Difference between revisions of "Aptostichus chiricahua"
m (Imported from ZooKeys) |
m (1 revision) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 09:53, 20 December 2012
| Notice: | This page is derived from the original publication listed below, whose author(s) should always be credited. Further contributors may edit and improve the content of this page and, consequently, need to be credited as well (see page history). Any assessment of factual correctness requires a careful review of the original article as well as of subsequent contributions.
If you are uncertain whether your planned contribution is correct or not, we suggest that you use the associated discussion page instead of editing the page directly. This page should be cited as follows (rationale):
Citation formats to copy and paste
BibTeX: @article{Bond2012ZooKeys252, RIS/ Endnote: TY - JOUR Wikipedia/ Citizendium: <ref name="Bond2012ZooKeys252">{{Citation See also the citation download page at the journal. |
Ordo: Araneae
Familia: Euctenizidae
Genus: Aptostichus
Name
Aptostichus chiricahua Bond, 2012 sp. n. – Wikispecies link – Chiricahua Mountain Trapdoor Spider’ ZooBank link – Pensoft Profile
Type
Male holotype (AP645) from Arizona, Cochise County, Portal, 31.91369, -109.14081, 1450m, coll. S. Bennett 12.ix.1980; deposited in AMNH.
Etymology
The specific epithet is a noun taken in apposition from the type locality, the Chiricahua Mountains of southeastern Arizona.
Diagnosis
Males can be diagnosed on the basis of a unique conformation of the tibia leg I, spination pattern which comprises numerous spines on the prolateral and distal surfaces (Figs 142–144). This spination pattern is most similar to the Channel Islands species Aptostichus nateevansi, however the Aptostichus chiricahua type specimen has considerably more spines, two rows, along the distal, prolateral aspects of the mating clasper tibia. A considerable geographic distance separates Aptostichus chiricahua and Aptostichus nateevansi. The geographical proximate species, Aptostichus edwardabbeyi, has dissimilar mating clasper morphology and has a distinct offset prolateral rastellar spine and thus is a Hesperus group species.
Description of male holotype
Specimen preparation and condition. Specimen presumably collected live, wandering, preserved in 70% EtOH. Pedipalp, leg I left side removed, stored in vial with specimen; leg IV left side missing. General coloration. Carapace, chelicerae, dark reddish brown 2.5YR 2.5/4. Abdomen yellowish red 5YR 4/6, distinct mottled dorsal markings. Cephalothorax. Carapace 6.25 long, 5.10 wide, hirsute with intermingled thin white, black setae; stout black bristles along fringe; surface smooth, pars cephalica elevated. Fringe, posterior margin with black bristles. Foveal groove deep, straight. Eyes elevated on high mound. AER slightly procurved, PER strongly recurved. PME, AME subequal diameter. Sternum moderately setose, STRl 3.35, STRw 2.88. Posterior sternal sigilla moderate in size, positioned towards margin, not contiguous, anterior sigilla pairs small, oval, marginal. Chelicerae with distinct anterior tooth row comprising 6 teeth, posterior margin with patch of small denticles. Palpal endites with patch of small cuspules on proximal, inner margin, labium with 2 cuspules, LBw 0.94, LBl 0.65. Rastellum consists of 5 stout spines not on prominent mound. Abdomen. Setose, heavy black setae intermingled with fine black setae. Legs. Leg I: 5.60, 3.88, 3.80, 2.48, 2.33; leg IV: 5.55, 2.92. Tarsus I, slender, tarsus IV straight. Light tarsal scopulae on all legs, light scopulae on metatarsus I, II. Tarsus I with single, slightly staggered row of 12 trichobothria. Leg I spination pattern illustrated in Figures 142-144 comprising heavy spination on the patella, tibia, metatarsus; TSp 5, TSr 4, TSrd 3. Pedipalp. Articles slender, lacking distinct spines (Fig. 145). PTw 0.85, PTl 2.57, Bl 1.11. Embolus broad, tapering sharply toward tip, lacking serrations (Fig. 145).
Variation. Known only from the type specimen.
Description of female
Known only from male specimens.
Material examined
Known only from the type material.
Distribution and natural history
Aptostichus chiricahua is known only from a single specimen taken from the type locality in Arizona, Cochise Co., Portal (Map 1). Despite extensive collecting efforts in the area female burrows have never been observed. Based on the paucity of specimens, the species may be quite rare.
Conservation status
Undetermined but likely to be imperiled given its restricted distribution and rarity in collections.
Species concept applied
Morphological.
Remarks
As noted above in the description of Aptostichus nateevansi, Aptostichus chiricahua has a mating clasper that is very similar to the California Channel Island species and thus may be closely related despite the disjunct distribution.
Original Description
- Bond, J; 2012: Phylogenetic treatment and taxonomic revision of the trapdoor spider genus Aptostichus Simon (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Euctenizidae) ZooKeys, 252: 1-209. doi
Images
|
![Figures 142–145. Aptostichus chiricahua sp. n. holotype specimen from Arizona, Cochise Co., Portal Arizona; scale bars = 1.0mm. 142–144 leg I 142 retrolateral aspect [806094] 143 prolateral aspect [806090] 144 line drawings of leg I retrolateral and prolateral aspects 145 retrolateral aspect, pedipalp [806096].](/wiki/File:ZooKeys-252-001-g036.jpg)
