular tubercles (Fig. 2A). Consistency preserved: moderately compressible but tough. Oscula numerous, flush with surface and ranging from 0.2 to 4 mm diameter. Aquiferous canals tangential with those near surface leading to oscula. Orange colour in life (Fig. 2A), light tan in alcohol. Microscopic features. Ostia about 0.5 mm diam. in situ penetrate a thin surface membrane between lobes (Fig. 2B); weakly developed plumoreticulate skeleton of 50-100 um diameter fibers extend from base to surface; uni or pauci spicular cross connections (Fig. 2C); halichondroid (confused) skeleton toward the base. No specialized ectosomal skeleton and no axial skeleton.
Spicules
Spicule types include straight oxeas (Fig. 2E), slightly curved styles (Fig. 2G), and strongyles. Oxea tips gradually and sharply pointed; style heads smoothly rounded, slightly narrower than main style body. Styles and oxeas mostly slightly curved or straight; a few strongly curved or sinuous. Strongyles uncommon to rare.
Table 2 lists spicule dimensions.
Oxea and styles in about equal numbers, and of equivalent length. A second category of styles (styles II), while of comparable length to style 1, much thinner. Also much less abundant in two specimens and absent in eight other specimens. Strongyles of comparable width to oxeas and style I, but shorter; few in number in seven specimens and absent in three other specimens. No loose raphids or trichodragmas observed.
Accession No. | Location | Sponge Tissue | Styles 1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
L (µm) | W (µm) | |||
KML1113 | Limestone I., BC | 493–(916)–1300 | 11–(16.1)–28.6 | |
KML1111 | Steep I., BC | 550–(1037)–1960 | 7.4–(18.0)–33 | |
KML1112 | Copper Cliffs, BC | 630–(851)–1100 | 11–(19.6)–30.8 | |
KML1114 | Texada I, BC | 520–(955)–1285 | 11–(14.5)–28.6 | |
KML1116 | Vivian I., BC | Ectosome | 330–(738)–1060 | 11–(16.9)–26.1 |
KML1116 | Vivian I., BC | Choanosome | 580–(872)–1180 | 6.6–(15.7)–24.2 |
KML1121 Specimen A | Rennell Sound, BC | Ectosome | 300–(591)–970 | 8.8–(16)–26.4 |
KML1121 Specimen A | Rennell Sound, BC | Choanosome | 460–(809)–1150 | 8.8–(14.7)–22 |
KML1121 Specimen B | Rennell Sound BC | Ectosome | 550–(930)–1238 | 8.8–(13.8)–19.8 |
KML1121 Specimen B | Rennell Sound BC | Choanosome | 530–(910)–1060 | 4.4–(11.9)–17.6 |
KML1113 | Limestone I., BC | 580–(857)–1200 | 2.2–(6.1)–11 | |
KML1111 | Steep I., BC | 500–(816)–1050 (n=19) | 2.2–(7.4)–11 (n=19) | |
KML1112 | Copper Cliffs, BC | n=0 | ||
KML1114 | Texada I, BC | n=0 | ||
KML1116 | Vivian I., BC | Ectosome | n=0 | |
KML1116 | Vivian I., BC | Choanosome | n=0 | |
KML1121 Specimen A | Rennell Sound, BC | Ectosome | n=0 | |
KML1121 Specimen A | Rennell Sound, BC | Choanosome | n=0 | |
KML1121 Specimen B | Rennell Sound BC | Ectosome | n=0 | |
KML1121 Specimen B | Rennell Sound BC | Choanosome | n=0 | |
KML1113 | Limestone I., BC | 690–(1033)–1300 | 14.4–(20.8)–30.8 | |
KML1111 | Steep I., BC | 904–(1200)–1593 | 12.4–(27.3)–42.2 | |
KML1112 | Copper Cliffs, BC | 670–(983)–1214 | 15.4–(28.1)–46.2 | |
KML1114 | Texada I, BC | 670–(1029)–1380 | 15.4–(24.2)–33 | |
KML1116 | Vivian I., BC | Ectosome | 480–(890)–1200 | 15.4–(27.1)–37.4 |
KML1116 | Vivian I., BC | Choanosome | 780–(1021)–1238 | 13.2–(25.1)–35.2 |
KML1121 Specimen A | Rennell Sound, BC | Ectosome | 390–(701)–1010 | 11–(21.9)–35.2 |
KML1121 Specimen A | Rennell Sound, BC | Choanosome | 440–(966)–1285 | 15.4–(26.9)–33 |
KML1121 Specimen B | Rennell Sound BC | Ectosome | 810–(1096)–1380 | 8.8–(19.3)–26.4 |
KML1121 Specimen B | Rennell Sound BC | Choanosome | 500–(1006)–1285 | 3.3–(15.2)–26.4 |
KML1113 | Limestone I., BC | 520–(707)–800 (n=3) | 22–(26.4)–33 (n=3) | |
KML1111 | Steep I., BC | n=0 | ||
