Difference between revisions of "User talk:Gregor Hagedorn"
From Species-ID
m (→Feedback on Main Page) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[User:Stephen Thorpe|Stephen Thorpe]] 03:58, 21 March 2011 (CET) | [[User:Stephen Thorpe|Stephen Thorpe]] 03:58, 21 March 2011 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * I have thought about the unattainable as well. I like your rewording and largely accepted it. Thanks a lot for your collaboration and contributions to the platform! I appreciate your feedback on the changed version! --[[User:Gregor Hagedorn|Gregor Hagedorn]] 08:57, 21 March 2011 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 08:57, 21 March 2011
Feedback on Main Page
>Species-ID is dedicated to publish and integrate open species descriptions and identification tools. The ultimate goal is to enable the identification of all living organisms on earth.<
I wonder if we can make the scope a bit more general to include other types of information in addition to strictly descriptive/diagnostic, e.g. faunistic, bionomic, etc? Also, I'm not sure it is good to have something unattainable as an ultimate goal?
Suggested rewording:
The goal of Species-ID is to offer a dynamic and authoritative open access resource for biodiversity information, with an emphasis on descriptive/diagnostic tools to facilitate identification.
Stephen Thorpe 03:58, 21 March 2011 (CET)
- I have thought about the unattainable as well. I like your rewording and largely accepted it. Thanks a lot for your collaboration and contributions to the platform! I appreciate your feedback on the changed version! --Gregor Hagedorn 08:57, 21 March 2011 (CET)