KML1112 | Copper Cliffs, BC | 580–(660)–770 (n=3) | 15.4–(23.5)–28.6 (n=3) | |
KML1114 | Texada I, BC | 580–(750)–900 (n=4) | 15.4–(18.2)–22 (n=4) | |
KML1116 | Vivian I., BC | Ectosome | 220–(622)–900 (n=14) | 15.4–(31.1)–44 (n=14) |
KML1116 | Vivian I., BC | Choanosome | 570–(735)–900 (n=2) | 22–(27.5)–33 (n=2) |
KML1121 Specimen A | Rennell Sound, BC | Ectosome | 210–(399)–730 (n=19) | 17.6–(26.2)35.2 (n=19) |
KML1121 Specimen A | Rennell Sound, BC | Choanosome | 170–(467)–690 (n=6) | 19.8–(26.4)–35.2 (n=6) |
KML1121 Specimen B | Rennell Sound BC | Ectosome | n=0 | |
KML1121 Specimen B | Rennell Sound BC | Choanosome | n=0 |
Remarks
The paucity of thin styles suggests that these are developmental stages. The strongyles may be anomalies or, alternatively, may be associated with one area of the sponge such as the oscula or the area of attachment to the substrate.
The choanosomal skeleton of Dragmacidon kishinensis sp. n. is only weakly plumose. In our material the linear tracts are also less dense than in the type species Dragmacidon agariciformis (Dendy, 1905). In other respects it fits the diagnosis for Dragmacidon which includes species that are thickly encrusting, the surface with tubercles, ectosome without a specialized skeleton, and skeleton not differentiated into an axial or extra-axial region. It also has both oxeas and styles of similar form and in similar numbers.
It does not fit the diagnosis for Axinyssa where the choanosomal skeleton is confused; and where the spicules may be oxeas, strongyloxeas or stylote modifications of oxeas (Erpenbeck and Van Soest 2002[1])
Twenty-six species of Dragmacidon are presently recognized (van Soest et al. 2005[2]: World Porifera Database, accessed February 2013).
Eight species can be excluded from being conspecific based on their having trichodragmas which are lacking in Dragmacidon kishinensis sp. n. All but two of the remaining species without trichodragmas have oxeas and styles which are at least 50% shorter than those in Dragmacidon kishinensis sp. n. The first exception is Dragmacidon oxeon which has styles and oxeas only slightly shorter than those in Dragmacidon kishinensis sp. n.; however, it differs from Dragmacidon kishinensis sp. n. in having a well developed detachable membrane. The second exception is Dragmacidon egregium (Ridley, 1881) which has two classes of styles, one 650–900 µm in length but the other as well as the oxeas only up to 400–450 µm in length.
The weakly developed skeleton is similar to that in Dragmacidon grayi (Wells & Wells in Wells et al. 1960[3]) as described by Alvarez et al. (1998)[4].
Dragmacidon kishinensis sp. n. shows some similarities to species of Axinyssa (Halichondridae) including a disorganized skeleton with, in some species, vaguely ascending vertical tracts toward the periphery. Spicules include oxeas and/or strongyloxeas, here considered to have a fusiform shaft which is pointed at one end and rounded at the other. Dragmacidon kishinensis sp. n. spicules consist of oxeas and styles, the latter are isodiametric rather than being fusiform. There are 28 described species of Axinyssa (van Soest et al. consulted August 2013). They are nearly all tropical.
Conclusions
Based on the comparisons listed in Table 3, our Dragmacidon is a new species. The combination of spicule types and sizes in Dragmacidon kishinensis sp. n. do not match any other Dragmacidon species described. The reduction of a plumoreticulate skeleton and evidence of unoriented spicules suggests a possible affinity with Axinyssa spp. but the latter have only oxeas or strongyloxeas while our species has both oxeas and styles as found in some Dragmacidon spp. Finally, we would not expect to find an Axinyssa sp. in the cold temperate waters of British Columbia.
Dragmacidon agariciforme (Dendy, 1905), p. 186 | Indian Ocean | Has trichodragmas |
Dragmacidon australe (Bergquist, 1970), p. 20 | Australia, New Zealand | Surface extremely hispid, oxeas 217–260–339, styles 320–367–406 |
Dragmacidon clathriforme (Lendenfeld, 1888), p. 82 | Australia | Sponge lobate; has trichodragmas |
Dragmacidon coccineum (Keller, 1891), p. 307 | Indian Ocean | Has trichodragmas |
Dragmacidon condylia (Hooper & Lévi, 1993), p. 1405 | New Caledonia | Oxeas 208–289–360, styles same |
Dragmacidon debitusae (Hooper & Lévi, 1993), p. 1437 | New Caledonia | Oxeas 223–503 styles same, rare |
Dragmacidon decipiens (Wiedenmayer, 1989), p. 47 | Bass Str., Australia | Strongyles 542–770; oxeas styles 278–350–483 |
Dragmacidon durissimum (Dendy, 1905) | Indian Ocean | Has trichodragmas |
Dragmacidon egregium (Ridley, 1881) | S. Chile; N. Atlantic | Ectosomal styles 230–450, oxeas 280–400, axial styles 650–900 |
Dragmacidon explicatum (Wiedenmayer, 1977), p. 159 | Bahamas, N. Carolina | Styles 255–332–400 and oxeas 287–333–375 |
Dragmacidon fibrosum (Ridley & Dendy, 1886), p. 481 | Str. of Magellan | No oxeas; styles 630 |
Dragmacidon grayi (Wells, Wells & Gray, 1960) | N. Carolina | Oxeas 360–460 and styles 240–300 |
Dragmacidon incrustans (Whitelegge, 1897), p. 339 | Gilbert/Ellise Is., S. Pacific | Styles 200–400 and oxeas 350 |
Dragmacidon lunaecharta (Ridley & Dendy, 1886), p. 481 | Cape Verde E. Atlantic, Africa | No styles and oxeas 350–400 |
Dragmacidon mexicanum (de Laubenfels, 1935), p. 6 | Gulf of California | Sponge very hispid; styles 400, and oxeas 300–465 |
Dragmacidon mutans (Sarà, 1978) | Tierra del Fuego | Styles 100–220, oxeas 200 |
Dragmacidon ophisclera de Laubenfels, 1935, p. 7 | Gulf of California | Styles 1200; oxeas 650 smaller; loose raphids and trichodragmas present |
Dragmacidon oxeon (Dickinson, 1945), p. 32 | Gulf of California | Easily detached dermal membrane; styles 900, oxeas 600–1150, slightly smaller than Dragmacidon kishinensis sp. n. |
Dragmacidon reticulatum (Ridley & Dendy, 1886), p. 481 | Gulf of California | Styles 450 and oxeas 450 |
Dragmacidon sanguineum (Burton, 1933) | Natal | Styles 140 and oxeas 211 |
Dragmacidon tuberosum (Topsent, 1928), p. 178 | Boavista Is., E. Atlantic, Africa | Has trichodragmas; styles 315–420, oxeas 370–420 |
Dragmacidon tumidum (Dendy, 1897), p. 236 | S. Australia | No oxeas; small styles 180 |
Bathymetric range
One intertidal record (0.2 m above 0 m [low tide]) in a cave; otherwise 3 m to 30 m depth.
Zoogeographic range
Recorded from Barkley Sound (49°N) to Rennell Sound (53°N), BC.
Ecology
Dragmacidon kishinensis sp. n. is recorded from high wave or high current energy habitats. The tough, encrusting, non branching form would be structurally adaptive for the physical impacts of strong water movement.
Original Description
- Austin, W; Ott, B; Reiswig, H; Romagosa, P; McDaniel, N; 2013: Two new species in the family Axinellidae (Porifera, Demospongiae) from British Columbia and adjacent waters ZooKeys, 338: 11-28. doi
Other References
- ↑ Erpenbeck D, Soest R (2002) Family Halichondriidae Gray, 1867. In: Hooper J Soest R (Eds) Systema Porifera: A guide to the classification of sponges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Pub., New York, 787-815.
- ↑ Van Soest R, Boury-Esnault N, Hooper J, Rützler K, de Voogd N, Alvarez d, Hajdu E, Pisera A, Manconi R, Schoenberg C, Janussen D, Tabachnick K, Klautau M, Picton B, Kelly M, Vacelet J, Dohrmann M, Cristina D (2005) World Porifera Database. http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera [accessed February 2013]
- ↑ Wells H, Wells M, Gray I (1960) Marine sponges of North Carolina. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 76(2): 200-245.
- ↑ Alvarez B, Soest R, Rützler K (1998) A Revision of Axinellidae (Porifera: Demospongiae) of the central west Atlantic region. SmithsonianContributions to Zoology 598: 1-47. doi: 10.5479/si.00810282.598
Images
|